Can’t they make the hood any longer? I don’t want to see any asphalt.
That’s like a retro-futuristic classy 1930’s Batmobile…
I don’t hate it
Or the surprised looks of the children as I run them over.
Mercedes are so low to the ground you’d only have a chance of running over a baby laying down. If those are 21” wheels then literally a 6 month old would be above the hood. https://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/data/who/GrChrt_Boys_24HdCirc-L4W_rev90910.pdf
It’s a prototype, those look more like 30” wheels.
OK so a one year old, who still wouldn’t be walking outside by themselves.
Edit: though i doubt they’re 30”. It’s an EV with solar panels. The size of the wheels will really matter for efficiency.
It’s a prototype. They are made to look cool, not functional. Like typical camera wing mirrors which all prototypes seem to have, which no production car will ever have. Hell, this car doesn’t have any mirrors on it, or lights that pass regs for any country.
Literally the genesis evs have camera wing mirrors lol. Camera mirrors are illegal in the United States so we’ll never have them here, but they are available in the rest of the world.
I’m concerned you don’t understand what happens when a moving, 5,000 lb vehicle strikes a human of any age, laying down or standing up…
That has nothing to do with the conversation. It’s clearly about seeing over the hood, which is a very common complaint about many American style SUVs and trucks. In this case your point is even more irrelevant, because low to the ground cars have higher survival rates since the average human goes over the vehicle rather than under it.
Sounds like you’re just a shitty driver
Takes skill to hit those little fuckers. They move quick.
ha, ha…true tho
Mercedes does, for a while now, have automatic braking if the car detects obstacles.
All cars are required to have automatic braking now.
Long front ends need a comeback
Finally, we’ve returned to designing coupes that look like penises.
So much negativity in this thread. It’s a cool concept and a sexy car.
Removed by mod
I’d rather have actually efficient solar panels at home to charge a regular EV with; this is some solar frickin roadways level impractical nonsense. What if the paint goes opaque after a few years? What abput scratches and dings?
Also can we make the wheels any bigger?
Opaque? That’s a fire.
Scratch? That’s a fire.
Ding? That’s a fire.
So the car itself might not be really sustainable, but it leads money and attention to solarpower by making it sexy, and that alone is already a good thing.
I’m a little thrown by “20% efficient” when paired with “allows 94% of solar energy to pass through.” Are they saying it captures 20% of 6%, i.e., 1.2% of the incident solar energy? Or are they saying 20% is captured and 94% passes through for a total energy recovery of 114%? (This latter is not physically possible, but that doesn’t mean it’s not what they’re saying.)
Basically I would rather they listed the power output of the solar system in Watts.
deleted by creator
Silicon needs a lot of energy to be produced.
I’m curious to see how the material holds up
The insurance payment would rocket to the sky
