Foundation says it won’t compromise policy of inclusivity even if that cash would’ve really helped
It does not matter how much money you do or don’t have, there is no sense pretending there is any sustainable path forward without a conscious commitment to inclusivity.
That’s just it: a sustainable path isn’t in it. They want that to not even be an option. They want to burn it all twice as fast so they can buy bigger yachts.
deleted by creator
There’s a joke about whitespace here somewhere, I just know it.
python chooses insolvency over loosening restrictions on rightfully white space
/j
the terms included a provision that if the PSF was found to have voilated that anti-DEI diktat, the NSF reserved the right to claw back any previously disbursed funds, Crary explained.
“This would create a situation where money we’d already spent could be taken back, which would be an enormous, open-ended financial risk,” the PSF director added.
“Part of the problem here is all the uncertainties,” Crary told us. “Even if we wanted to give up anything that might be considered [DEI] work - which we don’t - part of the risk here is that all these restrictions are new, the language is very broad … I had no interest in being the test case.”
Sounds like a really awful deal; get some funding, but the unpredictable and corrupt US government gets opportunities to bankrupt you.
Fuck yes. Nerds with basic fucking integrity. Mad respect.
My favourite kind of person
DEI was a solution to a problem. When you remove the solution, what remains is the problem.
These terms included affirming the statement that we ‘do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion], or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws,’
Insane. I can’t even fathom adding such a condition. And to a well established org with a positive track record.
Toxic offer. Wouldn’t even be able to say that inclusivity is a good thing.
wait. so its not just about spending the money they are giving on dei? its saying they won’t even with other funds. What if the other funds are mandated to be used for dei? This is just disingenuous. Having a grant that dictates how other donations and grants are used is ridiculous and it was intended to not be taken.
Not only that, but if they do engage in “DEI activities” (definition not included) then they reserve the right to take back the entire grant and and previous money the python foundation had recieved from them in the past. Its a total poison pill, and if this sort of language is widespread in government grants its going to completly gut research in the USA.
Ever since Guido stepped down I’m glad I rowed in behind Python. I like the guy, but the leadership there now has just been unimpeachable on issues like this, same with the local chapter in my country.
Good on them to stick to their guns!
How do donations come with strings? I’ve never…
I think that’s just a bribe in that case isn’t it?
No. It’s called earmarking. It’s super common. I can do it at my local university.
Here’s my $1000 donation, but you must remove one testicle from each member of your team…regardless of their assigned sex at birth. For $2000, we would like two. Thank you!
I don’t know where you donate, but Open Collective doesn’t have a field for “enter your demands to accept this donation”
There’s just no way to do that
You could contact the company directly if you were doing a large donation/wanted to negotiate.
Usually I assume those are phishing and ignore.
My development policy is to use
black.Ruff ftw
Imagine, despite pythons coming in all sorts of diverse patterns, having to hire only albino ones.
In January 2025, the PSF submitted a proposal to the US government National Science Foundation under the Safety, Security, and Privacy of Open Source Ecosystems program to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and PyPI. It was the PSF’s first time applying for government funding, and navigating the intensive process was a steep learning curve for our small team to climb. Seth Larson, PSF Security Developer in Residence, serving as Principal Investigator (PI) with Loren Crary, PSF Deputy Executive Director, as co-PI, led the multi-round proposal writing process as well as the months-long vetting process. We invested our time and effort because we felt the PSF’s work is a strong fit for the program and that the benefit to the community if our proposal were accepted was considerable.
Good
that pic is me when someone offers me to learn javascript
Can I interest you in learning Brainfuck?
ive played with it before
