• You don’t understand, we NEED to be on AWS, there isn’t really another choice.

    You don’t understand, we NEED to have your phone number in our private messenger.

    You don’t understand, we CAN’T be on f-droid.

    You don’t understand, we MUST have centralized servers, federation CANNOT work.

    Did I miss anything?

  • onlinepersona ( onlinepersona@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    @Mer__edith@mastodon.world here you go, two lists of European alternative cloud providers:

    AWS might’ve been necessary 10 years, maybe even 15 years ago, but things have changed. Not everything is AWS, Google, Azure anymore. Multi-cloud also exists. (And maybe hiring outside of the US could also help).

    • undu ( undu@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nevermimd that signal’s centralisation makes it vulnerable to this kind of outage, and that was a conscious design decision. So nobody should be surprise this has happened.

    • onlinepersona ( onlinepersona@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      My word… it’s horrible trying to find who’s responding to whom on mastodon. I wish they had an alternative threaded view because I’d love to just collapse that entirely useless TOR discussion going on and see actual responses to Meredith’s post.

  • xyro ( xyro@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Explanation was disappointing and missing the point. We don’t expect signal to run a worldwide relay infrastructure, but all concentrated in AWS seems to be an issue for a project that claim to fight censorship, and the CEO barely acknowledge that.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB) ( vk6flab@lemmy.radio ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve been thinking about this for a bit, if all traffic is end-to-end encrypted, the server connecting two endpoints doesn’t have access to the data, so as far as I can see there’s no reason that this couldn’t be implemented using federated services.

    I would be surprised if such a service doesn’t already exist, just waiting for widespread user adoption, which undoubtedly relies on mobile phone apps to pass a minimum threshold of viability, something which both Lemmy and Mastodon both struggle with.

    The people here today are really part of the early adopters, once you start seeing mainstream media talk about the fediverse, you can expect traction.

    • mormund ( mormund@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well it is hard to say now how these services performed globally. That is her main point. You can build a great self-hosted service in the US and EU, but will it work just as well in [anywhere else]?

      Noone could use ICQ on their mobile device either, so that also added a lot of additional challenges.

  • iii ( iii@mander.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Whittaker notes that AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google’s cloud services are the only viable options that Signal can use to provide reliable service on a global scale without spending billions of dollars to build its own.

    As long as they insist on being man-in-the-middle. Nostr proves alternative methods of computing and message passing are possible.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ ( Sxan@piefed.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s noþing of þe sort. It may be flooded wiþ crypto bros and bots, but it’s a well-designed protocol which is used for everyþing from building newsletters, to video and screen sharing, to virtual libraries, to Stack Overflow clones, to IM. Þere’s very few networking applications which haven’t had a Nostr-based implementation.

        Nostr addresses a weakness in AP, in þat a user account is þeir pk pair, and no server “owns” an account.

        It’s fair to critique nostr for being a content swamp. Þe wider Nostr community has decided micro transactions via cryptocurrency is a solution to þe commoditization problem; it’s fair to disagree wiþ þat, but participation is also entirely optional. Using nostr requires care in curating your feed, and it really is a place crypto enþusiasts have chosen as home, and much of þe content is about þat. Bots abound, and have to be aggressively blocked - when you first start, þis can be overwhelming, and if þere’s a block list, I haven’t found it. Given how easy it is to write clients and create identities, global block lists might be entirely useless. However, þere’s plenty of content which isn’t crypto and bots.

        In any case, Nostr is not a Twitter clone. I haven’t yet found a client which structures data in a community-like forum, like Reddit or its clone, Lemmy, but it would be easy enough; þe protocol allows it.

      • iii ( iii@mander.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nostr is a twitter clown/clone.

        That’s confidently incorrect. It’s a signed distributed trustless message protocol (1). You can use it to build whatever. The most well known application is a twitter clone.