• I once got assigned a work project to add new functionality to the web service of a recently-acquired company.

    The meat of their codebase was a single lua file to handle web requests, query value from Redis, and then progressively filter out items in a loop. Of course, because Lua has no continue statement, the file was a long series of if / else blocks. It was clear that the development style was to just keep adding new things to the loop. There were, of course, no tests.

    I asked the former CTO of the acquired company (now in a sales) why they went with Lua. His reply was something about how if Lua is good enough for fintech, it should be great for web services. He must have been good in the sales role, because when I learned how much our company paid to acquire this crappy Lua script, my jaw dropped.

    Anyway, that’s all to say that in my sample size of 1, Luarocks has been the least painful part of Lua.

    • hoppolito ( hoppolito@mander.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s a pretty crazy use of Lua if I may say so.

      It is possible to craft continue-like logic in lua, however, with (out of all things) goto statements.

      For example, I have the following code in my dotfiles:

      	for _, lang in pairs(loopvar) do
      		if condition then
      			goto continue
      		end
      		<do whatever the loop actually does>
      		::continue::
      	end
      

      Of course the continue could be called anything. Really felt uncomfortable resorting to this way but it is possible :-)