Hi all. I was excited when I saw a new Dead by Daylight community was created and I’ve been trying to post daily to get it going. Its not my community, but I would love to have a thriving Dead by Daylight community on the Fediverse.

Some Dead by Daylight game content can be mature in theme, and I marked some posts as NSFW because I thought they might be a bit borderline, but I also noticed those posts I did mark as NSFW saw almost no interaction. Not even from the community owner. I suspect the issue is the NSFW flag and I second guessed and removed it, but I wanted to hear perspectives from others on that. Is violent game content worth marking NSFW? Should I just wait and see if anybody is bothered? Does marking things NSFW limit their growth a great deal?

  • nocturne ( nocturne@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is an option to not see NSFW posts in the lemmy settings, so not only will some people not look at them, others will never even see them.

    I’d the content is in images, maybe put the image in the body of the post within a spoiler tag rather than flagging the post nsfw.

  • Blaze ( Blaze@piefed.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Edit: it’s “gore/gross” not NSFL

    Piefed has NSFW and NSFL

    You might consider migrating the community from Lemmy to a Piefed instance to be able to use that feature

    IqIKpYYEynAvwF9.jpg

  • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back before piefed I used to skip nsfw as it was so often so annoying as I definately have a much higher bar for nsfw. For me it has to have straight out nudity at a minimum. A scantily clad figure that could be haning out at a beach is not nsfw for me. Saw this a lot in thighentology. Its like nsfw is not merely a sexy picture. Anyway one reason I went with piefed was the many options which include not bluring nsfw so now I don’t care.

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        maybe. I was on mbin at the time. Its not the only thing I liked with piefed but it was one. Honestly one thing was it has been pretty active with development overall. For important things Im an lts type but for this media type things I am much more give me the bleeding edge alpha.

    • HuntressHimbo ( HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No joke I once had someone call the cards from the game “Love Letter” pornographic. A lot of the “they’re making everything sexless” cranks are weirdos so I stay away from those discussions generally, but I do feel like the needle on amount of sexuality it is appropriate to display has moved too far. There are some scantily clad figures in Dead by Daylight, but the issue more commonly from gameplay clips is violence. Particularly the killer moris are pretty graphic

        • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh man. Outside of all the crazy facist stuff and gun/violence obsession and going way back its a reason I wish I lived someplace else. Our news for a large, liberal city had this piece about a highrise resident upset a neighbor (these are highrises in a city so the neighbor is across a multilane street) walked around naked in his own unit. The piece was like he was doing something wrong but you watch it and you can tell they have the camera right up to the window so its like a person flattening their face to the window to look out at his place. Its like what the hell man there is no way you will see anything if your not out looking for it.

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah I consider anything like not x rated for violence as fine which is pretty much anything in movies and games. I mean like I get doing it for really horrific things in war and accidents. I remember the news stories about the woman walking and hit with glass and im glad there was no footage of it.

  • fonix232 ( fonix232@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    NSFW content will see low/no interaction because of the restrictive default settings of clients (especially on mobile). NSFW won’t show up by default, there’s no notice about it being filtered, and the settings for the filter are either tucked away deep in the specific client settings or don’t even exist… For example, I’m using Interstellar on iOS, and ALL NSFW are filtered, with no option to turn it off - and the fedia.io option of “hide NSFW”, even though I disabled it, doesn’t apply.

    And most users won’t be bothered to go this far to see content they don’t even know about. I’d guesstimate a good 80% of your visitors will be in the same predicament, not seeing NSFW thus not knowing about it thus not bothering to look for it thus never seeing content you mark as such.

    And in my opinion, this simple binary toggle isn’t even the right ah of filtering content. For example, I don’t mind “sensitive” content that isn’t explicitly sexual in my main feed. A lot of topics I’d like to read about can be considered “sensitive”, aka “hide from your kids”, but isn’t generally problematic even in a work environment. On the other hand I do mind sexual content on my feed that makes it impossible to use the Fediverse at work, especially when the client has no option to quickly disable/enable showing these types of posts.

    A better option would be a type selection for the “sensitive” marker, with explicit topics like “content warning: sexual assault” or “sexual content” or “content warning: dead bodies depicted” etc., then let the users filter based on what they’re comfortable with. Grouping everything under a “sensitive content” label just makes it worse because you can’t know what’s gonna be under the blur - a penis? a dead body? a rotting corpse?

      • fonix232 ( fonix232@fedia.io ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d also like to have the “hey we’re actually hiding some content due to regulatory requirements but you can disable that filter here and here” notice prominently delivered to users - but then again that’s up to individual clients unfortunately…

  • Maeve ( Maeve@kbin.earth ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just blocked a community over a big-breasted cartoon character smushed up against something else because filters don’t save when you web browse and clear data on exit, and I never know who’s going to be around, working or not. I don’t need my 8 year old nephew seeing that content.