Nemeski ( nemeski@mander.xyz ) to Rust@programming.dev · 11 months agoSwitching to Rust's own mangling scheme on nightlyblog.rust-lang.orgexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up136
arrow-up136external-linkSwitching to Rust's own mangling scheme on nightlyblog.rust-lang.orgNemeski ( nemeski@mander.xyz ) to Rust@programming.dev · 11 months agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squareINeedMana ( INeedMana@piefed.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoWouldn’t that make the body of the function unsafe too? I would recommend reading up some materials on FFI in Rust Yeah, I’m slowly getting to that
minus-squareTehPers ( TehPers@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoNo, the attribute is unsafe. An unsafe function is marked unsafe fn. Also, unsafe by itself just means there are invariants that must me manually upheld to avoid unsound behavior. If those invariants are upheld, then it doesn’t matter if it’s unsafe.
Wouldn’t that make the body of the function unsafe too?
Yeah, I’m slowly getting to that
No, the attribute is unsafe. An unsafe function is marked
unsafe fn.Also, unsafe by itself just means there are invariants that must me manually upheld to avoid unsound behavior. If those invariants are upheld, then it doesn’t matter if it’s unsafe.