• comfy ( comfy@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      This might not be what you meant, but I’ve found 90+% of the ‘online left’ regardless of ideology to be far more ultra-left, alienated and toxic than most people on the ground, even including the drama kiddos on college campuses and split rival organizations. To everyone I highly recommend finding people in real life, if possible.

    • Digit ( Digit@lemmy.wtf ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably a lot of fake anarchists paid (or duped) to give anarchism a bad name, to give people the wrong idea about what anarchism is, to turn them away from mutual freedom for each and all, back into the arms of daddy corporatarchy government.

      Like that malarch in this thread, saying they wanted to kill 37% of everybody, because anarchism. `_`

    • blindbunny ( blindbunny@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      If either of them don’t do mutual aid their dead to me.

      Commies that say they do mutual aid because of communism I kindly remind them. “You actually do mutual aid because of Kropotkin.”

        • Digit ( Digit@lemmy.wtf ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          And great example that just because you were born to riches, does not mean you have to remain an inegalitarian maintaining the power imbalance keeping the little people down.

          Well done Kropotkin.

            • Digit ( Digit@lemmy.wtf ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              (I’m probably some ways wrong about this in my lingering naivety [and, so, happy (eager, even) to hear counter-arguments, refutations, educations otherwise], but…)

              I see Engels as part responsible for leading Marx astray from listening to Bakunin['s warning] [1].

              It’s my impression that younger Marx was much more fervently libertarian along with his economics, and then later stripped the freedom to a mere wishful happenstance footnote in preference for a more purely economics focus, which opened the door to the authoritarians to usurp his work, and turn it into the whole “well then we’ll make them free” and “some are more equal than others” cognitively dissonant perversion.

              [1: quintessentially: “We are convinced that liberty without socialism is privilege, injustice; and that socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality,” – Mikhail Bakunin]

      • Digit ( Digit@lemmy.wtf ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        If either of them don’t do mutual aid their dead to me.

        is that,

        If either of them don’t do mutual, aid their dead to me.

        or

        If either of them don’t do mutual aid they’re dead to me.

        ?

    • Let me be that exception! I think the best way to destroy authoritanism, is to help people become so independent of other’s resources, that they can just decide to opt out of work for good. And there would be no way to strike against them that isn’t blatant force or robbery (Can’t cut their electricity due to bills, can’t cut their food source as they grow their own, passive water generation, technical expertise, no illegal activities, small amount of passive income to cover land tax).

      They would still have small vulnerabilities, but it would be quite quite hard to force them and keep them in a toxic workplace, if they can just chill for months or even YEARS, without being forced to work. This will force workplaces to basically suck up to the average employee, increase raises, increase benefits, and oh…abuse would be completely intollerable.

      • Digit ( Digit@lemmy.wtf ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah. Bring on the emancipatory technologies.

        All the technologies that can emancipate us, each and all.

        Y’know…

        All those technologies that are suppressed by capitalists to maintain their crippling extortionate rents that happen to be very polluting too.

        And to, oh, y’know, undo all the McCarthyian redscare psyop that conflates anarcho-communism with totalitarian communism and presents capitalism as the system that frees them.

        “Ferengi don’t want to end the exploitation. They want to become the exploiters.” – Rom

        Would be a lot easier once people stop falling for all the “advertising and marketing”.

        Or if someone just decides to provision everybody with spaceships of their own. Each capable of printing another of itself instantly, sustain life, with zero-point energy powered zero-inertia propulsion, safe enough for a 2 year old to fly home. I hear these already exist (for about a century now). Could have not just “disclosure”, but radical provisioning sublimation. Do you have spaceships yet? And the reassurance everybody else does too so they’re not trying to take yours?