• frongt ( frongt@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Benefit of 64-bit only? They don’t have to develop and test everything for two architectures, and if there are CPU extensions only available on 64-bit processors, they can start using them now.

    • thingsiplay ( thingsiplay@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They don’t need to test two architectures, if there is only 32-bit. So that’s not a real point. And CPU extensions for a basically shop? Alright the Steam app is not just a store, that’s true, but it’s not like a game or low level library itself. So I am not sure if additional 64-bit only CPU extensions is a great reason.

      I’m not convinced at the moment that this is a huge win. The biggest reason is being dependent on the older libraries, which in some environments is just nasty. I am also not against 64-bit only. It is just surprising how much demanding some users are and how hugely celebrated this is, if it actually doesn’t matter much in real world. As said, besides the library thing.

      • tazeycrazy ( tazeycrazy@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        With windows 11 not supporting 32 bit the librarys will slowly start become stale and more work would need to be done to upgrade or patch issues that arise. In theory any program should be forward compatible but steam is still active and needs to be a moving target. but what would be the point supporting an architecture that the os isn’t even supporting.