• Tiresia ( Tiresia@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      How do you expect there to be a “we all” to invade without “us all” being able to take on nation-states?

      Daily reminder that the Taliban managed to send the US military packing by fighting from a cave with a bunch of scraps. Guerilla is incredibly effective at turning empires into dust if you start the guerilla prepared, which any newly independent anarchist commune would automatically be by virtue of being newly independent.

        • Tiresia ( Tiresia@slrpnk.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, but they serve to illustrate how a guerilla can defeat the largest state military in the world, which is what the concern was.

          If you want to have exact historical examples of something succeeding before supporting it, you’re never going to be first at anything. And with capitalism murdering over a hundred million of our grandchildren per year, we don’t have the luxury of patience.

    • ProdigalFrog ( ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Anarchists can organize and fight militarily quite effectively while still maintaining bottom-up system, as demonstrated by the Anarchist militias of Makhno and Catalonia (and though not Anarchist, Rojava is an example of a decentralized army). The issue all Anarchist attempts have faced militarily is a lack of any allies on the world stage, allowing the authoritarian nations around them to crush them due to lack of supplies (or sudden betrayal of ML ‘allies’).