• lmr0x61 ( lmr0x61@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    7 months ago

    As mentioned elsewhere, this is appropriate for anyone doing database administration, because DB writes should always be a trans action.

    • Tja ( Tja@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I get that this is a joke, but…

      … ackshually it should almost never be a transaction only when there’s absolutely no other option, because transactions kill your performance.

      • Actually transactions can be a secomd-layer safety-net for single-responsibility writers to ensure rollback on eg restarts and consistency on loadbalancer redecisions without having much of an impact on performance, and data integrity is usually quite important.

        • Tja ( Tja@programming.dev ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          As long as the database is acid restarts should not be a factor. Data integrity is not helped by transactions, you would need error correcting codes for that. Plus the effect on performance is quite notable on all dbs I’ve worked with.

          • Restarts in a server between dB updates that in a sane world would be txns I meant (e.g update A, crash so don’t update B). Anyway, in postgres they’re pretty cheap in the absence of actual conflict – more expensive if you have actual cinflicts, obvs.

              • Well it depends how much data integrity is worth to you, and how your system works. Every write in postgres is already a transaction - when you can get away with simple crud stuff, often there’s nothing to do, you have transactionality already. Transaction isolation levels are where db operation costs might change under concurrent conflicting writes but you can tune that by ensuring single-writer-per-partition or whatever in your server logic and it might add a ms or two. OTOH if you have heavy contestation it can be much more expensive. The performance implications are complicated but can certainly kept to a fraction of overall cost depending on your workload!

                • Tja ( Tja@programming.dev ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Again, not data integrity (Error correction) but consistency (aCid). Adding two milliseconds to a half a millisecond operation is by no means cheap…

    • Hexarei ( Hexarei@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve been in the industry for 13 years, a technologist using Linux for 19 years - I think I’d count as a greybeard if I hadn’t lasered it off as part of my transition lmao

        • femtek ( femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          I had Lazer done on face, chest, arms, legs, and genitals. You need to do like 8-12 sessions but I haven’t had to shave in years. Though there are like 5 clear hairs now that I pluck.

        • Effectiveness depends on your skin and hair color, paler skin and darker hair get better results. Results are permanent, a dead follicle stays dead for good, but you won’t get 100% removal with a single pass because of how hair follicles cycle in and out of active duty. You’ll need to do multiple treatments over the course of several weeks or months depending on how your hair grows.

        • ButteryMonkey ( ButteryMonkey@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I can’t speak for lasers, but if you want to try something less permanent but -much- cheaper, to see how well it works for you or how you like it before you commit to laser, pick up an IPL device (intermittent pulses of light). It works similarly, but if you stop using it for a long time, the hair eventually grows back. Mostly.

          Once you get it to the point that it’s not growing anymore, which is like 2-4 months of use as directed by the device itself, depending on your hair/skin combo and the strength of light you use (which in full fairness, it does start as a several-times-weekly commitment) you only need to do spot treatments every few months, which I understand is something you have to do with laser anyway every 6-12 mths, this is just a bit more frequent. If you stop using it entirely, you’ll start to get noticeable regrowth after about 6 mths, but it could stay thin for years. I have some places I stopped doing and they are still noticeably thinner and finer than places that never got treated at all, 5+ years on.

          The one I bought was like $125 usd a decade back, so they can be pretty affordable, and might be all you ever want to use since you can do it on your own time.

        • Hexarei ( Hexarei@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          As someone with dark hair and quite pale skin, I was basically a perfect case for it. At 7 sessions so far, the number of hairs that still grow on my face are countable - 43 of them by my count - I still do have to shave but it takes like 30 seconds because they’re all focused on my upper lip and one particularly stubborn spot on my chin. The important part is that when I shave, I have no beard shadow at all now. I may not 100% pass yet without makeup but it makes makeup way easier to not have to also collor-correct for beard shadow.

          Others have answered with more detail but yeah, it also does take testosterone suppression or you’ll have to go back every so often to address any new/rejuvenated hairs. A cis guy friend of mine has to go just about every year.

        • Undvik ( Undvik@fedia.io ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just for your information, it only works in combination with suppressing Testosterone. as long as testosterone is present in high levels it will come back

    • [object Object] ( panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I feel like greybeards were always people who care little for the standards/expectations of society.

      They probably have a lot in common with trans people, who unfortunately are forced to overcome very aggressive and hostile societal standards.

      But Greybeards have a lot of luxury relative to trans people. They’ve always gotten to do what they want because of competency as a bargaining chip. Trans people as a group generally don’t have that.

      Anyway, I’m rabbit holing. We treat trans people awful and they do nothing to deserve that.

      Edit: I don’t mean to say trans people aren’t competent, just that greybeards privilege exists because they’ve passed through a specific niche filter that the general population has not

      • skrlet13 ( skrlet13@feddit.cl ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Indeed.

        A Transition Plan suggestion (?):

        1. Become a Greybeard
        2. Transition as you prefer
        3. Use your competency to give trans rights to yourself and peers
        4. Be happy and Profit!
      • Trainguyrom ( Trainguyrom@reddthat.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I can’t tell if there’s a pun that’s going over my tired head (I just walloped myself with an early spring bike ride while recovering from a cold) but IT like any career is pretty easy to break into. Go to school and get a degree (I found a 2 year networking degree was sufficient to put myself on a very nice career trajectory. I’ve already hit mid-high level in my career based off only existing less than a decade of work experience, my technical knowledge and my 2 year degree) then start applying to jobs as you get close to graduating. You’ll probably start in the help desk, then after a couple of years or so of that you can start applying to more administrative roles, such as maybe an admin role at a MSP or maybe you’ll get lucky and snag an internal jr admin role somewhere to get started out, then you can further specialize from there if you wish, but once you get a job that has “admin” in the title and doesn’t crush your soul you’re already at a good point to coast if you so wish