• Mordikan ( Mordikan@kbin.earth ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the definition of a zero effort post.

    You don’t want to put forth the effort to bug hunt, you want an AI agent to bug hunt for you. You don’t want to learn to even setup the agent, you want other people to explain step by step how to do that for you.

    I’m assuming you aren’t even going to review before it submits. Honestly though, how would you review it given you don’t know anything about the topic its submitting on.

  • hendrik ( hendrik@palaver.p3x.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Did you forget the body text? Or is this some bug? Looks like a question here, and like an AI fabricated tutorial in the original version of this cross-post.

  • utopiah ( utopiah@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    This makes me genuinely curious, who thought that would be a good idea?

    It feels like a lot of “contribution” to open source suddenly is fueled by AI hype. Is it a LinkedIn/TikTok “trick” that is being amplified that somehow one will get a very well paid job at a BigTech company if they somehow have a lot of contributions on popular projects?

    Where does that this trend actually come from?

    Did anybody doing so ever bother checking contribution guidelines to see which tasks should actually be prioritized and if so with which tools?

    This seems like a recurring pattern so it’s not a random idea someone had.

  • Hexarei ( Hexarei@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    run a local LLM like Claude!

    Look inside

    “Run ollama”

    Ollama will almost always be slower than running vllm or llama.cpp, nobody should be suggesting it for anything agentic. On most consumer hardware, the availability of llama.cpp’s --cpu-moe flag alone is absurdly good and worth the effort to familiarize yourself with llamacpp instead of ollama.

  • Props for putting something together and not burying it in a 20 minute YouTube video.

    My mind initially went to OpenCode - I’m not familiarity lite-cc - any reason you opted for that? Is it just kinder on smaller local models?

    • hendrik ( hendrik@palaver.p3x.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Judging by the github repo, it’s the very basic cousin, written (vibe-coded) in Python. It doesn’t do planning or anything, just preface your command with a system prompt telling your model it’s a coding assistant. And gives it tool access to read and write files. And execute commands.

      And seems no human uses it, there’s no interactions like bug reports, PRs or people who star and like the repo.