• XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) Banned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 months ago

    This crack sounds too scary to use. Impressive, but scary.

    As usual for any DRM company or publisher, Irdeto also claimed that downloading games with the bypass is a security concern, but this time around, the company has a valid point.

    Using the hypervisor bypass, even in its latest incarnation, requires users to… [install] a community-made hypervisor (HV) with Windows running on top of it. This HV fakes responses to the checks that Denuvo makes, and runs with higher permissions… than the operating system itself and has full, nearly untraceable access to hardware and software.

      • ColeSloth ( ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        On a technical level… Less.

        The exploit completely guts and opens up your system to pretty much anything. More access than even denovo.

        Use the included scripts (or manually do it yourself or make your own script) to re enable everything after you’re done playing the game and reboot the system. I’d also leave the router unplugged while you play. This denovo bypass seriously leaves your system super unsecured. Only get your games using this exploit from very trusted sources and don’t be lazy about enabling everything again and rebooting before plugging back into the internet.

      • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) Banned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nasty stuff I don’t want on my computer either. As an amateur, was really hoping the cracks would remove it, not circumvent it…

      • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) Banned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem with well-coded malware is it won’t execute unless it thinks it’s not being watched. And based on everything else in this article, it sounds like you’d also be opening your computer up to other parties exploiting security holes in the process.

        So a separate computer might work, but it would have to stay separate.

  • Zacryon ( Zacryon@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    DRM to prevent copying games without official license has always been a waste of money. It is always just a matter of time until even the hardest DRM measure is broken. Always has been like this. I remember when Ubisoft was very proud of their new fancy DRM shitware that prevented running unlicensed copies of some Assassin’s Creed title, only for it to be cracked a month later and the crackers saying “thanks for this interesting challenge”.

    • Malgas ( Malgas@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not only has that always been the case, but that’s the only possibility: DRM, on a fundamental level, is just encryption where Bob and Eve are the same person.

      (For the uninitiated, the basic problem statement for cryptography is that Alice wants to send a message to Bob without Eve knowing what it says.)

  • misk ( misk@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    There is 0 details on specifics of how Denuvo was broken. Article goes into detail why Denuvo is bad and not much more (which is also debatable because vast majority of Denuvo implementations do not cause performance impact).

      • misk ( misk@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Correct but irrelevant to what I’ve said, which is that the performance impact of Denuvo is usually minimal. There’s a couple of very bad cases that got a lot of publicity but there’s boatloads of Denuvo games running fine.

        It’s cool Denuvo was cracked. It’ll be fixed eventually and the never ending game of cat and mouse continues.

        • Itsamelemmy ( Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not about performance for me. I’m not paying for a single player offline game that requires internet. I was around for the Spore DRM. That started with 3 activations and having to call EA for more. Even the current 5 activations per day is too restrictive, as I’ve heard changing proton version counts as an activation. If I don’t own it (yes technically you don’t steam games, but I think I could easily bypass steam protection and still play my games if it came down to it) I’m not buying it.

          • misk ( misk@piefed.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            How is that relevant to anything I’ve said. It’s like this article, „forget what this news is about, let’s dunk on Denuvo”. I guess they know their audience.

        • apotheotic (she/her) ( apotheotic@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          article goes into why Denuvo is bad but not much more (which is debatable…

          I mentioned why denuvo is bad. I wasn’t replying specifically to your argument about performance, because that’s only a slice of the reason why denuvo is bad.