StopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) to conspiracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 months agoThe role of medicines and vaccines in reducing disease and death is greatly exaggerated - sanitation deserves most of the creditblog.rootsofprogress.orgexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up15cross-posted to: StopTech@lemmy.today
arrow-up15external-linkThe role of medicines and vaccines in reducing disease and death is greatly exaggerated - sanitation deserves most of the creditblog.rootsofprogress.orgStopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) to conspiracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square14linkfedilinkcross-posted to: StopTech@lemmy.today
minus-squareArchangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoLol! That’s a pretty convoluted way of admitting that you didn’t read the article.
minus-squareStopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoI read all of it actually
minus-squareArchangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoAnd which part exactly, led you to conclude that vaccines are not effective?
minus-squareStopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoI didn’t conclude that
minus-squareArchangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoWhat did you conclude then? Because your other comment was so convoluted that it obviously wasn’t clear what your point is.
minus-squareStopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoI concluded exactly what the title of this post says
minus-squareArchangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoThen you didn’t really read the article, did you?
minus-squareStopTech ( StopTech@lemmy.today ) OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoIf that’s what you conclude then I don’t think you read it
Lol! That’s a pretty convoluted way of admitting that you didn’t read the article.
I read all of it actually
And which part exactly, led you to conclude that vaccines are not effective?
I didn’t conclude that
What did you conclude then? Because your other comment was so convoluted that it obviously wasn’t clear what your point is.
I concluded exactly what the title of this post says
Then you didn’t really read the article, did you?
If that’s what you conclude then I don’t think you read it