Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
inari ( inari@piefed.zip )  to Green Energy@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 months ago

Colored solar panels that mimic tiles roof hit 95% efficiency compared to regular solar tiles

interestingengineering.com

external-link
message-square
26
link
fedilink
146
external-link

Colored solar panels that mimic tiles roof hit 95% efficiency compared to regular solar tiles

interestingengineering.com

inari ( inari@piefed.zip )  to Green Energy@slrpnk.netEnglish · 5 months ago
message-square
26
link
fedilink
Colored solar panels that mimic tiles roof hit 95% efficiency
interestingengineering.com
external-link
German scientists have designed colored PV films that let solar panels resemble roof tiles while maintaining about 95 percent performance.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • jerebear39 ( jerebear39@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    The ability to have energy generation from roof tiles is so damn cool!!! The solarpunk future is becoming more true every day, and I’m all for it!

    • Etterra ( Etterra@discuss.online ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tell me they’re not shiny enough to melt vinyl siding and I’m sold.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk ( SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a waste of money. Most of the tiles will be in shade. PV panels are better and easily replaced if damaged by weather.

      • EldritchFemininity ( EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        And roof installations for panels are expensive to put in and take out, and need to be taken out to replace roof shingles/tiles under them.

        This tech might end up being the best of both worlds for roof panels because they have the potential to remove the frame from the equation.

  • gandalf_der_12te ( gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    or, you know, you can just put them somewhere else and use cables to transport electricity to the house, like it was done the last 100 years.

    • RheumatoidArthritis ( RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      On my way to buy a plot of land to save on energy bills 🚄

      • gandalf_der_12te ( gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        fun fact: buying a plot of land and building solar panels there is cheaper than building solar panels on the roof, if you do it large-scale. like 1 MW each. even though you use extra land area. the reason is mostly how costly it is to climb on roofs and do construction work there.

    • Korhaka ( Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, but they aren’t doing that very fast. So gotta buy my own.

    • Etterra ( Etterra@discuss.online ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Have you ever been on a hot roof in summer? At least this puts that necessary but otherwise unused surface area to use.

    • EldritchFemininity ( EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Instructions unclear, bulldozed public spaces to build a parking lot with a solar roof over it.

      Will try again with nearby farmland.

    • arrow74 ( arrow74@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Still a great piece of tech. I think decentralizing power generation is better for both land use and for the individual.

      These panels will be nice for areas with strict architectural laws

  • in_my_honest_opinion ( in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    20% is what standard photovoltaics were doing a decade ago. I cannot wait until these are standard on all roofs in a few decades.

    Edit: Yes I know the title is misleading, I’m saying these colored roof tiles are performing on par with the setup many Americans installed 10 years ago at the height if the subsidies.

    • Korhaka ( Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s 95% of regular panels, so it’s 5% worse.

      I would go with regular panels in that case, unless they are shaped like tiles and can provide better coverage of the roof. 5% efficiency drop but 15% coverage increase could be worth it. But I expect install costs would be quite a bit higher

    • Thorry ( Thorry@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • ExLisper ( ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imagine this + electric cars working as grid storage.

  • melsaskca ( melsaskca@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wouldn’t you want them all to be black to maximize effectiveness? Damn marketing. In the not too distant future daily talk shows will have segments on which colours are fashionable this year for solar panels.

    • Rubanski ( Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      But why? It’s not about heat absorbtion but photon collection

      • melsaskca ( melsaskca@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m no solar panel expert, just using common sense. If it is not heat conversion then I’m whistling in the wind. Black absorbs more heat, more quickly, but if it is not about heat, just light, then ignore this.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk ( SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Energy at certain wavelengths hits the solar cell and migrates electrons in a flat plane. Thin wires grab those electrons to make current. Heat actually reduces the efficiency.

        • zaphod ( zaphod@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Solar panels that absord heat exist, those panels are used to heat water. For PV you want to capture photons that kick electrons from the valence band into the conduction band of the material to get an electric current. Basically the inverse of an LED, you turn light directly into electricity. Any heat here is wasted energy. The PV cells are optimised for specific frequency bands and in those bands they don’t reflect well. If you want to capture visible light the panels are appearing relatively dark.

        • Rubanski ( Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Check out why Einstein got his Nobel Price. That’s the fundamental mechanism behind solar panels. It has nothing to do with the absorbtion of heat. If you use solar to heat water, that’s a different type of solar collector

        • Seefra 1 ( sefra1@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually, photovoltaic solar panels work more efficiently when cold, heat makes them less efficient. I’ve read.

    • InFerNo ( InFerNo@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sometimes historic buildings have a strict code to follow, this might help to modernize them while keeping the historic aesthetic.

  • Hakuso ( Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d rather they get back to those transparent panels that suddenly vanished from the university page and all articles went poof.

    • inari ( inari@piefed.zip ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a really cool idea. Natural lighting + power generation

      • Hakuso ( Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was hoping for it to be manageable on a greenhouse, though they hadn’t published any specs on light quality after it passed through them, so no idea if it would have been good for the plants.

  • doodoo_wizard ( doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We say african american solar panels now 😤

Green Energy@slrpnk.net

energy@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !energy@slrpnk.net

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

  • Electric Vehicles
  • Offgrid living
  • Hydrogen@fedia.io
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 86 users / day
  • 226 users / week
  • 793 users / month
  • 2.35K users / 6 months
  • 97 local subscribers
  • 4.61K subscribers
  • 1.98K Posts
  • 4.17K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • Steve ( SteveKLord@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code