I have quite a few creative ideas, but am too tired to write them down rn. I’ll go the easy, lazy way (and write about more legislation ideas tomorrow):
Proportional representation like Germany. In every election, the voter votes for an individual and a party. The individual is chosen to represent the riding through STAR voting (my version). After all MPs are elected, to ensure proportional representation according to the party votes (the second vote that voters cast), individuals from party lists are put into parliament.
This way, we get riding representation and party representation.
Proportional representation without question
- The banning of all future fossil fuel expansion.
- Criminal charges for any Canadian fighting in the IDF or involved in sending arms to Israel.
- Require that all vehicles in excess of 2 tonnes require a commercial license to operate. The idea would be that this limit would gradually be reduced to a sensible number over time.
- Vehicle speed limiters, ideally tied to the region you’re in (city/highway).
I know, you asked for one, but there’s a lot of stuff to be done.
Ban age verification laws.
Ive been thinking of these laws myself for the longest time as well. Glad im not the only one
Immediately end all subsidies and preferential tax treatment of the fossil fuel sector.
Nationalize all natural resources in Canada. Oil, minerals, water, electricity, you name it.
Ban online gambling.
Collectivization of all industry. Or if that’s too pie in the sky, strengthen and actually enforce local ownership requirements over Canadian news orgs.
Worker cooperatives.
Also, housing cooperatives and other types of cooperatives everywhere.
Sounds like communism, I like it!
A good start would be for the federal government to stop funding news orgs that have more than 0% foreign ownership or funding.
National priorities: 1. PR, 2+3. UBI paid by wealth tax, 4. healthcare, 5. nationalization of resource and infrastructure assets. If you can fit all of that in one bill then that counts.
My priority: A new railway bill. Mandate passenger trains having right-of-way over freight, and create a new infrastructure manager tasked to buy/seize, develop and improve railways for passenger or passenger-freight dual use (or +military for triple use) and create a usable national network.
Ban algorithmic timelines for all social media, news, and entertainment.
Ban real-time algorithmic pricing.
Enforce a higher standard of driving, tailgating, extreme speed, distracted driving is insane.
All timelines are algorithmic except for AI generated timelines, which are heuristic. You’re gonna force them to put AI in the timeline
Obviously I’m referring to ranked predictive timelines vs chronological. A basic heuristic chronological feed (eg. most recent) has little in common with modern machine learning powered social media timelines designed to be “most relevant”.
You’re right, we should ban heuristic timelines and force them all to be algorithmic.
The “tithe” law. Profit capped at 10% to keep costs and chicanery down. People and corps taxed at 10% across the board. GST/PST 10% total. Capitalism, but non-aggressive, loaded with social programs. I guess I might as well throw in flying pigs. Yes, pigs should fly, and it oughta be a law.
A flat tax+consumption tax is very regressive. Poor people would be taxed almost 20% and rich people would be taxed almost 0%. Most of their income is capital gains, against which they occasionally take out loans for consumption. Their consumption is much less than their wealth increase. Their wealth increase is much higher than their income.
Hmm. Most of the basic industries would probably pass that margin no problem. I think production vehicles even fall under 10%.
Anything bespoke, from machine tools to Etsy stores, is going to implode overnight, though.
The price of food cannot increase.
There’s too many that would benefit Canada immensely.
Since most of my first thoughts were already said, maybe criminalising corporate involvement in politics? Or price fixing. Hell, even nationalising necessities would be good (food, housing, utilities - including phone/internet).
Another thought would be requiring a total compensation disparity of no more than 7x - as in, if any employee is being paid $17.85 (current BC minimum), the total compensation for the highest can be, at most $124.95, including stocks and other benefits that can be considered compensation. Its still a fucking insane difference, but much more sane than not having a cap at all.
To allow booking MAID in the future based on developing conditions such as dementia. I definitely want to do this.
peanut gallery here but man would I love this. its like if I have demetia and can’t chew and swallow whol foods and can’t use the bathroom myself. Yeah. Im done.
Eliminate limited liability for holders of voting shares in corporations. Charges and lawsuits can go after any and all assets of every holder of voting shares in a corporation.
In most corporations, the only thing that shareholders really do is vote in relation to who the directors are. The directors and officers are generally the ones who actually do things.
The directors are often also in charge of share sales and transfers. In corporations not in the stock market, you often can’t sell, redeem, gift, or otherwise get rid of you shares whenever you feel like it.
Officers are also appointed by directors, not by shareholders, so that could be another step removed from having agency over what’s happening.
Many CEOs have shares as part of their compensation package, as do many other members of the C-suite. Regardless, by making voting shareholders liable for all cause penalties, their selection of leadership roles would necessarily change. That would include lawsuits, fines, environmental penalties, HR violations, civic wear and tear, back taxes, etc.
Most shareholders has no control over the actions of the President or CEO, or even have any power to decide on who any of the officers of the corporation even are.
In your hypothetical senario, you should consider the board of directors or maybe even the ISC.
Labd value tax
I think the new sovereign wealth fund might do this but if not its heading the right way:
When the government funds a company like a startup or bails out an existing company it should get shares in those companies.
This would allow us to increase the amount of money in our public market which will increase the amount of companies being started in Canada. And the conservatives will be less able to bitch about it because its an investment and running the government like a business. Not that any of them know how to do that.
Truly, I don’t understand how this isn’t a thing already, it’s so basic. In any other context, a large investor in a private company acquires a share of it. In Canada, if the large investor is the government, its a gift?? Wtf??? I’d even be okay to, say, build on some clauses that the government buys shares at a higher price, or needs to divest at X time, first right to buy back, etc., if people are afraid of the government literally taking over everything.
Or even simple clauses, like CEO take a pay cut, no bonuses, etc. But this business of privatizing gains and socializing losses only helps the ultra wealthy hoard wealth at the expense of everyone else. It’s incredibly immoral to take bailouts, then give bonuses and even fire workers.
