• For the life of me I don’t understand why people are putting them anywhere before every rooftop is covered with them. Roofs are dead space and unlikely to have debris issues (at least compared to a railway).

    • warm ( warm@kbin.earth ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s companies trying to make a quick buck. They tried this with roads too.

      Obviously every home should have them first and all newly built homes should be built with solar efficiency in mind.

    • DrunkenPirate ( DrunkenPirate@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Deployment on rails is dirty cheap. Can be highly automated and you have highvolt power line just a few meters away.

      If you put solar upon your roof, 2/3 of the costs are labor costs. The material bill encompasses electrics, mounting system, cables, and pv panels that can get reduced on railways as well.

      • Cheap if you only count the cost of plopping them down and walking away, the train could kick up enough dust and debris that efficiency is impacted significantly more than installing them on a roof would have been, necessitating installing new ones sooner.

        • DrunkenPirate ( DrunkenPirate@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It’s all theory. That’s why I think it’s worth a try and learn the facts.

          Edit: A rough estimation with averages: 10 kWp gives 11kwh a year in Swiss, 1kwp panel costs 500€, 1kwh energy costs 0,28 EUR in Swiss. Panel material costs for 10 kWp is 5,000€ and earns you 3,080€ (11,000*0,28€) yearly. This shows the value of the idea.

          • gazter ( gazter@aussie.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Don’t forget about the inverters.

            Low voltage (such as the output from a solar panel) suffers badly from losses over distance. Centralised solar makes up for this by having a large amount of panels close to a central inverter. There is going to be a distance tipping point of cost vs losses, if this is short and you need a lot of inverters, that’s going to become a major expense.

    • Roofs are actually not that great. Installation is expensive because you are working at height. Roof angles and directions are also not ideal on many houses. Compare it to a simple installation on a field: You just take some corn field, stop growing corn there and can put your panels on some cheap holders and you’re good. You can access and service them without the danger of falling from a roof. You can install them on an industrial scale instead of a few square meters on every single roof. You need only one electrical installation.

      People love to cry about the loss of agricultural space, but currently we are growing a lot of corn to convert it to fuel or to put it into biogas installations. If you convert those field to solar, you will get more energy from them. And the loss of a big monoculture that is using a lot of pesticides is also great.

    • eleitl ( eleitl@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can lay them down and remove them again and also clean them with automation. There are power lines nearby as well as consumers, electric trains.

      Installing on roofs is manual labor and needs electricians. Which is why you see so many solar farms by the roadside.