• sp3ctr4l ( sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, see, its not semantics.

      What are these things that matter that we are fighting for?

      Preserving capitalism, just you know, we’ll fix it this time, we just have to do (thing that is guaranteed to be undone by capitalism)!…

      Or… not that, instead, identifying the instinct to do that as the entire main problem that causes or exacerbates all the other problems?

      Its only semantics if you’re in full-on capitalist realism mode, where the apocalypse is easier to imagine than the absence of capitalism.

      That’s how you get the Fallout timeline.

      I hope we understand that the Fallout timeline is bad.

      Smearing around the meaning of words is actually exactly how propoganda works. If you literally can’t even know what someone is talking about or means, well, then you basically just make stuff up willy nilly, confusion increases, meaningful discussion becomes more and more impossible, and the status quo wins.

  • Commiunism ( commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Most leftists are literally pro-capitalism though, not in the idealized sense of “we want free markets NOW!!” but viewing ideal society as capitalism but with welfare (self-described socialist/DSA/socdem types). No matter how you rename such society, it doesn’t change what it’s mode of production in reality is.

    Lots of leftists can’t even define what capitalism is either, which also puts their opposition to capital into question…

      • Commiunism ( commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Imma be real, if you truly think that US are some backwards savages and the rest of the world is any better then maybe you’re due for a break from the US-centric news cycles who only report on what’s going on in the US. It really warps one’s perspective on the current state of the world, xenophobia and bigotry runs everywhere and it’s getting worse as profit rates and standard of living drops.

        Besides, leftism as a term at first referred to anti-monarchist liberals. It’s an insanely large and diverse camp in terms of views, vast majority of whom are pro-capitalist but don’t market themselves as such since their focus is reformism and making lives better within capitalism like trans rights or “fair wage”. Actual anti-capitalists (i.e. communists aligned with left opposition who are vehemently against commodity form) are insanely rare and often don’t even identify themselves as leftists since they have very little in common with left wing of capital.

        • alapakala ( alapakala@quokk.au ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          One quick peek at my profile and you’d learn super quick I’m extremely varied, global, and intersecting as most anarchists go.

          leftism as a term at first referred to anti-monarchist liberals

          By whom exactly🙃

          Actual anti-capitalists (i.e. communists aligned with left opposition who are vehemently against commodity form) are insanely rare and often don’t even identify themselves as leftists since they have very little in common with left wing of capital.

          I feel like you believe this is /c/liberalism@lemmy.world and not /c/Socialism@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
          Could you reframe you scopes a little broader, as actual anarchists engaging in honest conversation? ’Cause anarchism is completely against all forms of capital: the privatization of goods, services, tools, land, etc… You don’t have to be furtherest liberating (Monarch’s “left of privatization”), and fall back into communitizing all means of production (communism).

          I am not your typical black anarchist.

  • アイス ( Ice@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a decent way to self-exclude yourself from relevancy in the political sphere.

    Most of the global left is not strictly anti capitalist but rather advocate more nuanced systems.

    • holy_scroller ( holy_scroller@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      How about he Sherman Antitrust Act. It is obviously left wing to oppose monopolies, and yet it fit into and supports a capitalist system. Even communist China has significant capitalist elements. Most notably, in “post capitalist” Star Trek, Jean-Luc Picard owned a fucking vineyard in France. You telling me everyone who wanted a French Vineyard got a French Vineyard?

    • 0xDREADBEEF ( dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are just stating what classical liberalism. If this isnt classical liberalism then what is the definition of classical liberalism? You should look up neo liberalism.

      Also liberals are hardly leftist since they want free markets and zero regulations. Your picture says so

      • Daftydux ( Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You are just stating what classical liberalism

        Are you asking a question?

        Liberalism is inherently left wing. In this sense im referring to autocracy vs democracy and nothing to do with capital. Big L Liberals still sit to the left in many regards. You might find some classical liberals in the conservative party but that is usually found to be faux virtue signaling, like the libraterians.

        I give zero fucks about people who identify leftist as if opposing the right side of a spectrum is some sort of virtue.

        “If youre violet then im ultraviolet”