wow, how is a conservative republican trumper even allowed on lemmy?

  • rbn ( rbn@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think it would be a big step forward if republicans used actually free social media platforms rather than those that are controlled by their leaders and heavily used for propaganda. So although I disagree with their political orientation, I’d welcome them to whatever Fediverse platform they’re interested in. Also I think it’s better if internet platforms represent everyone. Otherwise Lemmy may turn into (and partially might be already) an echo chamber for green, left ideas. Having a safe space is great, but I think it’s also good to keep in mind that we don’t have a statistically representative audience here.

    • i have a feeling you’re using the word “republicans” to refer to the party of john mccain. which died with him.

      what we have now is fascism. when i see someone simping for anyone running for office with R next to their name, it’s not what you’d call a “discussion.”

      • John McCain was a POW and he may have served honourably in the US military, but he wasn’t some paragon of virtue. Wasn’t he a big part of the Birther movement (the ones who tried to push the idea that Barack Obama was not a bona fide American citizen because his father was born in Kenya and some suggested he was as well)?

        If we’re going back some years, we could use the Republicans’ own words and call them the party of Lincoln, though every Republican who voted for Abraham Lincoln likely would have voted for Barack Obama, and more recently, against Donald Trump. The Republicans were the progressive party back then and the Democrats (under whom the Klan was founded) were the conservative party. Conservatives today like to remind people of that, but they don’t like it when we point out that the two parties swapped ideals and platforms long before any of us were born.

    • I disagree, I think smaller communities are more sustainable and defederation should occur more, not less. I like discussing common interests and digging deeper into a topic both users have a shared basic understanding of. For example, allowing and even promoting people to come into a community like WomensStuff and argue against some pretty basic feminist ideas is really not what that community is made for. There are so many more examples of this, but without fail the end result is discouragement of minority opinions and people who are truly passionate about their chosen communities.

      • rbn ( rbn@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Having safe spaces (which is absolutely fine and up to the mods of the community) doesn’t mean that other people that contradict the idea of said safe spaces shouldn’t use the Fediverse in general.

        They could host their own Nazi instance of Lemmy and do whatever they want rather than using X or truth social or whatever. I obviously still don’t like these people and their ideas, but I prefer them discussing it without being additionally manipulated by intransparent algorithms and corporations. Of course, other instances can (and probably will in many cases) decide to defederate the Nazi server or block specific users or communities as it’s done today.

        @Z745812939054@lemmy.zip

        • doesn’t mean that these people shouldn’t use the Fediverse in general.

          I’m not arguing that at all; defederation does not affect somebody’s ability to host an instance. Everything I said can be equally applied to all communities.

          • rbn ( rbn@sopuli.xyz ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Could you please elaborate what you meant with your disagreement then? Seems to me that we agree here. I did not mean to say that everyone should be welcomed in every community and share whatever opinion/content they want. I was just talking about Platforms as in X, Truth Social or in case of the Fediverse Mastodon, Lemmy, Loops etc.

      • I think smaller communities are more sustainable and defederation should occur more, not less.

        In this case, why bother with the Fediverse in the first place and why should we not go back to the forums of yesteryear?

        • rbn ( rbn@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          I still like the idea of forums and still use a bunch of them, but different forums being somewhat compatible to each other has quite some advantages from my perspective. For me it would be great concept of having independent websites that can exchange data via ActivityPub and people can either visit the website or consume the content from another instance and with their app of choice.

    • I think it would be a big step forward if republicans used actually free social media platforms rather than those that are controlled by their leaders and heavily used for propaganda.

      Good idea. All parties should do the same thing. Any party that only sticks to platforms used for propaganda and echo chambers is a problem. People need to think for themselves, form their own opinions, and stop treating party lines like religious doctrine. Regardless of what side of the aisle they are on. Information is power.

  • For one, it sounds like he did you a favour if his idols are Trump and Musk.

    Two, everyone’s allowed on Lemmy. Someone supports paedophilia and war crimes, you could just block them. In this case it looks like the trash took itself out.

    Also, there is/was a MAGA instance. Almost everyone immediately defederated from it. Just like how Truth Social (Trump’s social network) is based on Mastodon, but most Mastodon instances defederated from it (or Truth Social was altered to not federate; I’m not sure).