• Carrot ( Carrot@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think people cared less about Nintendo’s case because they allow 3rd parties to make physical games that are just a digital key, but they won’t release any first party games that way. (Not exactly convinced they won’t eventually change this policy, but that’s what it is right now)

  • What they want is software as a service. They want to end game ownership entirely and push gamers into a mandatory subscription. They want to have all games in a catalog like a streaming service that you download to your console to play. They want to sell extra access passes for new and popular games.

    They want gamers to pay for a $1,000+ console, subscribe to a $20+ a month game library and $40 passes for new games that have not yet been released to the library. They want gamers to pay for online access as well and want the ability to brick a console for cheating, modification, piracy, or user account bans.

    They will succeed too. Gamers make a bunch of noise, but it’s all sound and fury signifying nothing. They won’t boycott or protest. They will make a bunch of angry memes, write a few articles, spend some time on social media like reddit or lemmy that they would never admit is social media, and then fight scalpers and crowds to get one.

    • architect ( architect@thelemmy.club ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Gamers are weak willed and easily manipulated. Look at what they (bannon) accomplished through world of Warcraft. Look at gamer gate! 5 people pushed that lie and gamers carried it into every fucking space for them. They are good dogs for the right wing. They think buying a game from a shitty company on sale is a protest. We should make fun of them more for their lack of self respect.

  • cockmushroom ( cockmushroom@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because they won’t be forced to lower the sale pricenin proportion with the lowered production cost.

    We sold our futures for magic beans when we decided it was “fair” for a store to charge paying customers extra to cover losses incurred from theft.

      • cockmushroom ( cockmushroom@reddthat.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Since you seem to need someone to spell it out for you: the point is that they’re doing it because they won’t be charging any less. And you’re almost right; devopment costs don’t affect production costs very much at all.

  • reksas ( reksas@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    because what you buy is what you support. and a lot of people support this shit. Buying stuff from companies should be viewed as sign of endorsement of their actions.

  • architect ( architect@thelemmy.club ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Games going digital is not a fucking dystopia. Jesus Christ there are people being killed and put in jail for moving a box. Get a fucking grip and quit fucking buying their garbage.

  • jay ( jay@pie.zerojay.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You don’t need to do anything to “turn your physical game into a digital one”, because the same package you deliver for a physical game to 1st parties are used the same way for digital downloads.