• t3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s exactly what it says, but people living under any superpower’s sphere of cultural influence (Western, Eastern, or otherwise) are clearly prone to see their government’s actions as good and non-authoritarian.

        • It kind of is, but that doesn’t make it bad? Like, traffic has a massive scale, and controlling it means controlling at least that aspect of society and all of the downstream societal effects. That’s… good? The state should be controlling some aspects of society on a massive scale, because the state’s scale is massive.

            • queermunist she/her ( queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Right, but efficient operation of traffic has downstream effects on all of society. One idea I’ve had is if monitoring traffic allowed for the state to mandate that every work place had their quitting times staggered out, so, factory A closes at 5:25 and factory B closes at 5:35 and factory C closes at 5:45 etc etc. That way, there don’t need to be traffic jams, because society is organized in a rational way according to everyone’s needs.

              Social control on a massive scale (good)