This is so true tho
You must log in or # to comment.
Ronald is indescribably more important than any tech billionaire could ever hope to be. So let’s raise a glass and give out a hardy thank you to all the Ronalds of the world!
Bless Ronald
deleted by creator
Not sure if it’s part of the joke but that word means “jerk” (as in “jerk off”) in Swedish.
So a perfect open source name then.
Most likely is. Many open source projects have a joke as a name, often containing some form of innuendo or a double meaning. Helps in maintaining the free nature of the tool (corporations don’t want anything to do with it) as well as lower expectations on professionalism. Plus it’s funny, especially if it’s an in-joke of a niche language.
On the topic of “runk”, it’s also been loaned from Swedish to Finnish as runkata, or to runk = to jerk off. The actual act of it would be runkkaus or runkkaaminen. Can also be encountered in the form runkkari, aka a wanker (I’d assume Swedish had a matching equivalent). So the joke works in Finnish as well.
Fabrice Bellard is ten Ronalds.
deleted by creator
and tcc, which while maybe not as ‘important’, is extremely cool.
Is QEMU simply a VM?
It’s basically the best virtualization platform. It can do full system emulation across a number of platforms, or hardware assisted virtualization (using KVM). It’s incredibly useful for debug as well as doing real work.
deleted by creator
This is why when Steve Jobs died in 2011 another far more important figure died… Dennis Ritchie. The man who made the C programming language and Unix, without which nothing Apple produced would be possible.
Not to downplay dmr’s importance here because he quite literally is the father of modern computing, but without him we’d just have something else and perhaps it would’ve been a bit later. A different systems programming language and a different operating system everything else is modeled after. High-level programming languages weren’t a new concept when he wrote C. Before B they already had Fortran. Funny to call any of those High-level in 2026, but that’s the whole importance of C, isn’t it? It made writing complex systems easy compared to assembly languages or even fortran.
I’m not gonna bother doing a writeup about Jobs, we all here know he made precisely Jack shit.
Apple used Pascal up until the System 7 era anyway, C was just one of many choices of the time.
If we didn’t have C, we’d probably have eliminated things like buffer overflows and out of bounds memory accesses decades ago.
Oh wow I didn’t realize Pascal was even older than C, thought it showed up in like mid-70s or early 80s. To be fair I’ve ever only interacted with Delphi, not OG Pascal.
While I don’t necessarily like C, I am happy for C-style syntax over Pascal-style, which I’ve also worked with. Give me braces over begin and end any day of the week.
I’m not gonna bother doing a writeup about Jobs, we all here know he made precisely Jack shit.
He made money, and enemies who couldn’t actually do anything about it.
My go to real example is curl
Christopher’s Universal Request Library
In case anyone thinks you’re serious, that’s not what it stands for.
Yeah, its just Chris, dude HATES when people call him Christopher.
The myth of Steve Jobs needed the actual genius of others to exist. Steve’s gift to the world was recognizing and pointing out actual gifts tonthe world that would have otherwise gone unoticed or not brought to their full potential.
If Steve was still around, he would have taken Ronald’s idea and had it rebuilt with a little polish and an exorbitant price tag.
And scrubbed it of any mention of Ronald’s name before pulling it out onstage. Don’t forget that.
For a long time all systems which deal with timezone data (like ability to convert utc to est for example) was reliant on 1 server in 1 random guy’s basement which he paid for himself. I heard they were working to correct this situation but haven’t been following it.
You sent me down the exact kind of weird rabbit hole I love. Genuinely thank you.
It’s maintained by the IANA now (the same people who basically run the modern Internet, saying what domains are allowed and such for those who don’t know). Though Arthur David Olson (the man you mentioned) still contributes his expertise and data.
The amount of businesses with things you just can’t touch for whatever reason is surprising.
The reliance on something made that is barely understood by the entire company makes me think that society will drag on generations after any kind of societal collapse.
Social collapse isn’t an exciting day in your life, it’s a broad trend historians will puzzle over centuries later. Look at the bronze age collapse for an example.
Some dude in the year 2345 will be shitposting about how we didn’t see it coming because we are dumb.
We did see it coming, but we are dumb
Yeah, and things can putter on for hundreds of years before they really “collapse”
That sounds like a ‘crunch’ category risk
Or more things will happen like the Bhopal disaster where a chemical plant, over a decade or so, laid off or failed to replace everyone who knew what their carefully designed multi-layered safety systems did. When those systems aged and needed maintenance, the remaining production people took them out one by one. Then 500,000 people were gassed with cyanide. 2,200 immediate deaths. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster
deleted by creator
I think it’s worth noting there’s few people like Jobs and more like Gates but they’re all psychopaths.
Those were both exploitative business men more than engineers or developers. Jobs wasn’t special and there’re reasons why Microsoft boosted Gates to be the richest person in the world at one point.
my impression is that gates was doing some pretty impressive computer programming for a good stint in his early days…
Its almost like his name was Dennis Richie and its a shame a blow hard like Jobs died around the same time as him and overshadowed his passing and his legendary legacy.
The first examples are consequential in the same way Voldemort was.
They’re villains created by transphobes?
Self-made men 'n’all!
On top of it all, Steve Jobs wasn’t even in tech. He was in sales.
