• Em Adespoton ( adespoton@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because our culture has spent the past 250 years attempting to minimize the value of empathy.

    That’s something that always drives me crazy about the “value of the atomic family” schtick in some conservative circles. On the one hand, they want a return to the atomic family. On the other, they’re still full steam ahead on individualism and keeping empathy out of decision processes.

    Meanwhile, other family-based cultures are messy, more “molecular family” than the “traditional” atomic family, because the culture is based on empathy and shame/honor. Without empathy, leadership always dehumanizes the ones it is supposed to serve.

  • I care about it a great deal.

    But if you want a hypothesis for your question…

    I think its because, as primates, we feel a desire to punish our enemies. It an emotional impulse, and therefore gets a power buff in its influence over our beliefs compared to being reasonable and fostering understanding. The empathetic leader is perceived to lack in their capabilities for delivering punishment.

    Control is why we (the society) are discouraged from developing the skills to be reasonable in the first place.

    • orbitz ( orbitz@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      In current situation but imagine a world where country leaders could show empathy? I only word it that way because some leaders appear to have it but there’s only so much they can do when the other elected reps decide it’s not worthwhile. I wonder so much why it’s basically a four letter word (so to say) among some groups.

      Basically it’s the trait you want in leaders but doesn’t make much side money for people doing proper governing. What a shit system cause they all pour honey in our ears how things will be fantastic if just one group was blamed. Horeshit though.