When I think about it, didn’t know ferals were allowed https://lemmit.online/c/feral_yiff I’m still cool with it tho!
That’s a reddit mirror, not a proper lemmy community. Nobody can post to that. And proper link would be !feral_yiff@lemmit.online
(Seems like the lemmit bot died a few days ago due to changes on reddit’s side.)
Cheers! And yap. Thanks for explaining.
Huff… Lucky boy… Wish I took his place -w-
Well…
But how did they even get into that position, it’s not like the dog can just wrap the leash around Loimu.
That is the point (which I should made more clear in retrospect): IMO the sexual depiction between animal and furry is problematic at best. The crosses in the table show which combinations should never be made in a (even fictional) sexual context.
I generally think as much as possible should be allowed in fantasy (settings). There are many things which better stay in fantasy. But especially purely fictive creatures definitely stay there.
That “is kinda weird” part of the matrix tries to effectively push things into ❌ but without giving a reason. That is guilt tripping, which itself is a manipulation technique.
I am on the side of the linked blog (‘Neither pedophile (“cub”) nor bestiality/zoophilia art are okay, because they normalize sexual abuse.’). Still I can agree with you that we disagree (which doesn’t mean that I dislike you for this).
but without giving a reason
The reason comes from the context of the preceding part of the blog, specifically the mention of the Harkness Test and general elaboration about where the ability to give consent of a being ends.
