Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Nemeski ( nemeski@mander.xyz )  to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months ago

Zoom update triggers privacy risk by slurping Linux clipboards

www.neowin.net

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
122
external-link

Zoom update triggers privacy risk by slurping Linux clipboards

www.neowin.net

Nemeski ( nemeski@mander.xyz )  to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
Just a moment...
www.neowin.net
external-link
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • artyom ( artyom@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah this is why Zoom is constantly pushing you to download their fucking app, and exactly why I don’t fucking do it.

    • iocase ( iocase@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same with discord… it lives inside a browser tab only

  • IanTwenty ( IanTwenty@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    Affected users who are running X11 should audit their Zoom version, isolate conferencing workloads onto dedicated hardware or virtual machines, or move to a browser-based version of Zoom where sandboxing prevents unprompted clipboard access.

    Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

    • Maybelline ( Maybelline@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      Anyone running a Linux system with Wayland should be OK.

      And this is exactly why I put up with the functionality regressions of Wayland over X11 for the first few years.

      • ikidd ( ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s been quite a while since I’ve had issues with Wayland, but for a while there I was convinced that the only testing done on it was on a single screen laptop, because as soon as you attached a second standalone monitor (or third or fourth) all hell broke loose.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB) ( vk6flab@lemmy.radio ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I understood that all X11 apps running under Wayland are running inside the same environment, or is that wrong?

      In other words, all X11 clipboards are shared.

      I’m also not sure about clipboard isolation, since I’d have thought that copy/paste between Wayland and X11 would be expected.

      • HER0 ( HER0@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Wayland spec doesn’t allow for clients to arbitrarily get clipboard data under typical conditions. Since most applications these days are running under Wayland, it should be that copying to the clipboard isn’t exposed to X11 clients most of the time (only when copying from or pasting into XWayland).

    • thingsiplay ( thingsiplay@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also Flatpak would be helpful in this case too, if there was a package for.

    • techsenslavingus ( afterthewar@lemmus.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you. This is the summary I needed.

  • eleijeep ( eleijeep@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stallman was right.

    • curbstickle ( curbstickle@anarchist.nexus ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      On some things.

      On others he couldn’t be more wrong.

    • macniel ( DmMacniel@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean yes, but why this time?

  • Not a newt ( lemmyng@piefed.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Would the sandbox permissions in Flatpak be able to block this?

    • defrostedLasagna4921 ( defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think so, but the sandbox can easily be broken in theory from what I heard. It’ll probably be fine as long as Zoom doesn’t add malicious code that does such a thing.

  • Cousin Mose ( undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why is Zoom even still popular? Remember when Apple had to push a security update to undo its insane HTTP daemon? I guess we’re all just okay trusting their janky-ass Windows adjacent UI and security model.

    • thingsiplay ( thingsiplay@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why is Zoom even still popular?

      I guess because that’s a standard tool everyone in business has. Also the Microsoft alternatives (including Skype after buyout) sucks. I don’t use these tools (used Skype before Microsoft purchased it), so this is not my personal opinion.

    • hexagonwin ( hexagonwin@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      jitsi is good feature wise, but it’s not widely advertised…

      • k0e3 ( k0e3@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

    • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      this. my last companies security team was crazy aggressive but would allow zoom meetings right after the big security incident.

    • k0e3 ( k0e3@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t even understand how it goes popular in the first place when Skype and Google Meet already existed before the Pandemic. It even had a whole “Chinese company/servers” scare too but it still held on.

Linux@programming.dev

linux@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !linux@programming.dev

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

  • !linux_memes@programming.dev
  • !linuxphones@lemmy.ca
  • our Matrix group chat
  • !reactos@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 65 users / day
  • 782 users / week
  • 2.3K users / month
  • 5.73K users / 6 months
  • 127 local subscribers
  • 15.3K subscribers
  • 4.5K Posts
  • 23.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ategon ( Ategon@programming.dev ) 
  • adr1an ( anzo@programming.dev ) 
  • dwraf_of_ignorance ( dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code