“What did it cost?”
“The yearly energy consumption of a median household and $1,000”
Don’t forget the water usage
Removed by mod
Counting energy consumption by a programmer’s children as a cost of code generation? That’s the most capitalist thing I’ve read in a month!
Removed by mod
Jesus Christ.
Yes but how many billable hours did they get for this 320-minute ordeal?
Spending $1000 on transportation costs commuting to and from work over a span of 2-4 years is completely different from burning through $1000 dollars of tokens in a single workday.
Especially if the boss now demands the same amount of output from you every day as the new normal.
And that’s not to mention how the energy and water consumption happens on a much shorter timescale than the drawn out one you needed to cite to make it seem comparable.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I’m not much of a gambling man myself, but you do you
Removed by mod
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away. — Antoine de Saint-Exupére
+55653, -937? That is not beauty, even if it all “worked”.
It is wild that Anthropic decided to go with “Claude”, as in “Claude Shannon”, as in the guy who formally proved that information degrades every time it passes through a channel that can’t represent it in a mathematically reversible way.
If you can’t theoretically produce the original code, given the “refactored” code… congratulations, you have lost information.
+55653
Says everything I need to know about the change.
I bet it’s like 5 different versions of the same thing. The exact opposite of modularized.
If the movie Tron were true, or The Matrix, and code was alive and sentient, things like this would be horror on the level of the Star Trek: TMP transporter accident.
It’s beyond spaghetti code. We need a new word for it: Cthulhu code
Removed by mod
You sound like such a fucking loser it is incredible.
AI fanatics will never cease to amaze me in unpleasant ways.
Ah yes the good ol asaert(true);
