• Mark with a Z ( markz@suppo.fi ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    24 days ago

    Doesn’t look like a decomp, but a vibecoded clone. A decomp would get sued into oblivion anyway.

    I highly doubt this will ever replace the originals, but Adobe would deserve that.

    • BooBees ( BooBees@fedinsfw.app ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 days ago

      If those apps have all the same tools fully functionally integrated, there’s absolutely zero chance it was vibe coded. It would take longer to vibe code than to remake it by hand, in order to get all of them working together properly. Vibe coding isn’t there yet.

    • moth ( moth@anarchist.nexus ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      if it’s a clean room implementation they can sue, but they won’t necessarily win. anthropic gave up when claude was translated to rust because none of their code or assets were used, so they had no standing to object to the software itself existing.

      this is the same sort of issue john deere has with open source diagnostic software, and nintendo has with some emulators. it’s not illegal to copy features so long as you don’t reuse any assets. a complete rewrite of photoshop in rust might just get away with it. you can be sure adobe will be pouring over their source for the slimmest bit of their IP. and of course, even if they would lose, there’s nothing stopping them from dragging the other party through the courts just to ruin them financially.

    • the open source rebuilds that were made in days are buggy and a bit broken at present.

      I think it could be both. They decompiled it, likely with the help of an llm, and then vibe coded a reimplementation in rust. They claim ‘clean-room reimplementation’ on github, but I’m not so sure this would be considered clean room. I don’t know, tho, let’s wait for the lawyers and judges to say.

    • Sina ( Sina@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Gimp is useful software for certain cases, but it’s not really a Photoshop competitor or alternative. Maybe it could be if someone added the missing features, but I don’t see that happen anytime soon.

  • FaceDeer ( FaceDeer@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 days ago

    So all of a sudden hooray for AI, who cares about the water and carbon emissions and “theft” and whatnot?

    It was never really about those things in the first place, I’m guessing.

    • moth ( moth@anarchist.nexus ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 days ago

      moth supposes none of the people here are serious about using the vibed versions, and are only finding amusement at something bad happening to a very shitty corporation.

      it’s not really different than laughing about MAGA eating each other. just because one might think it’s funny senator foghorn leghorn called trump an asshole, doesn’t mean one endorses him in any way. sometimes it’s just funny to laugh at bad people’s misfortune.

  • anarcat ( anarcat@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    For anyone that’s interested, it is vibe-coded slop. I installed their photoshop clone, pasted in a picture, tried curves, and the text tool. Curves would only show up in the side panel, and it didn’t feel like it was making the colors do what they should. Trying to select text after you’ve typed it makes it disappear. Trying to change the font relied on a dropdown that (unlike PS), doesn’t show you what each typeface looks like, and you can’t scroll through the dropdown, you just have to manually choose one font at a time.

    This ain’t it. You’re better off with Krita, Gimp, or even Photopea.

  • I cannot comment on this specific case because I have not looked at the source code or products, but there’s a bigger story here that most people are missing. In the last week, LLMs have been used to decompile multiple video games into human-readable source code that can be easily modified by humans or LLMs. These have resulted in projects mixing elements from Mario, Elden Ring, Minecraft, etc. LLMs are now able to decompile software into usable source (and check if said source compiles to match the original, on a loop).

    I am struggling to wrap my mind around the consequences of this development. It basically means that all commercial, closed-source software can now be pirated and modified at will, assuming you have the money to pay for LLM tokens for the decompilation process.