Why the absolute fuck are unnecessary surgeries being done at all. Insane! On a 7 year old child! That would be horrific to endure at that age. (Shouldn’t be done unless necessary at any age in my opinion, but)
Just yank his medical license, and put him in and the mother in jail.
Fucking psychos
Yank his penis
This is the fourth medical tribunal Mehat has faced.
In March 2019, he was suspended for one month when his fitness to practice was determined to be impaired, due to Nottingham City Council cautioning him for numerous offences in relation to rental properties he owned.
Then, in September 2019, he was suspended for one month because he circumcised a baby without his mother’s consent.
At the time, the MPTS decided there was a “very low risk of repetition” and “no risk to patients” by allowing him to continue working.
Huh
At the time, the MPTS decided there was a “very low risk of repetition” and “no risk to patients” by allowing him to continue working.
Well the MPTS clearly decided very wrongly
Low risk to patients
High risk to foreskin
Kid had to be taken to the emergency room in the middle of the night, a bit more than low risk there.
7·2 days agoit should be legal for anyone to do anything they want to this doctors genitals.
I don’t know what they are, but I would like to install an arduino right in the middle.
A doctor circumcised a seven-year-old boy without seeking his opinion and without his father’s consent, a medical tribunal has heard.
Aren’t circumcisions already often done for religious reasons on infants that can’t consent? The only different bit here is that only one of the parents consented this time.
Given the child doesn’t normally get a say in this no matter what, why act like they care about the child’s opinion now?
Edit: Read the article properly, the boy’s mother is the one that forced this through, so she did consent - which I think actually makes the above more prudent.
