Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
alessandro ( alessandro@lemmy.ca )  to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 days ago

Google Chrome 0-Day Vulnerability in the Wild to Execute Malicious Code Remotely

cybersecuritynews.com

external-link
message-square
6
link
fedilink
56
external-link

Google Chrome 0-Day Vulnerability in the Wild to Execute Malicious Code Remotely

cybersecuritynews.com

alessandro ( alessandro@lemmy.ca )  to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
6
link
fedilink
Google has fixed a Chrome zero-day that attackers are already using. The flaw is tracked as CVE-2026-125350, and it lets a remote attacker run malicious code in the browser.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • asudox ( asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Would Rust have prevented this

    • FishFace ( FishFace@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Use-after-free? Almost certainly.

    • aldhissla ( aldhissla@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does using Rust magically make LLM products non-sloppy?

      I guess not.

  • FiniteBanjo ( FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    lol damn that sucks

    • tempest ( tempest@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      For people dumb enough to be using Chrome, sure.

      Should have been obvious that it’d be a security problem well before they banned and blockers.

      • FiniteBanjo ( FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        For people dumb enough to be using Chrome, including doctors, lawyers, government buildings, landlords, therapists, constructions companies, logistics, refineries, banks, investment firms, engineers, manufacturers, retailers, payment portals, and literally every single person everywhere for associating or doing business with any of them as a result, sure.

        FTFY

        Even if you and I do things safely an responsibly, we’re at the whims of the fuckups of greater society.

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !pcgaming@lemmy.ca

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 657 users / day
  • 1.74K users / week
  • 3.37K users / month
  • 5.81K users / 6 months
  • 276 local subscribers
  • 15.9K subscribers
  • 7.68K Posts
  • 28K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • EXiLE ( EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca ) 
  • Uncle ( UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca ) 
  • KairuByte ( KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code