• lntl ( lntl@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s a GPL license thing. If you make a derivative work of GPL code, you’re NOT free to do what you want with it. This is where the 'anti come from.

      • lntl ( lntl@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        This happens from time to time. The offending party either removes the GPL code or they GPL the work. That’s life ;)

              • lntl ( lntl@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                It’s may be possible to tell if there is GPL code included whether or not the source is reveal. A simple example is that some plain-text strings are visible in compiled binaries. In this way, poking around with a hexeditor may reveal strings which indicate part of the code is GPL.

                • God ( god@sh.itjust.works ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Hmmm. Thankfully I only develop small services and haven’t done any big monolith that people wanna audit. When I get to that point I’ll prolly get sued and then try to figure out what to do while profusely apologizing and denying at the same time.

    • sydneybrokeit ( sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      There are two parts to this. On one side, you have the “please follow the GPL if you’re using GPL code” – which is really just asking someone to honor a contract, more or less.

      Then you have people like RMS, who believe that there should not be such a thing as proprietary software. They don’t care if you aren’t using the GPL – no software should be proprietary, period.

        • sydneybrokeit ( sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, RMS provides the tension in a system that needs a balance between fully open and fully proprietary. HIs vision of the world is honestly pretty untenable, but the work he does pulls in a direction the world needs pulled.