I wouldn’t. Immortality sounds miserable to me.

  • 667 ( 667@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    There are arguments which state that when you “transfer” consciousness, there is no continuity of consciousness, meaning we are at best making a copy and destroying the original. While your copy would wake up as though nothing happened, the original you gets destroyed in the process and never actually gets to enjoy the transference.

  • Narrrz ( Narrrz@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m already a robot, merely one made of biological, somewhat self- repairing components, which unfortunately are very difficult to replicate in any way besides procreation, and distinctly non- trivial to switch out even when a replacement is available. If the only thing changing is the ease with which failing parts can be replaced, then he’ll yes i would. I think any sane person would, or at least should. The only reason to say no would be the assumption of certain things associated with robots as stereotyped in media, but not necessarily specified in the actual question.

    • QHC ( QHC@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Agree. If it was indistinguishable from my meat bag body, then absolutely! If there was significant reduction in my senses, I would consider it but would probably want to stay in my human body as long as it was viable. If there was like contemporary VR where it’s just visual and audio but no taste or touch or smell… nah dawg. I think that would be more akin to eternal torture.

      Actually, maybe I would agree to the robot body under condition that someone wake me up every 100 hours for a few days. I would like to time travel to the far future and see how human society develops over time, but living through all that time as just a brain that can watch TV is not worth sating my curiosity.

  • Immortality means no obligations to complete tasks by any deadline, which means I’ll never get anything done and will procrastinate until the heat death of the universe. I’ll stick with the flesh body, thanks.

    • s804 ( s804@kbin.social ) BannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      i really hope thats the case. but knowing people, it would be hard to do that. maybe they will find ways to duplicate you and do experiments or torture for entertainment. feels scary to me

  • Bimfred ( Bimfred@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Nope. I have my doubts if it’d be immortality for me or a separate consciousness that believes it’s me. The distinction wouldn’t matter to literally anyone except me, but where it matters, it REALLY matters.

  • Immortality? Probably not. Transfer? Probably also no.

    Yes, if it were just my brain in a resilient robot body that can take care of my brain. Particularly with nerve connection (though contextual) and being able to exist in different forms easily (different sizes/environments, buildings, digital presence). Minisub or anything in space sounds like a fun time.

    VR head-space too, particularly as a personal thing for down-time (use computer, practice skills, AI personality consultation), not a digital-real-estate thing.

    If it were an option (no problem of money/law) I’d sign up for cryonics testing. Though I’d definitely want an anti-dystopia contract (hopefully with some science+pro-people+pro-environment institution) and probably wouldn’t want my brain to be revived in USA.