• I’ve seen some here openly despair that leaving reddit didn’t do anything.

    Spez, CEO of Reddit and former mod of the r/jailbait subreddit losing his shit very publically for days proves otherwise.

    …And it’s also a reminder that the reddit community we loved has already been destroyed by ownership, anyone returning would be returning to a shadow that disdains its own users.

    • it took them less then a week to go from “were a community” to “shut up and do as your told”. fuck that and them. whether kbin or lemmy works out only the future knows so far but im done with reddit.

    • Even if the protest fails to produce capitulation from Reddit, it still effectively drove a fuckton of traffic into the Fediverse, which is a goal worth pursuing in itself. If corporations won’t comply, then building workable alternatives is option 2.

    • In view of comments about restoration of deleted data, I had a look at the user agreement for NON EEU and it says "When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content. tldr; they do not have to honor content deletion in the US. But I feel better that I deleted it, maybe it will be a little bit of pain to restore it. I will go back occasionally and re-delete if neeeded.

  • Not for nothing, but a key feature of fascism is that you’re “enemy” is both weak and strong at the same time.

    So the blackout is not a big deal AND the mods coordinating the blackout are too powerful…

    ACAB - All CEOs Are Bastards

  • I really wish users, who are the only ones that bring real value to a site like Reddit, could vote out the CEO. I guess we are voting with our feet, but it’s a shame that we have to go through this stupid lather/rinse/repeat cycle with every user contribution site.

  • Funny. That is a feature I wanted for a long time. Question is how in the world will it be implemented. Probably going to pull another Elon and only allow Reddit premium members to vote. Kinda shows the blackout is working and he is trying to find a ‘good’ PR way to weasel his way out.

    • Unfortunately, I can’t think of any way you could implement a voting feature for mods that wouldn’t be abused. There are bots that would be inevitably able to vote in anyone they want

      Also being a mod is difficult and you will have to make unpopular decisions. Sometimes the person you took action on will misrepresent what happened or outright lie to sway public opinion against you. People will take advantage of that to vote a mod out.

      Do you have some way to prevent abuse like that happening?

      • It also doesn’t account for the difference between what the anonymous mass of lurkers want, and what the people who actually post and comment and contribute to the sub want.

        • This conversation reminds me of difficulties in real life politics, especially on the local level. Something that always struck me in how it’s spoken about is that the preferences of the “lurkers” are often presented in opposition to the “active users”, when the entire problem is that it’s hard to tell what the mass of people want.

          I suppose it’s different here though. On Reddit, the lurkers can be assumed to be okay with the status quo, but in politics, people who don’t vote or engage with politics may be the complete opposite

    • Unless there is some kind of cooldown time (but even then), mods will constantly change…

      Group A votes Mod B off and places Mod A there. Group B doesn’t like that and votes Mod A off and places Mod B (or a similar) back.

      The longer that goes on, the more users (and even Mods) will get annoyed and leave that sub. There will probably the be originalsub, splitsubA, splitsubB. All of these subs will be weaker than the originalsub was before.

      So basically the same what we see in current politics. Instead of finding a solution together, it just creates larger gaps between the members.

      It feels less like democracy but more like temporary dictatorship that oscillates between opinions.

      A better solution would be to have multiple mods with different opinions finding consensus together. But that’s easier said than done…

  • Based on the reporting two things seem clear to me: (1) the commercial value of Reddit is fundamentally a question of selling data access; and (2) the major subreddits will be made to continue operations come Hell or high water.

    When (not if) Reddit circumvents the blackout by force, the obvious next move is to poison the well—make the data worthless by drowning it in noise (AI-generated, if you’ve a flair for the poetic). I doubt that will happen since (a) it would require coordination among a substantially larger and more dispersed userbase than the moderators and (b) it’s something of a nuclear option, but it’s an interesting idea.

  • It is almost like we can’t trust a for-profit owned social media site to have our interests as their first priority. I don’t know what this CEO is doing but it’s hard to see a bright future for Reddit in any case. Its too bad for the community but it is really too bad for those working there.

    • Really, it’s totally in the category “when you’re getting something for free, you’re not the audience, but rather the product.”

      When people failed to buy in very deeply to the tchotchkes to “pay” for Reddit, it was the last gasp of any effort other than wholesaling the dataset to advertisers and anyone willing to pay for the content.

      My break from Reddit wasn’t driven by any one single act, but rather the continued (and organized) sanitization of the Internet to appease conservative, Christian investors who make demands on the morality of the content of a site.

  • I do think it must be hard for some of the mods. Me I can just walk away from this madness. Mods if you have put your heart and soul into it… well harder. Still how can it be much clearer. Time to move on for them too.

        • Easier said than done. I doubt the decision to move to another place would be unanimous. If I were in a sub that decided to move someplace else, I wouldn’t join if they were migrating to a site I don’t like for whatever reason. Another example: some subs that migrated here still have active communities in reddit and members that didn’t join the migration. For a small sub, that hurts more.

          People value things differently.

      • Yeah I love the subreddit I moderate and haven’t felt ready to “pull the plug” and walk away completely, though I’m putting up more boundaries around the time I put in to moderating, and have created an account here to start exploring Reddit alternatives, especially if this API thing ends up being step one (or maybe more like step five lol) of a larger “enshittification” process. More broadly speaking I feel like I’ve seen stuff like this happen enough times online to realize that the profit incentive itself is just harmful, so I want to support and be a part of communities that aren’t ultimately going to ruin themselves for the sake of profit

        • Yeah this is definitely step 5 type of deal. A while ago, they stopped adding api features for apps. So most apps couldn’t add any functionality. And not only that but even if you do somehow keep access to the api, you can’t do so with NSFW content. So they also took away something from api access.

          Then there was the thing where apps couldn’t start with the name Reddit (like Reddit Boost had to turn into Boost for Reddit). I think Reddit is Fun was okay because it sounded less like an official app and just describing reddit or something. Not sure why they got to keep it.

          The whole new reddit redesign to feel more like Facebook is just gross.

          All the 9,000+ awards that meant nothing? Like you get a free one a day and maybe you get the wholesome one so you ironically give that award to a post about dying animals or something. So many posts just have so many random “awards” that it just feels like jingling keys in front of us to keep us engaged.

          Reddit may not be dead yet. Maybe not for a while. But I’m not going to be holding on to the very last second. It’s been getting worse for a long time and this was just a good excuse to jump before it gets worse.

          It will be fun to see what changes they make to moderators due to the blackout of this highly unpopular decision that they refuse to back down from.

      • Yeah, it was hard enough for me to walk away from my small hobby subs as a user, I can’t imagine the difficulty as a moderator. They’re usually some of the most invested in the subject to want to become a moderator in the first place, and then they’ve devoted all the time and energy to it for the love of the community. I don’t envy them either.

  • Interesting that he mentions that CEOs can be removed by their shareholders, which is quite similar to how reddit currently works-mods can be removed by reddit itself. The “users voting mods out” analogue in the business world would be employees having to power to vote out and replace their CEOs.

    Person with power: CEO::mod

    Those who make money off of them: shareholders::reddit

    Those who provide the content: workers::posters/commenters

    End users: customers::advertisers

    Sounds to me like spez just made a pretty compelling aruguement that his employees should be able to vote him out!

    *edited for formatting

    • I adore the way you think, sincerely. Wouldn’t that be a wonderful world, where employees could vote management/leadership out of their positions?

      What a fantastic idea.

      Again, sincerely, no sarcasm!

        • I would not have guessed that it would have a name. … I mean, I should have.

          Thank you for supplying me with a rabbit hole from which I’m unlikely to surface anytime soon.

          I did a little research and it sounds like that’s definitely a very important part of anarco syndicalism. Is it truly the main feature of it?

          • Glad I could help! Like all things there’s more to it, but the basic concept is to fire all bosses and have the workers run all the work places as a co-op. Personally, I believe this would end ‘greedflation’ and definitely make the world a better place :)

            • I mean you could still have greedy workers, but they’d be responsible for their destiny. The co-op could price their products or services out of reach of customers and consumers, but sharing the fruits of their labor shares that responsibility.

            • I feel it would make more sense to do it like the Romans did, compelled leadership by round robin IIRC. That, or elected leadership. I think it’s important to have a focused job that does decision making for the good of the group.

              Anarchy never really appealed to me. It always felt like a lot of anxiety. Also I suspect that our species won’t survive unless we can all unite, so there’s that…

              Edit: Also, forgot to link, Robert Reich on inflation and corporate profits.

      • There is a company in switzerland (i think?) that does it. So the employees vote on whos gonna be boss for the next year and whos gonna get hired and all that stuff, not just voting out.

        I have seen a documentary about it and they all were VERY happy to work in that enrivonment