According to their website, Publications owned by GAMURS Group include:
Destructoid
The Escapist
Siliconera
Twinfinite
Dot Esports
Upcomer
Gamepur
Prima Games
PC Invasion
Attack of the Fanboy
Touch, Tap, Play
Pro Game Guides
Gamer Journalist
Operation Sports
GameSkinny
- Leigh ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) English71•1 year ago
This is fucking gross. There’s no one who thinks people will read the mass shit they pump out.
- AineLasagna ( @AineLasagna@beehaw.org ) English63•1 year ago
A lot of sites like these are already just click farms with “articles” consisting of a headline and a couple poorly-researched sentences. Switching to AI probably won’t significantly change the quality of what they’re churning out.
- Leigh ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) English25•1 year ago
Right. That’s why searching for anything on the internet SUCKS these days. The results are all just filler bullshit.
- Nullroad ( @Nullroad@beehaw.org ) English18•1 year ago
Something to keep in mind is that these companies aren’t concerned with total profit or revenue or anything like that - it’s all about the percentage. I suspect in the short term, these AI-articles will look very profitable. Networking effects, consumer habits, and SEO will carry the day for a time.
But what always screws these MBA types is the inability to recognize the specific natures of their business and the second order effects. Not all costs are representable on a spread-sheet.
Basically, the second order to me really boils down to this: AI generated content isn’t really a ‘brand’. Good writing shops tend to build a following with their writers and expectations with their editors. The writing, investigative, and editorial bent of a house is essentially what makes a shop. See The Economist and The New Yorker as examples. In other places, a lot of niche shops are selling personality as much as product with youtube, podcasts, and others.
this means there is no real ‘value add’ someone like an AI shop can provide. You are throwing yourselves down the hole of becoming a pure commodity, and as every business major knows, being a commodity sucks. Short term profitable, but literally no one cares about where a mass produced nail comes from and its a race to the bottom of price.
So, as time goes on, with the barrier for entry being incredibly low, every bill and joe who fancies themselves an SEO wizard has no reason to not jump in, so your competition rises and your ability to charge some value for (ads?) drops a lot. But that’s the tip of the iceberg. Many of the companies that would occupy this brandless, commodity-filling space are way better positioned to make a run at it than the GAMURS Groups of the world. Microsoft’s Bing chat and (probably soon to follow Bard) will whip your ass in the long-game. Why search Bing to get an AI article from the Escapist when Bing will do it for me? I really doubt anything churned out by an AI with some edits will be that much better per convenience.
This whole could easily collapse in on itself. Like a lot of people in the AI space, I’m interested to watch what happens when AI begins to consume and be built on its own content.
- Leigh ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
Basically, the second order to me really boils down to this: AI generated content isn’t really a ‘brand’. Good writing shops tend to build a following with their writers and expectations with their editors. The writing, investigative, and editorial bent of a house is essentially what makes a shop. See The Economist and The New Yorker as examples. In other places, a lot of niche shops are selling personality as much as product with youtube, podcasts, and others.
Yep. This is why I’ve been a paying subscriber to Ars Technica for over a decade. You’re exactly correct. Ditto with NPR.
- Cylinsier ( @Cylinsier@beehaw.org ) English51•1 year ago
The enshitification of the internet continues. How can we offer our content, but without having to pay anyone for it and at a much higher rate of delivery? By not giving a fuck about the quality anymore and not having any real competition so people have no choice. Except people always have a choice. We can walk away.
- Pegatron ( @Pegatron@kbin.social ) 26•1 year ago
I don’t see why people would even go to a site to read AI generated articles and be bombarded with ads. I could just ask an AI to write an article for me? Just cut out the middle man at that point.
- interolivary ( @interolivary@beehaw.org ) 13•1 year ago
I don’t see why people would even go to a site to read AI generated articles and be bombarded with ads.
Doesn’t have to be voluntary on the user’s part. Maybe they clicked a link on Google? Or maybe a site they’ve been reading for ages suddenly switches to “AI editors” and it’s never really announced to the users in a clear way
- greenskye ( @greenskye@beehaw.org ) 8•1 year ago
Yep. Someone will make an app to generate click bait for you on the fly.
- Jimmycrackcrack ( @Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml ) 4•1 year ago
The sites don’t mention the AI authorship, so you go there to read an article, likely one you found linked elsewhere, only to be baffled by the ramblings.
- JZshark ( @JZshark@beehaw.org ) English45•1 year ago
Considering how many blogs are just AI generated garbage now, it doesn’t surprise me that the big players are looking to automate their articles.
The issue is that AI can’t really create… it just remakes what it already knows and has seen before. No hot takes. No new ideas. Just whatever has been done before.
Hopefully this isn’t the new way everything goes…
Also, Chat GPT at least still writes at the level of a somewhat talented ninth grader. Its prose is stilted, and the way it structures essays and stories is super formulaic.
It’s absolutely not at the level it can replace a talented human writer yet. (I have no doubt that day is coming, probably sooner than we think, but it’s not here yet.)
So publishers making the switch will see the quality of their content drop, and with it the number of clicks / revenue they get. Enough to offset the salaries of all the writers they fired? Probably depends on the publication. For clickbait farms, probably not, but the higher quality the readers are used to the more the publishers stand to lose.
- megahbite ( @megahbite@dataterm.digital ) English10•1 year ago
It doesn’t commit to anything either, its writing is absolutely full of weasel words and a detached perspective.
- toadmode ( @toadmode@beehaw.org ) 4•1 year ago
doesn’t the average american read at a 6th grade level or something?
- phi1997 ( @phi1997@kbin.social ) 7•1 year ago
Writing is harder than reading. For example, compare the writing in a children’s book to something written by a child
- DrWeevilJammer ( @DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml ) 3•1 year ago
54% (130 million) Americans read BELOW the equivalent of a 6th grade level.
A lot of the reason for this is chronic underfunding of K-12 ESL programs in southern states and California.
- psudo ( @psudo@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
I mean, I feel like a mildly talented 9th grader is around as good as my writing ever got, so I think it’s understandable that’s about as good as you’re likely to see for awhile from AI generated text.
- ArugulaZ ( @ArugulaZ@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
I’ve been to Destructoid. They don’t hire talented human writers. They barely hire human writers.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English1•1 year ago
Sure, but it’s easy for a human to come up with semi-original prompts and then the content is good enough for some random magazine…
- adderaline ( @ondoyant@beehaw.org ) English40•1 year ago
I’m just waiting until these models get completely unraveled by training on output. The more people use generative AI to make stuff online, the more useless the internet is as a data source.
- SteelCorrelation ( @SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one ) English30•1 year ago
So now I know which sites to ignore completely from now on.
- rockprada ( @rockprada@midwest.social ) English22•1 year ago
Probably wouldn’t hurt to blacklist links from sites known to produce only AI generated articles.
- Pigeon ( @Lowbird@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
I want a ublock origin list for this.
- SteelCorrelation ( @SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one ) English6•1 year ago
Amen. I’ve already removed the ones listed above from my RSS reader (that I had subscribed to).
- average650 ( @average650@beehaw.org ) English4•1 year ago
I’m pretty sure I’m already ignoring all these sites.
- Plume (She/Her) ( @Plume@beehaw.org ) English28•1 year ago
Destructoid; The Escapist; Siliconera; Twinfinite; Dot Esports; Upcomer; Gamepur; Prima Games; PC Invasion; Attack of the Fanboy; Touch, Tap, Play; Pro Game Guides; Gamer Journalist; Operation Sports and GameSkinny.
Noted. I’m officially starting a “not reading your crap” list.
- Floppy ( @Floppy@beehaw.org ) English7•1 year ago
Yep, time to just blackhole their DNS entries.
- Sentinian ( @Sentinian@lemmy.one ) English4•1 year ago
Gotta say, all those sites sound like ai generated titles already
- Pigeon ( @Lowbird@beehaw.org ) English2•1 year ago
Cnet, too. They crapped out some misinformation ridden ai generated articles a while ago.
- EremesZorn ( @EremesZorn@beehaw.org ) English25•1 year ago
Yo, I don’t mean to get all John Connor or anything, but we need to put a stop to and legislate against AI. Full stop.
We already see how it’s being misused.- bartera ( @bartera@beehaw.org ) English19•1 year ago
What would you legislate here? The publication clearly doesn’t care about quality and paying some people to fill shitty, already pre programmed templates and using something like chatGPT seems like the same style of crap.
They were definitely not a safe source of labor.
Also, I’d caution against reactive takes of “legislation” when the politicians who can legislate usually don’t understand the technologies and are simply trying to bundle stuff in for their lobbyist (who funds them) benefit. The same types who “want to ban encryption” or other myopic takes.
Stronger rights and guarantees around imbalances of power (not specifically related to tech either) would work much better than just reacting to an AI scare.
- erwan ( @erwan@lemmy.ml ) English1•1 year ago
Having to put a disclaimer if an article is written using AI (like they have to do for advertorial) would be a good step.
- yarr ( @yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) English2•1 year ago
I keep seeing this but I don’t get it. Can you give me the outline of a proposed law that you would enact?
- landsharkkidd ( @landsharkkidd@aussie.zone ) English24•1 year ago
I know game journalists are memed on, but this is really disappointing. AI will eventually unravel and crap out because it’s regurgitating AI content.
- greenskye ( @greenskye@beehaw.org ) English17•1 year ago
Will it eventually be AIs at the marketing firm telling the execs that their ads are successful because the AIs on the other side are ‘reading’ it for new training data on how to better optimize viewer attention span? Just two Ad companies paying each other back and forth?
- alternative_factor ( @alternative_factor@kbin.social ) 14•1 year ago
I can’t wait until The Escapist articles are all “Zelda Zelda Zelda Zelda ZeldaZeldaZeldaZeldaZeldaZeldaZelda Zelda Zelda Zelda Zelda Zelda”
- Deestan ( @Deestan@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
I’m least worried about The Escapist, as the editor-in-chief for the past few years Nick Caldera is running it with integrity. It is the only game news site I am happy to pay a subscription to.
- Daydreamy ( @Daydreamy@beehaw.org ) 7•1 year ago
How does that matter if the owners just fired all the writers and replaced them with an AI? I see little to no integrity at a publication owned by some big group calling shots like this. These are Nick’s bosses, so uhhh… he either listens or quits.
- Deestan ( @Deestan@beehaw.org ) 1•1 year ago
Yeah if they run it that brutally, it’s going to go bad.
But usually there is a lot of difference between how sub-companies are treated both based on how they are currently doing and how strong-headed their management is.
- peanuts4life ( @peanuts4life@beehaw.org ) English23•1 year ago
Any service looking to replace human writers with ai is positioning itself for failure once generative ai becomes more mainstream. Once your average Joe can ask a native phone app for anything they want, the Only value of written text will be the human element.
- sydneybrokeit ( @sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org ) English5•1 year ago
This is actually an incredibly good point. This applies to writing, visual arts, music, programming…
- TooLikeTheNope ( @TooLikeTheNope@beehaw.org ) English22•1 year ago
… until someone will use an AI to generate a whole publication… or a whole set of them… or an entire publisher… or an entire holding owning the publisher…
I’ve just seen Black Mirror S06E01 yesterday night and it did hit deep
- ____ ( @____@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
I had no idea Black Mirror was back, thank you for this comment. Now I just have to find the time to watch it :P
- JakeBacon ( @JakeBacon@lemm.ee ) English20•1 year ago
I wonder if this will end as poorly as that eating disorder hotline that did the same thing.
- Stormyfemme ( @Stormyfemme@beehaw.org ) English19•1 year ago
At least this is less likely to hurt or kill people.
- Killakomodo ( @Killakomodo@kbin.social ) 10•1 year ago
that eating disorder hotline that did the same thing.
Excuse me… what???
- SoupOfTheDay ( @SoupOfTheDay@kbin.social ) 11•1 year ago
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/eating-disorder-helpline-chatbot-disabled/
It’s already been reversed because of how badly it did.
- CynAq ( @CynAq@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
They didn’t reverse it in the sense that they went back to human operators. They got rid of the AI by getting rid of the service altogether by the looks of things.
- SoupOfTheDay ( @SoupOfTheDay@kbin.social ) 7•1 year ago
Sometimes no service is better than bad service?
- Pigeon ( @Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
In this case, yes.
- Roland ( @dinodrinkstea@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year ago
And of course they fired the workers after they voted to unionize, what else we would expect?
- eight_of_tentacles ( @eight_of_tentacles@mander.xyz ) English17•1 year ago
One person to edit 250 AI articles per week? I’d be very surprised if they found them.
- deegeese ( @deegeese@sopuli.xyz ) English15•1 year ago
“Editor”
Read 50 short articles each day and approve any that aren’t blatantly offensive.
- Swallowtail ( @Swallowtail@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
Just use another AI to edit the first AI’s articles!
- DrWeevilJammer ( @DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml ) English4•1 year ago
It’s AI all the way down!
- Den_The_Grem ( @Den_The_Grem@beehaw.org ) English17•1 year ago
This may be a little tangential, but does anyone know of any game news sites with RSS feeds that have talented writers working for them? Some of the sites I’ve followed for years have been regurgitating Twitter opinions more and more, and it makes finding thoughtful (or just plain informative) articles far more difficult.
- sky ( @sky@beehaw.org ) English11•1 year ago
If you like MMOs and other multiplayer games, https://massivelyop.com/ is very good. Talented writers funded by reader donations.
- Den_The_Grem ( @Den_The_Grem@beehaw.org ) English3•1 year ago
I’ve been following that publication for a while, actually, and I agree. They’re a great team.
- LordWarfire ( @PCurd@feddit.uk ) English8•1 year ago
I’ve used RockPaperShotgun for a long time https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/
- addie ( @addie@feddit.uk ) English3•1 year ago
Aye, long term subscriber myself, they do good work. Although I’d have probably linked the ‘everything, newest first’ page:
- Grimace ( @Grimace@beehaw.org ) English14•1 year ago
I just don’t see ChatGPT being capable enough quite yet. These articles are going to be low quality, written in the same voice, and filled with factual errors. Not to mention released at a volume that nobody will bother to keep up with. Seems like self destruction on their part.
- parrot-party ( @parrot-party@kbin.social ) 8•1 year ago
An AI writer is always going to be trash. AI can’t experience anything, only remix preexisting content. So it’ll always be a regurgitation of what others have posted. But if we keep cutting out humans, then it’ll eventually be nothing content on repeat.
- Kaldo ( @Kaldo@kbin.social ) 7•1 year ago
There is also always a chance that it’s simply going to be wrong, ML cannot differentiate what is the truth or not. We see it happen with easy mistakes that people wouldn’t make and it’s going to be even worse when they get used for something more nuanced or complex.
- Wiredfire ( @Wiredfire@kayb.ee ) 7•1 year ago
Of course it’ll be trash. Quality isn’t the goal, just bulk with the aim of getting maybe fewer views per article but pumping out so so many that it’s more views, or rather ad impressions, overall with much lower cost.
Problem is it’s shortsighted. Once those sources quickly get a reputation for trash quality folk will learn not to bother clicking through to those sources.
- SteleTrovilo ( @SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org ) English12•1 year ago
Destructoid was so good for so long. Between this and the fact that they started to bug me about my ad blocker, it’s time for me to stop giving them views.
- Jarmer ( @Jarmer@vlemmy.net ) English4•1 year ago
Really sad to see them fall so far. I remember back when they seemed like a beacon of light and hope of good communities and journalists etc. now to see them turn into just a spam garbage site is so sad.