Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
philz ( philz@beehaw.org )  to World News · 3 years ago

AP News: A search is underway for missing submarine that takes people to see Titanic

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
151
link
fedilink
217
external-link

AP News: A search is underway for missing submarine that takes people to see Titanic

apnews.com

philz ( philz@beehaw.org )  to World News · 3 years ago
message-square
151
link
fedilink
A search is underway for missing submarine that takes people to see Titanic
apnews.com
external-link
A search is underway for a missing submersible that carries people to view the wreckage of the Titanic. Canadian officials say the five-person submersible was reported overdue Sunday night about 435 miles (700 kilometers) south of St. John's, Newfoundland and that the search is being led by the U.S. Coast Guard. The owner of the ship that launched the submersible confirmed that it was operated by OceanGate Expeditions, which has been operating annual voyages since 2021 to the wreckage of the iconic ocean liner. In a statement, the company said it is working to bring the crew back safely.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 years ago

    CBS dude rode on it and did an interview with the owner.

    So many red flags.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29co_Hksk6o&feature=youtu.be

    • Onii-Chan ( Onii-Chan@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Built with shit from Home Depot, controlled with a literal Logitech game controller, construction pipes as ballast… holy fuck, why would anybody agree to go 3.7km below the surface of the ocean in that deathtrap?

      • mercurly ( mercurly@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        3 years ago

        Imagine paying $250k and the pilot pulls out the player 2 controller

        • SevenSwell ( SevenSwell@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 years ago

          Those Logitech controllers are actually pretty decent. I’ve had one for ages and it’s still going strong.

          • leftascenter ( leftascenter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

        • patchymoose ( patchymoose@rammy.site ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          Jesus, is that really what they’re using? 😳

        • Onii-Chan ( Onii-Chan@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          lmao for real. Couldn’t even fork out for a first party controller.

      • Chrisosaur ( Chrisosaur@startrek.website ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 years ago

        Hope the pilot tried ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️⬅️➡️🅱️🅰️ start

      • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        Made out of a fiberglass tube (catastrophic failure) and titanium end caps (cracks) instead of steel.

        “Steel is real.”

        • Pigeon ( Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          Titanium cracks under pressure, I take it?

          Or is the join between the cap and the fiberglass body potentially more of a problem?

          • rustyspoon ( rustyspoon@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Everything cracks under pressure, I’m not exactly sure what the above commenter is getting at. If the sub was steel the walls would be thinner. With titanium the walls would be thicker. Without knowing the dimensions of the material we can’t know whether it was built to high enough standards.

          • ZapBeebz ( ZapBeebz@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 years ago

            I mean, anything will crack under pressure. The biggest issue I see is uneven compression of the two materials coupled with different fatigue behaviors. I’d feel a lot safer if the whole submarine was titanium, honestly. Barring that, a couple inches of solid steel would be just as comforting.

          • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 years ago

            I would be worried about both. Joining two very different materials that need to deal with crazy pressures seems like a really bad idea.

            • leftascenter ( leftascenter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Good point!

            • PoopSnatchXtreme ( BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.one ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              bUt iT wAs dEsIgNeD wItH NASA iNpUt

          • Uniquitous ( Uniquitous@lemmy.one ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            As I understand it, titanium is strong but brittle. It won’t bend, but it will break.

    • demvoter ( demvoter@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 years ago

      Wow, that is super sketchy. Now I am not at all surprised this happened. Hope that company has a shit ton of insurance.

      • TheFroggy ( xxxfroggyxxx@lemmynsfw.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 years ago

        Also, I’ve seen so many Scientific deepwater vehicles that are thethered to the ship in some form. Why isn’t this thing hooked up to a cran yhat can get it back up if someone fails? I’d think passenger vessels should pass more rigurous safety standards than that.

        Are they liable btw or is the “international waters” situation doing them any favor?

        • CarbonIceDragon ( CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 years ago

          I seem to recall a point in that CBS video where they had to sign a waiver stating among other things that they acknowledged it was an experimental vessel that is not certified by or approved any regulatory agency, so, yeah. I don’t know that I’d count on there being rigorous safely standards in that case

      • ReallyKinda ( ReallyKinda@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        There was a conspiracy that the original titanic going down was an insurance scam.

        • NattyNatty2x4 ( NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 years ago

          There’s also a conspiracy that my farts smell like rancid carrots because the government puts carrots up my butt while I’m sleeping

          • AnarchoYeasty ( AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org ) Banned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 years ago

            Why aren’t more people talking about big carrot? Wake up sheeple

          • Uniquitous ( Uniquitous@lemmy.one ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Absolutely ridiculous. It’s huge international mega-corporations doing that.

        • mobyduck648 ( mobyduck648@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 years ago

          An easily disproved one too, as the sister ships weren’t actually identical. Also the recent scan on the ship revealed the hull number 401 on one of the propellers putting another nail in the coffin of the idea the ship is actually the Olympic.

          • BlueDiamond ( BlueDiamond@rammy.site ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 years ago

            Oh i hate that stupid theory. That’s like top tier “looking for a conspiracy because we’ve got nothing better to do”

        • FaceDeer ( FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 years ago

          They’re playing a really long game if so. Submarines like this weren’t even conceived of yet when the Titanic went down, it’d take tremendous foresight to have set this up.

        • Storksforlegs ( storksforlegs@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          It’s not a great theory. I’m pretty sure it would have made more money transporting passengers hundreds of times over

  • BobQuasit ( BobQuasit@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 years ago

    I find it strangely hard to care about the fate of a handful of multimillionaire tourists when hundreds of refugees died last week due to the indifference of the Greek authorities - and the media barely noticed.

    • SSH_2023 ( SSH_2023@startrek.website ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Exactly- this is only news because their rich.

      • CeruleanRuin ( CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        I am, however, enjoying the gradual turn from the search and rescue efforts to assigning blame and pointing out all the noted issues with the vessel that went missing - and the pushback from people saying it was completely safe.

        History repeats itself.

    • CeruleanRuin ( CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      We should all just be glad that James Cameron wasn’t on board. Imagine never getting another one of his movies because he Heart -of-the-Ocean’ed himself.

  • Drew Got No Clue ( ndr@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 years ago

    That’s sort of… poetic in a messed up way.

    • FaceDeer ( FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Only if the sub remains undiscovered for ~70 years.

    • mercurly ( mercurly@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Why did they name it Titan??

  • TheOtherJake ( TheOtherJake@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 years ago

    …officials are working to get a remotely operated vehicle that can reach a depth of 6,000 meters (about 20,000 feet) to the site as soon as possible.

    The 5-person submersible, named Titan, is capable of diving 4,000 meters or 13,120 ft. “with a comfortable safety margin,” OceanGate said in its filing with the court.

    but…after looking up on Wikipedia

    …a wreck that lies over 12,000 feet (3,700 m) below the surface…

    • neuropean ( neuropean@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 years ago

      I think they’re advertising the depth limit of the recovery vehicle, not claiming that the wreck is actually at 20,000 feet.

      • TheOtherJake ( TheOtherJake@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        They probably need quite a bit of margin too if the craft accidentally got lost in a deeper area

    • Pigeon ( Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      It might be best practice to use a vessel rated for considerably deeper than you actually go, in case of some problem in the hull?

      • Pigeon ( Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 years ago

        And/or it’s just a description of a particular vehicle they’re bringing that was most convenient to get there quickly.

        • Projectionist ( Projectionist@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s not like they’re going to say, “oh, don’t bring THAT recovery vehicle, it can go TOO deep.”

    • FaceDeer ( FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe they’re concerned that it no-clipped through the sea bottom and wound up deeper than the Titanic’s current location?

  • Great Meh ( great_meh@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 years ago

    What I dont get is that one of the passengers was a billionaire. He could have built himself the fanciest and safest vessel for a few Million Dollars with a whole naval operation attached. Of course thats a lot more than 250K but still nothing for a billionaire. These people are so out of touch and cheap its insane.

    • TheTrueLinuxDev ( TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      It goes to prove that billionaires are just as gullible as the rest of the people, all they had was just money and assets, it doesn’t grant them wisdom or intelligence.

      • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 years ago

        That much money must give you incredible hubris: up until this point you’ve never had a problem that money couldn’t fix (or ease) for you.

        Unfortunately, you can’t bribe physics.

        • the_itsb (she/her) ( the_itsb@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          I’ve never thought about it this way before. You’ve given me empathy for billionaires; thanks, I hate it!

    • interolivary ( interolivary@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Goes to further prove that it doesn’t take brains to become a billionaire, I guess

    • not_amm ( not_amm@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Why do that when you can cut costs, and how would it be possible for them not to ensure their safety? I don’t think they cut costs like the clients, I don’t think they would put lites at risk just for the sake of some extra dollars to the pocket of the CEO. /s

  • TheLoneMinon ( TheLoneMinon@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    This shits going to keep happening as companies continue to rush commercialization of “Extreme” Travel.

    • Uniquitous ( Uniquitous@lemmy.one ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m ok with sending a bunch of billionaires to the bottom of the ocean.

  • Holos620 ( Holos620@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
      shield
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 years ago

      this is a very weird first comment to make and the subsequent comments neither look productive nor particularly on topic. let’s save the thirsting for rich people blood for a topic where it’s more warranted folks, please and thanks.

      • hglman ( hglman@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        But rich blood being spilled is the topic. They took a huge risk only to get more resources deployed to find them.

    • Kitten ( Kitten@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 years ago

      Removed by mod

    • Pigeon ( Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Removed by mod

      • ddh ( DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

      • RedMarsRepublic ( RedMarsRepublic@vlemmy.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Removed by mod

    • FaceDeer ( FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Removed by mod

      • CarolinaBlues ( CarolinaBlues@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        The best new eco funeral option is human composting, let’s hope they had advance directives to support that industry as well!

        • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          “Ask a Mortician” did a video on what happened to the bodies from the Titanic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHwXhUFQPCk

          • PoopSnatchXtreme ( BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.one ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            She also did a video on human composting. https://youtu.be/_LJSEZ_pl3Y

      • RedMarsRepublic ( RedMarsRepublic@vlemmy.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Removed by mod

    • CarbonIceDragon ( CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Regardless of one’s opinion the super rich, the thing also has crew that are just there because they’re paid to operate the thing, I doubt they make enough to buy tickets for this kind of thing themselves.

    • MadCybertist ( MadCybertist@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Removed by mod

    • lolpostslol ( lolpostslol@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Removed by mod

  • jherazob ( jherazob@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 years ago

    Here’s a thread giving info on all the shoddiness of that sub

    • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      https://newrepublic.com/post/173802/missing-titanic-sub-faced-lawsuit-depths-safely-travel-oceangate

      This adds to the picture of utter recklessness.

      At the meeting Lochridge discovered why he had been denied access to the viewport information from the Engineering department—the viewport at the forward of the submersible was only built to a certified pressure of 1,300 meters, although OceanGate intended to take passengers down to depths of 4,000 meters. Lochridge learned that the viewport manufacturer would only certify to a depth of 1,300 meters due to experimental design of the viewport supplied by OceanGate, which was out of the Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy (“PVHO”) standards. OceanGate refused to pay for the manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required depth of 4,000 meters.

      • pelotron ( pelotron@midwest.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        So they wanted to die. Got it.

      • ZapBeebz ( ZapBeebz@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        What the actual fuck. They built a literal deathtrap

      • Storksforlegs ( storksforlegs@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

      • CeruleanRuin ( CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        They said it was unsinkable!

  • Dane ( TheLastOfHisName@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 years ago

    Even if I had a stupid amount of money, there’s no way in hell I would pay someone to stuff me inside what seems to be an over-sized propane tank, then send me to depths where the water pressure is so extreme it will literally crush you.

    Just…no.

    • Kleinbonum ( Kleinbonum@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      I particularly like the part where this specific submersible can’t ever be opened from the inside, because it gets bolted shut from outside.

      • PoopSnatchXtreme ( BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        You wouldn’t want to open it down there, but also I don’t know why anyone would want to be down there in the first place.

        • itsYaBoyNoodles ( r3nder@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 years ago

          You definitely wouldn’t. But what about if you made it to the surface in an emergency? I’d probably want to open it at that point. Someone mentioned how the sub reminds them of Apollo 1 and I tend to agree. So many poor choices were made!

  • SaintLunatic ( SaintLunatic@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    According to the article there is a metal eating bacteria that’s eating the titanic? And it the wreckage might be gone in a few decades?

    That’s incredible

    • Pumpki ( Pumpki@toast.ooo ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      Now they probably have a new submersible to munch on…

      • x86x87 ( x86x87@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        Predinner snack!

  • intrnt ( intrnt@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    It has 96 hours of life support, I have faith.

    • ZapBeebz ( ZapBeebz@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 years ago

      I am hopeful, but not necessarily optimistic…if it lost power and descended below crush depth, no amount of life support is bringing them back.

      • Pigeon ( Lowbird@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        Someone else in the other thread about this said they have magnetically attached ballasts that can be jettisoned so the sub floats if power is lost.

        It’s also designed to go down to the floor where the Titanic is. Was it also passing over deeper water? I’dve assumed they’d release it from a boat above the titantic fairly directly.

        • TinyWhaleInSpace ( TinyWhaleInSpace@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          But apparently they cannot open the hatch from the inside, so even if they are on the surface, the oxygen will still run out if they’re not found.

          Edit: here’s an article about this: https://www.insider.com/people-missing-submersible-deadbolt-screws-airtight-coast-guard-2023-6

          I assume there is also no vent or similar to let air in?

        • ZapBeebz ( ZapBeebz@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 years ago

          Well with all that taken into account, the fact that we haven’t seen any evidence of the sub yet is a very bad sign.

    • Tin ( Tin@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      This may be true, but how much time does it take to surface to avoid decompression sickness if they are found? This, of course, assumes that the surface in the same vehicle.

      • mobyduck648 ( mobyduck648@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        The inhabitants of the submarine aren’t under pressure directly like scuba divers are, they’re at atmospheric pressure while inside which is why the pressure hull needs to be so strong to resist the hundreds of PSI outside - it’s the pressure difference that crushes things in this case. If they are rescued there’ll be no requirement to decompress slowly as their bodies were never under pressure and at risk of the bends (when nitrogen bubbles form in your blood with often lethal results) to begin with.

        The inhabitants of the Kursk during that submarine disaster were subjected to high pressure in their last hours but that was because the water slowly flooding their compartment compressed the air like a piston, this isn’t a concern for this submarine as it goes far deeper than the Kursk and the slightest fracture to the hull would kill them instantly in a violent implosion.

  • Sooperstition ( Sooperstition@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    Who even has the vessels that can go deep enough to rescue them? This is the stuff of nightmares

    • kingofmadcows ( kingofmadcows@startrek.website ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 years ago

      Gabe Newell, yes the owner of Valve/Steam, has an ocean research organization that owns a submarine designed to dive down to 10km, to some of the deepest parts of the ocean.

    • CarbonIceDragon ( CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 years ago

      To be fair, even if no vehicle that could rescue it from the bottom is available, that doesn’t mean that there is no use in a rescue mission if they don’t know where the sub is. For instance, it could have surfaced but had it’s communications lost, in which case they’d still need rescue, because based on a CBS video of the sub in question shared elsewhere on the thread, the thing doesn’t actually have a hatch and just has the front taken off and then bolted back on afterwards to let people in and out, and obviously is going to be airtight given it’s a sub and all.

  • khalic ( khalic@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    I hope there’s some kind of black box… what would be worse than it happenning again one day because we don’t know what happenned.

    • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      BBC said that this sub (Titan) was damaged last year, and this was its first dive since being “repaired.”

      I’m betting it didn’t have a black box, and we’ll never know if the “repair” was the cause.

      • khalic ( khalic@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        Why do you put a 19yo in an untested death trap like this…

        • StringTheory ( StringTheory@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 years ago

          That is the worst part to me. This kid’s main interests were Rubik’s cubes and volleyball. At least all these old guys had an interest in the Titanic and knew what they were getting into.

          I feel bad for the kid.

    • ZapBeebz ( ZapBeebz@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s controlled with a knockoff Xbox controller. I’ll bet the “black box” is a cassette recorder bought from Goodwill for $3 and then spray painted black

  • samrocksc ( samrocksc@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    I feel bad for the families of folks

  • SSH_2023 ( SSH_2023@startrek.website ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    They are meant to run out of oxygen 11am BST on 22/6/2023

World News

news

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@beehaw.org

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3 users / day
  • 169 users / week
  • 335 users / month
  • 1.24K users / 6 months
  • 3.75K local subscribers
  • 24.9K subscribers
  • 4.65K Posts
  • 22.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • Gaywallet (they/it) ( Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
  • LDRMS ( LDRMS@beehaw.org ) 
  • sophs [she/her] ( s0phia@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code