You must log in or register to comment.
- I_am_10_squirrels ( @I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org ) English6•1 year ago
Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn’t include judicial.
- !ozoned@lemmy.world ( @ozoned@beehaw.org ) English6•1 year ago
Don’t worry it has 0 chance of passing.
- SkepticElliptic ( @SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org ) English8•1 year ago
It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling.
It’s also a way for them to finger point during election season.
- !ozoned@lemmy.world ( @ozoned@beehaw.org ) English4•1 year ago
Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
- Idrunkenlysignedup ( @Idrunkenlysignedup@beehaw.org ) English2•1 year ago
“They aren’t my stocks, they’re my wife’s/husband’s/daughter’s/son’s” - every politician
- SkepticElliptic ( @SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org ) English4•1 year ago
“my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn’t affect the trades he makes”
- TheTrueLinuxDev ( @TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org ) English3•1 year ago
Something like this requires a constitution amendment…