looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don’t run a complaint browser ( cough…firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i’m sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

  •  mr_right   ( @mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    –>since everyone is confused about this i’m gonna try to explain as best as i could and also clearing some misconceptions:

    1# why this is such a big deal ?

    if this gets implemented AND it gets widely adopted websites now can refuse to give you content if you are running a non complied browser, remember those website that say “oh you are using an ad blocker so disable it to access our site” they can detect this by various methods but ultimately all of them rely on running a JavaScript into your browser. which you guessed it, its easy to modify and tamper with manually or using extensions

    now what WEI-API does is that it can verify the integrity of the web page ( JavaScript/HTML/CSS has not been modified ) and even tell the website what extensions - ad blocker detected no content for you - you are using and what browser you are using - firefox or brave detected no content for you - and do not be fooled into thinking that this can be spoofed. and website owners who think that they are running a business not a charity will implement this.

    2#will using firefox save me?

    if this gets widely adopted and you inevitably encounter a website that require this ( for your job ,school or your bank ) you have no choice but to use chrome just like when your banking apps refuse to work because your phone is rooted which means that SAFETY-NET is broken

    3#why this is a threat to begin with?

    this is only viable if the web adopt it so why bother?, well guess what google is famous for making its services very easy to integrate and well documented just look on how easy it is to integrate google analytics and google adsense* into websites and how many of them use it in the internet.

    4#what can we do to prevent this?

    this is my personal opinion but i think we simply can’t, this not like the reddit incident were very large portion of the user base was upset most people don’t know/care/give-a-fuck about web technologies and how they work.

    #and Finally “but google said they don’t plan to use this to fingerprint you (Device ID) or track your browser history or interfere with the work of extensions”

    do you really believe that a company like google whose bread and butter is advertising would not make it easier for themselves, a company who has been exposed time and time again for lying and having ulterior motives ( you don’t need to look far just look into what manifest-v3 did )

    •  GnuLinuxDude   ( @GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      remember those website that say “oh you are using an ad blocker so disable it to access our site”

      I can easily imagine this not being a necessary, anymore. Just let the website using this WEI API automatically disable all browser extensions on a WEI-enabled site. Why not, after all? Why should you dictate the traffic you receive on your computer? Why should you own anything?

  • Stop using Google products I don’t know how else to fucking say it.

    Chrome -> Firefox Drive -> sync or Dropbox or any number of options Sheets and productivity tools > libre office or Apache open office YouTube -> Invidious or even better, odysse Google search -> duck duck go, SearXNG, StartPage, etc Gmail -> not a ton of great options. I’d probably recommend proton mail but the FOSS email world is definitely lacking, or gets blocked or goes down, harder to self host etc.

    •  kszeslaw   ( @kszeslaw@szmer.info ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, sure, it’s always the same story:

      1. Chrome adds a shitty anti-user “feature”
      2. Firefox users say “no come to firefox we don’t have that!”
      3. 3 months pass
      4. Firefox adds the same “feature” because it’s the standard now!!

      I’m a Firefox user myself but I really hope something new comes along that actually cares about its users

      •  Zetaphor   ( @Zetaphor@zemmy.cc ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re saying this like Firefox is adding the shitty standard because they want to, and not because Google used their monopoly to force adoption of the shitty standard forcing Firefox to follow suit if they don’t want their users to have a broken experience.

        If Google introduces a shitty standard to YouTube and Firefox doesn’t adopt it, do you honestly think users are going to care or understand and blame Google? No, they’ll get pissed because they think Firefox broke YouTube and they’ll move to Chrome.

        This exact situation played out with shadow DOM, Google implemented it into YouTube while it was still a draft standard, so all non-Chrome browsers ran worse because they had to use a polyfill.

        That is why we’re telling people to stop using Chromium. If they didn’t have this monopoly none of this would be possible. Mozilla has some issues as an organization, but do honestly you think the better choice is letting an advertising company decide how the web works?

      •  Engywook   ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You can’t legally donate to Firefox, as it is developed by a Corp (Mozilla Corp.).

        Donations go to Mozilla Foundation, which does… other things with you money (advocacy and, frankly speaking, a lot of unrelated crap) In other words, your money don’t go towards FF development, so you may want to think twice before donating.

      •  boonhet   ( @boonhet@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The sad part is Mozilla is more of a political organization than just the developers of Firefox now. So you’re donating for their lobbying, not just browser development.

        Firefox needs new ownership. But it’s kinda hard considering how big of a project a browser is nowadays.

        •  Engywook   ( @Engywuck@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          not just browser development

          Not even a single dime can go towards FF development, as it is done by a Corporation (Mozilla Corp.) which can’t legally take donations.

  •  HurlingDurling   ( @HurlingDurling@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 years ago

    Users like visiting websites that are expensive to create and maintain, but they often want or need to do it without paying directly. These websites fund themselves with ads, but the advertisers can only afford to pay for humans to see the ads, rather than robots.

    Won’t you think of the poor poor ad companies?

    •  buckykat   ( @buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Users like visiting websites that are expensive to create and maintain

      Do they actually, or is that just all they have to visit anymore? Would users not be happier visiting a bunch of cheap geocities pages with blink tags instead of tracking cookies?

    •  Blackmist   ( @Blackmist@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Half the internet now seems to be bots creating content purely for the enjoyment of other bots. Typing any kind of difficult question into a search engine will now have you dodging a minefield of AI generated articles, none of which contain any useful information other than what they’ve scraped from other AI generated pages.

  •  person   ( @person@fenbushi.site ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    I see so many comments from people saying they’ll jump ship if Google adds this to Chrome. They’ll move over to Firefox right away. But the thing most people don’t know is one reason Google has such a broad reach is they make it so crazy easy to integrate their services for developers.

    So, yes, users who dislike what they’re doing should stop using Google products if possible. But, more importantly, developers or project managers, etc. should all resist the urge to utilize this kind of feature even if it’s easy.

      •  Teon   ( @Teon@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I completely agree.
        Would you like to follow me on G+ ?
        Google & Microsoft are famous for copying what all the other companies are doing and then letting it all die.
        Hello from Zune land.

      •  Poke   ( @poke@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        This kind of feature is likely to be cloud agnostic, so Gcloud vs AWS isn’t really what’s up for debate.

        They’re likely referencing the ease of adding something like google analytics to a website, where you include a url in the code for a page and you’re done.

      •  person   ( @person@fenbushi.site ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean Google has very convenient libraries that developers can add to their apps/websites like libraries for ads, A/B testing, crash reporting, push notifications, etc. Even using one’s Google account for SSO in an app just leaks a tiny bit of data for Google to suck up. I think the average phone user is unaware of how even non-Google apps can have Google code, even for iOS. Obviously, this is worse for Android since Google Play Services is installed on almost all Android devices.

  •  TerkErJerbs   ( @TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    I work at a vpn/adblocker company and we just finished releasing an updated mv3 extension that does block ads effectively (among other things) but the feature set is limited vs mv2 because of the changes. Furthermore, google has actually pushed back their mandated release schedule for mv3 compliance because something less than 30% of the extensions on their store are anywhere close to ready for it (which if they pushed ahead with mv3 they would effectively break 70% of what’s on there overnight).

    The DRM shit is just next-level bad though. Enshitification 101.

    • The thing is mv3 is not needed nor wanted by anyone, they are actively shoving an unnecessary product down our throats to show us more ads.

      I will keep on using Firefox and Librewolf until the web goes back to webpages that load in text only browsers in less than 2 secs

    • This would include YouTube, mail, drive, maps, search which I use daily. And it will be baked into android, and possibly Mac os so it supports the latest standard.

      My guess is that sooner or later google chrome will show scary warnings “this site does not support dem, here is a link why this is bad!!!” In the browsers address bar to get users and webmaster to adopt the DRM.

      •  eleitl   ( @eleitl@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        I rarely use Youtube, but this would help boost free/libre alternatives. I use Gmail web, which means Thunderbird-only or switching back to my own mailserver. Drive, there is Nextcloud. Maps, I mostly use Osmand. Search, I use ddg but here’s good point to use p2p and speciality search engines. Android, guess why I’m using Lineage OS. OS X, guess why I’m using Linux, or could switch to *BSD.

        Google can continue to devolve into a shittier version of a walled garden that is Apple.