circuitfarmer ( @circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org ) 87•11 months agoThis is going to happen for a while. Execs who actually have no clue have now been sold on the idea that AI lets them keep making money without paying labor.
It will fail eventually when the execs eventually take the time to learn what AI is capable of and what it isn’t capable of.
Who am I kidding? It’ll continue indefinitely because there are few consequences for clueless executives.
Kevin Herrera ( @kherge@beehaw.org ) 14•11 months agoWhat will probably happen is that people catch on that the content all reads alike and wonder why they shouldn’t just ask ChatGPT directly. Traffic to these sites die down, they panic, and start hiring writers.
worfamerryman ( @worfamerryman@beehaw.org ) 5•11 months agoI see a possibility where these sites eventually become terrible and there is a new person can come in and make content made by humans.
And009 ( @And009@reddthat.com ) 7•11 months agoEven edited by humans would be better than that
Cybersteel ( @Cybersteel@lemmy.ml ) 1•11 months agoNot even inpainting smh
waterplants ( @waterplants@lemm.ee ) 37•11 months agoPeople really don’t understand the current state of LLM, like the pictures generated “Its a really good picture of what a dog would look like, it’s not actually a dog”. Like a police sketch, with a touch of “randomeness” so you don’t always get the same picture.
I’m guessing they will try to solve this issue with some cheap human labour to review what is being generated. These verifers will probably not be experts on all the subjects that the llm will be spitting out, more of a “That does kind of look like a dog, APPROVED”.
Let’s say I’m wrong, and LLM’s can make as good of an article as any human. The content would be so saturated (even a tumblr user could now make as good and as much content as one of these companies), I would expect companies to be joining in on all the strikes 😆.
Funny world we are all going into.
Boas Entradas
Thorny_Thicket ( @Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz ) 6•11 months agoOne thing I disagree with is the assumption that anyone could create the same article by themselves. Coming up with a good prompt is a skill in itself and not everyone is equally good at it. I actually believe a prompt writer is going to be a new profession in the near future.
waterplants ( @waterplants@lemm.ee ) 2•11 months agoAre we assuming AI won’t be able to create a good prompt? 😂
VoxAdActa ( @VoxAdActa@beehaw.org ) 3•11 months agoI’m guessing they will try to solve this issue with some cheap human labour to review what is being generated.
They already do. These current "AI"s are starting to look more and more like Mechanical Turks, except with a couple hundred third-world wage-slaves inside the box.
heimchen ( @heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•11 months agoYea I think currently LLMs are in a stage to 2x or 1.5x the speed of a writer, but not really replace them.
DidacticDumbass ( @DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one ) 32•11 months agoBizarre. Not even keep a few editors for… the editing??
I wonder how this will affect the Stuff You Should Know podcsst.
mechinn ( @mechinn@kbin.social ) 9•11 months agoThey haven’t been associated for awhile, the company owning HowStuffWorks spun off the podcasting division in 2017 before selling it to iHeartMedia in 2018 https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/iheartmedia-stuff-media-howstuffworks-podcast-acquisition-1202939938/
DidacticDumbass ( @DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one ) 5•11 months agoOh, great to know!! They are my favorite duo, and I often here them talk about How Stuff Works articles.
Thank you for the link.
𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏 ( @lemann@lemmy.one ) English29•11 months agoSomeone should create a blocklist for all these new AI-driven websites.
For me personally thee primary appeal of websites are that there’s human authors behind the content… otherwise I’d just ask an ‘AI’ myself.
GiantBasil ( @GiantBasil@beehaw.org ) English13•11 months agoIt would be great to have a list of sites so id know whose links I can just immediately ignore.
worfamerryman ( @worfamerryman@beehaw.org ) 23•11 months agoHow long until we can a browser extension that lets us know when we are on a site written by AI?
I don’t mean AI detection, but instead, sites that announce they are laying off editors in favor of AI.
FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 3•11 months agoIf there was such a thing then sites wouldn’t announce they’re laying off editors in favor of AI.
worfamerryman ( @worfamerryman@beehaw.org ) 2•11 months agoIf there was such a thing, yet. I’m also not sure companies are announcing it for press, I think layoffs are news worthy and it gets reported on.
Yewb ( @Yewb@kbin.social ) 12•11 months agoCreating a market for real human content? Sounds tasty
Molehill8244 ( @Molehill8244@beehaw.org ) 4•11 months agoMaybe make it a co-op and put the CEO + AI article company out of business
I’m down for that
vrighter ( @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 11•11 months agoUsed to be one of my favourite sites when I was younger. Haven’t visited that site in ages. Holy crap, has it gone to complete shit. Like way worse than I thought possible
bazmatazable ( @bazmatazable@reddthat.com ) 1•11 months agoWhen I read the OP I thought “oh yeah I used to use that all the time, I wonder what its like now?”. Seems to have changed a lot…
vrighter ( @vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•11 months agototally unrecognizable. I can’t believe I actually used to learn stuff there
Infinity187 ( @Infinity187@lemm.ee ) 11•11 months agoI wonder how Josh and Chuck from SYSK feel about this.
jamyang ( @diemechanist@programming.dev ) 1•11 months agoWhat’s SYSK?
Infinity187 ( @Infinity187@lemm.ee ) 1•11 months agoStuff You Should Know! It’s a great podcast that’s affiliated with How Stuff Works, from my understanding.
Rejected666 ( @Rejected666@feddit.nl ) 1•11 months agoStuff You Should Know podcast.
WasPentalive ( @waspentalive@lemmy.one ) 7•11 months agoChatGPT comments on the news:
Prompt : In recent news, the management of “How it’s Made” has fired all the writers and editors on the show and intends to replace them with a large language model. What do you think?
ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I don’t have personal opinions or feelings, but I can provide an analysis based on the information available up to my last update in September 2021.
If the management of “How It’s Made” decides to fire all the writers and editors on the show and replace them with a large language model like me, there are both potential benefits and drawbacks to consider:
Benefits:
Cost Savings: Employing an AI language model could potentially reduce production costs as it eliminates the need for paying human writers and editors. Speed and Efficiency: AI models can generate content at a rapid pace, which may allow for more frequent episode releases or updates. Access to Data: AI models have access to vast amounts of data, which could result in more comprehensive and detailed explanations of the manufacturing processes. Consistency: AI-generated content can maintain a consistent style and tone throughout the episodes.
Drawbacks:
Lack of Creativity: While AI models can provide factual information, they might struggle to inject creative elements or engage with the audience on a more emotional level. Human Touch: Human writers and editors bring their unique perspectives and storytelling abilities to the show, which might be missed with an AI-only approach. Reliability: AI-generated content can sometimes produce errors or inaccurate information, which would require careful human oversight and fact-checking. Audience Response: The audience's perception of AI-generated content might not be as positive as content created by human professionals, leading to a potential decrease in viewership.
Ultimately, the success of this decision would depend on how well the AI language model can replicate the engaging and informative aspects that made “How It’s Made” popular in the first place. It’s important for the management to carefully evaluate the pros and cons and ensure a seamless transition if they decide to go down this route. Additionally, audience feedback and receptiveness to the AI-generated content will play a significant role in determining the long-term viability of such a change.
emeralddawn45 ( @emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de ) 8•11 months agoThat’s interesting, but just so you know it’s the website “how stuff works” not the tv show “how it’s made”
nickajeglin ( @nickajeglin@lemmy.one ) 2•11 months agoNo shade on “how it’s made”, it’s one of my favorite shows. But I think a LLM could probably write most of the narration. They primarily describe what is happening on screen. You might have to train one special to have information on industrial and manufacturing processes.
bloodfart ( @bloodfart@lemmy.ml ) 6•11 months agoit absolutely could not.
one of the hallmarks of how its made’s narration is the terse, accurate representation of whats going on. llms are often wrong about things and dont do great at precise descriptions to begin with.
WasPentalive ( @waspentalive@lemmy.one ) 1•11 months agoAh, thanks. I suppose ChatGPT’s take would be the same. - I will have to check that site out.
WasPentalive ( @waspentalive@lemmy.one ) 5•11 months agoI wonder what they will do when the tripe the LLM spews doesn’t match the pictures they are showing.
nickajeglin ( @nickajeglin@lemmy.one ) 1•11 months agoNothing lol.
Altima NEO ( @altima_neo@lemmy.zip ) 4•11 months agoThis seems like a really dumb idea.
Queen HawlSera ( @HawlSera@lemm.ee ) 3•11 months agoChat-GPT became far less useful to me when I realized it will actively lie to you. It was too good to be true it turned out. These people will figure it out eventually, Chat-GPT is not an AI, it’s a god damn “Chinese Room” (It’s a thing in philosophy, look it up)