Hi guys, first of all, I fully support Piracy. But Im writing a piece on my blog about what I might considere as “Ethical Piracy” and I would like to hear your concepts of it.

Basically my line is if I have the capacity of paying for something and is more convinient that pirating, ill pay. It happens to me a lot when I wanna watch a movie with my boyfriend. I like original audio, but he likes dub, so instead of scrapping through the web looking for a dub, I just select the language on the streaming platform. That is convinient to me.

In what situations do you think is not OK to pirate something? And where is 100 justified and everybody should sail the seas instead?

I would like to hear you.

    • fades ( fades@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      Or content you have purchased and have now lost access too, or shit if you buy something at all you can ethically pirate it. You already paid!!

    • Corroded ( CorrodedCranium@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago
      1. You have a physical copy, but want a digital version.

      Kind of similar but I feel like pirating content you have legal access to (Steam, Spotify, Amazon, Netflix, etc.) in a way to get around DRM is ethical.

      For example wanting to listen to songs you have on Spotify on an iPod or reading ebooks purchased from Amazon on your PC.

    • golli ( golli@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Concerning the first point there is also the case of content getting altered. For example TV shows that switch songs because of licensing.

  • dog ( dog@suppo.fi ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 years ago
    1. Content that you cannot acquire by any “lawful” means.
    2. Content that you already own a copy of (Yes, this includes “only” having a “license” to it; you own what you own).
    3. Content that is outrageously priced, and/or from large companies where the people who worked on the product will receive nothing from sold copies. (EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, etc)
      • My take on this is summed up much better by Cory Doctorow, and best written up in the foreword of his book “Makers”, which he published for free online.

        There’s a dangerous group of anti-copyright activists out there who pose a clear and present danger to the future of authors and publishing. They have no respect for property or laws. What’s more, they’re powerful and organized, and have the ears of lawmakers and the press. I’m speaking, of course, of the legal departments at ebook publishers.

        …

        Why am I doing this? Because my problem isn’t piracy, it’s obscurity (thanks, @timoreilly for this awesome aphorism). Because free ebooks sell print books. Because I copied my ass off when I was 17 and grew up to spend practically every discretionary cent I have on books when I became and adult. Because I can’t stop you from sharing it (zeroes and ones aren’t ever going to get harder to copy); and because readers have shared the books they loved forever; so I might as well enlist you to the cause.

        • hoodatninja ( hoodatninja@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          That’s a great excerpt and I’m now interested in this book but it doesn’t really address the issue of money not going to the creator. He’s just in a position where he can afford to go without the income. Millions of artists can not. I imagine neither of us wants art creation to be solely the domain of the wealthy. Reminds me of how in college the only people who could do “good” internships were those who could afford to go a summer (or longer after college) without income and live in D.C. and other expensive cities. It’s wrong to not pay people to do a job of course, but that was a major secondary issue. Only people with money could get the internships that got them jobs that made good money.

  • esty ( esty@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 years ago

    to answer the opposite of your question i would say it’s unethical to steal things from indie developers and creators; the same way its more wrong to steal from a local corner store than it is to steal from Walmart

    • Dreyns ( Dreyns@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      Even though I agree with you, I’d like to enphasize on piracy NOT being theft. Your analogy is great but I prefer to say it again just in case.

    • Rabbit ( Rabbit@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      If items in the physical world could be stolen like it is for digital materials then it would mean the world has created a duplicator. Which would be absolutely awesome and that society has really advanced in technology. So good news all around.

      But, sadly we cannot steal stuff in the real world like we can for digital because there is no duplication machine. There’s no copier so real world theft is going to result in one person losing possession of the item they had.

  • Marxine ( Marxine@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 years ago

    Many people already said stuff I agree with, but I’d also include low-income families being “justified” in pirating stuff, be it for work, study or entertainment (as entertainment is a basic right imo)

    • DigitalBits ( DigitalBits@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Libraries are ethical because they pay for the books. If we’re limited to only physical books, then they buy new ones every ~8-12 rentals. Additionally (though I couldn’t verify this through a search), I’ve heard they also pay more to buy them.

      • How does them paying for it make it more ethical? If I buy a book and put it on libgen does that make it OK then?

        I have never, ever heard of a library rebuying the same book every 8-12 rentals, ever. What do they do with the old ones?

  • I Cast Fist ( ICastFist@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 years ago

    Any piracy related to scientific papers I consider ethical. That kind of knowledge should NEVER be hidden behind a paywall

    Abandonware is a very clear cut case of ethical piracy, too. Without it, a lot of digital stuff “wouldn’t exist” anymore. Mainly games, but also loads of productivity programs, doubly so for discontinued platforms, like Amiga computers.

  • Auriel ( Auriel@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    If it is not available to buy anywhere for me and the only way is piracy, I feel like piracy is justified. No one loses anything on this scenario.

    • Godort ( Godort@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Won’t someone please think of the poor corporations sitting on those IP rights hoping to squeeze them for profit someday?

      You’re practically taking the bread out of the CEOs mouth

  • Underpay ( Underpay@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 years ago

    -Not available to buy or only second hand for exorbitant prices (cough cough Nintendo) -Overpriced subscription (cough cough Adobe) -Getting a version of a game you already bought free of invasive or resource-heavy -Trying out a paid program/game/etc. with the intent of buying it if it you like it and it runs well

  • if you owned a game but your license got pulled for no reason (assassin’s creed)

    although pirating triple a titles is always ethical imo, devs usually get paid the same no matter how the game does

    also pirating to try a game. steams 2 hour refund policy isnt enough, as 2 hours often is not enough to get into a game and see if u like it

    pirating retro games
    if the only way to play a game legitimately is to pay $500 for a cartridge, it’s ok to pirate

    if you can’t afford a game (ex. low income countries), it’s ok to pirate. there are places where a full months salary isn’t enough for a single triple a titile

    • if you owned a game but your license got pulled for no reason (assassin’s creed)

      I’m not quite sure what you mean. So you paid for it (not a physical copy I’m assuming) and when you woke up one day they took it away and you’d have had to pay again to get it? Just understanding what happened here.

          • BearJCC ( BearJCC@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            There are games and software that check a server to see if you are entitled to use it when you run it. If that server goes down or they geo block you, or ban you then you may not use the game or software you purchased (unless you crack/pirate it).

            • Another example of terrible policy no doubt and a great justification for cracks. But I know what AC games he’s talking about and I believe that doesn’t apply here. Correct me if I’m wrong though!

              • BearJCC ( BearJCC@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                In this case you can’t play your purchased dlc (or online multiplayer) but you can still play your game. Games affected: Anno 2070, Assassin’s Creed 2, Assassin’s Creed 3, Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood, Assassin’s Creed Liberation HD, Driver San Francisco, Far Cry 3, Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands, Silent Hunter 5, Space Junkies, and Splinter Cell: Blacklist

  • Queen HawlSera ( HawlSera@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 years ago

    If a product is no longer for sale on any storefront, or the edition for sale is lacking content had by previous versions of the same product, piracy is morally correct for the sake of archival and preservation

    • On a tangential note, this is the same reason I will not buy a phone without expandable storage. The cheapest statistic of a phone is now the difference between a $800 phone and a $1200 phone. For $30 I can double my storage, but that is not ok for manufacturers, especially when they can make $5 a month for 1G of space, that requires internet access, from millions of people. Learning that most people have to pick and choose memorable pictures and videos just because they run out of space is horrendous to me. The companies know that data storage will increase over time for every user, and they are banking on everyone banking their data in a more insecure manner, with them, at an ever increasing rate. I refuse to have my memories and heartfelt data held hostage by bullshit companies that can’t even support their own devices for more than 5 years.