Extinction looms for FTAV’s Mastodon presence
- cacheson ( @cacheson@kbin.social ) 13•1 year ago
but as failed experiments go, this one hasn’t cost anyone $44bn
Zing
- brothershamus ( @brothershamus@kbin.social ) 2•1 year ago
Hi-oooooooo
- Sinnerman ( @Sinnerman@kbin.social ) 12•1 year ago
It’s telling that most of their problems were regulatory/legal rather than technical. (they only have one bullet point about “a bunch of techy stuff”.)
But the whole article has a very strong “how do you do, fellow kids?” vibe. I think the fediverse will manage to survive without the Financial Times’ mastodon server.
- 0x1C3B00DA ( @0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social ) 4•1 year ago
There’s also the point about upgrades and storage growing exponentially, which is one of the most recurring complaints about running a fediverse server. Even the ones that are can lighter than mastodon have to contend with huge databases that never stop growing.
- Corroded ( @CorrodedCranium@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 6•1 year ago
Really shows you need to do your research and take your time when setting up a community
- idoubtit ( @idoubtit@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
So, this sounds entirely different than what the BBC did, which is close their server to just their journalism accounts. I don’t see any issue with that. FT just did it wrong. https://social.bbc/public/local
- emeralddawn45 ( @emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de ) 0•1 year ago
Mastodon administrators have access to everyone’s private messages? Wtf? Is lemmy like that?
- CaptainJanegay ( @CaptainJanegay@kbin.social ) 6•1 year ago
Anyone who owns a server can access all the data stored on it, unless the data is end-to-end encrypted. Whether it’s mastodon, Lemmy, Facebook, twitter, Gmail, vBulletin, whatever.
If you need to say something that you can’t risk anyone else seeing, use an end-to-end encrypted messaging app, or implement encryption yourself using e.g. PGP.
- emeralddawn45 ( @emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de ) 0•1 year ago
I mean I don’t care I’m not saying anything illegal anyway, and I assumed reddit administration could read messages, I’m just surprised. I assumed because of how lemmy started and the whole idea of taking away drastic overreach by admins that private messages would be set up to be… private.
- stevecrox ( @stevecrox@kbin.social ) 1•1 year ago
The admins to perform upgrades, monitoring, fixes, etc… will require root access to the database. That means they can alter all your posts to say *blah blah blah" if they wanted.
Similarly passwords will be encrypted within the database and encryption algorithms have to be able to go in both directions. Normally they need a seed value to start random generation. The admin defines the seed as a result an admin can decrypt everything in the database.
- AnarchoYeasty ( @AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
Please never talk about passwords and encryption again without actually learning what is going on. You have no idea what you are talking about. Passwords are NEVER encrypted because then passwords can be decrypted and stolen. Passwords are salted (a phrase / string of characters is added somewhere in your password) and then hashed. Hashed are one way you cannot convert a hash back into a raw string. The only way to get a password from the hash is to try and hash random passwords until you get one that matches your hash. Hence the salt which is included and different for every account. You’d have to spend forever on each row in order to figure out passwords. If you EVER find someone has stored ENCRYPTED passwords take them out back and beat them up because they are being criminal in their neglect.