Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
soyagi ( soyagi@yiffit.net )  to Science@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago

Voyager 2: Nasa loses contact with record-breaking probe after sending wrong command

www.bbc.com

external-link
message-square
14
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • space
120
external-link

Voyager 2: Nasa loses contact with record-breaking probe after sending wrong command

www.bbc.com

soyagi ( soyagi@yiffit.net )  to Science@lemmy.ml · 3 years ago
message-square
14
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • space
The space agency is listening for any peep of the probe, which has been exploring space since 1977.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • lembas ( lembas@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 years ago

    Voyager 2 is programmed to reset its orientation multiple times each year to keep its antenna pointing at Earth. The next reset is due on 15 October, which Nasa says “should enable communication to resume”.

  • Jakeuphigh ( Jakeuphigh@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 years ago

    You have to appreciate the resilience of the design, though, it says the probe has an automatic reset every few months so it will hopefully recover in October when the next reset occurs

  • thepineapplejumped ( thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 years ago

    Who hasn’t pushed bad code to production?

    • Big P ( peter@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      Imagine executing the command, immediately realising you fucked up and having to wait 36 hours for the response back from the probe

      • vettnerk ( vettnerk@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 years ago

        “7373636272811891 rows affected”

        Shit…

        • ArgentCorvid [Iowa] ( argentcorvid@midwest.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          “lie down on floor
          try not to cry
          cry a lot”

        • MalReynolds ( MalReynolds@slrpnk.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          yeah, bad code to production, not so much, fix with SQL, uh huh…

    • StarkillerX42 ( StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’ve never pushed bad code to production. None of my unit tests fail*.

      * I don’t ever write unit tests

      • thepineapplejumped ( thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        We don’t do that here

    • nutbiggums ( nutbiggums@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s always an intern doing this shit

      • Tiuku ( Tiuku@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        I’d hate to be the person who was supposed to review it…

  • anemonemone ( anemonemone@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    shit

  • mackwinston ( mackwinston@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    I find it stressful enough doing an update on a remote server (where there’s someone in support who can reboot the box if it all goes wrong). It’s got to be something else to send commands to a spacecraft that’s now light hours away. It’s not just that you can’t exactly go out and troubleshoot the hardware, it’s also that the ping time is rather extreme so you won’t know for hours if you’ve screwed up or not!

  • PowerCrazy ( PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    If the probe is finally dead i.e. we can no longer communicate with it, I feel like it would be a fittingly ignoble end.

Science@lemmy.ml

science@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@lemmy.ml

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 51 users / week
  • 246 users / month
  • 1.24K users / 6 months
  • 397 local subscribers
  • 22.3K subscribers
  • 1.61K Posts
  • 2.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase ( MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code