- cross-posted to:
- environment
TL;DR:
A southwest Missouri river already contaminated with E. coli could soon receive up to 350,000 gallons of wastewater daily from a meatpacking facility.
You must log in or register to comment.
And this as we’re seeing stories from other areas about massive die-offs due to eutrophication. Animal waste is hugely eutrophying to waterways, and this is well-documented. We just never learn.
Stop eating meat, folks. Under current circumstances, the planet just can’t take it.
I should stop eating meat because legislators are corrupt? That’s an interesting thought process you have there. I’m sure your biases had no impact on your totally logical conclusion. /s
You are enabling that corruption though and have the active choice to not do
Environmental problems are more inherent to meat production than that. The best-case production of animal products comes out worse than the worst case production of plants for human consumption
Transitioning to plant-based diets (PBDs) has the potential to reduce diet-related land use by 76%, diet-related greenhouse gas emissions by 49%, eutrophication by 49%, and green and blue water use by 21% and 14%, respectively, whilst garnering substantial health co-benefits
[…]
Plant-based foods have a significantly smaller footprint on the environment than animal-based foods. Even the least sustainable vegetables and cereals cause less environmental harm than the lowest impact meat and dairy products [9].
@GrumbleGrim @inasaba you should stop eating meat because it lowers your carbon footprint. Simple.
Capitalist dictators gonna dictate