• I am a bit puzzled. Why are they forced to invest into fossil fuel projects when they are, as stated, not profitable enough?

    Is the problem that they need energy projects and all of them are too expensive or is fossil fuel the problem because it already exists ? Also Fossil fuels are also widely used by the “Rich” countries.

    •  Infectoid   ( @Infectoid@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      I don’t really understand it properly but it seems that the debt repayment is pegged to future fossil fuel revenue.

      Mozambique was plunged into a debt crisis when oil and gas prices fell in 2014-16, Ribeiro said, but the solutions from international lenders to bail out the country have relied on loans being repaid through future gas revenues.

      So I guess they can’t not repay the debt and they can only pay it back one way.

    • Basicly these countries are in massive debt and have to repay their loans. The only realistic way of doing it is to extract fossil fuels.

      Also having too much debt makes renewable investment less attractive. Generally speaking most green technologies are expensive in the begining and then make a good profit. Like you first have to pay for installig solar panels, but then they are nearly free to run. However fossil fuels are cheap to built initially, but then are expensive to operate due to fuel costs. If your country is in massive debt, it becomes much harder to make the inital investment into fossil fuels. Argentina for example should really be able to invest a lot into renewables as a relativly wealthy country. However bad financial policy has made that nearly impossible.