• pH3ra ( pH3ra@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s just my opinion (since it’s not in the article) but a thing that makes Gnome and Libadwaita a “modern design” is the fact that the production behind it tries to bridge the gap between a “mouse and keyboard” and a “touch screen” workflow.
    None of the other DEs come even close to Gnome when used on a tablet

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼ ( Zeus@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      meh, subjectively i find that creates a “worst of both worlds” situation. but this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

      • pH3ra ( pH3ra@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

        yeah sorry, I should have been more specific with my answer: features like this are supposed to help you in a touch screen situation or in general with smaller screens.
        When the window is resized under a certain size, the left panel becomes hidden and with it part of the top bar, to make it less cluttered and confusing.

          • pH3ra ( pH3ra@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            The difference is minimal, in the newer version you have 1 less element when the sidebar is collapsed (the hamburger menu).
            Generally speaking Gnome 44 is already well optimized, 45 is going to be a more “tweaks and small improvements” kind of update rather than a big design changes