• Seems like gaming piracy is really dying this time for sure. Most sites are compromised and untrustworthy, big teams are retiring, the one remaining denuvo cracker that i heard of is apparently psychotic… It doesn’t seem like it bodes well

      • Looking at the world rn, I dont think things have a tendency to get better on their own. In a decade or two people won’t even believe we lived in the wild west era of internet where you could just get stuff for free without a subscription, online connection or drm.

        • When people run out of money to pay for a billion subscriptions, companies will have to think hard about their business model. I don’t think the current trend can last forever.

          Look at the fragmentation of streaming services. Piracy is on the rise again because of it.

          • That’s why I said gaming piracy before, I don’t think denuvo can protect media files (yet) and those are less likely to be malware or cryptominers anyway. So I think that aspect is safe for now at least, but rip gaming.

        •  DudePluto   ( @DudePluto@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          182 years ago

          Looking at the world rn, I dont think things have a tendency to get better on their own

          This is called a recency bias (I think lol) - you’re looking at the world rn and assuming its trends must continue. When you look at history you see that there are ebbs and flows, and that stasis is rare. If you focus on certain things, you may certainly decide we’re in a downtrend. There will always be an uptrend afterward. And vice versa

          • That’s way too big of a generalization. The fact is that technology advances and makes other technology obsolete, and the pirates are dwindling while DRM companies are getting more and more money to fix the issue. It is not going to just magically reverse at one point. If anything the people are just going to get more accustomed to it like they have already with copyright laws, subscription services and simply not owning anything digital anymore.

            The second thing you’re not addressing is how long the “ebb and flow” takes anyway, if gaming piracy has a resurgence in 50 years then I don’t think I’m gonna care much about it by then lol. Blizzard games aren’t getting cracked anymore and by the time they do, if ever, I’m not going to care about them.

            •  DudePluto   ( @DudePluto@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The fact is that technology advances and makes other technology obsolete,

              Yeah, it happens on both sides, it’s an arms race. It will swing the other way eventually - it always has and always will

              The second thing you’re not addressing is how long the “ebb and flow” takes anyway

              That was intentional. There’s no estimating a timeline, but with the development of technology it’s not unreasonable to expect a reversal even in a decade. Anyway, if you’re trying to ward off doomerism you’re not going to do it by only looking at what you stand to gain

    •  Kissaki   ( @Kissaki@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 years ago

      Current AI is not smarter than humans. It needs supervised training, and then acts according to that. That’s inherently incompatible to novelty and correct exploration.

        •  Kissaki   ( @Kissaki@feddit.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          That assessment entirely depends on what you consider “complex” and “easy”.

          What do you mean by it’s bad at doing easy things but good at doing complex things? I don’t see how something complex would work better than something easy.

          • In short.

            Look up what AI does good right now, like finding complex solutions to mathematical issues a human couldn’t. Calculate stuff very fast, replicate natural language etc.

            Look up what AI struggles with at the moment, like drawing hands or recognizing objects or driving a car.

            This statement is only valid in this current state, as AI is advancing faster than most peoples mind by now. Most people have yet to understand LLM or generative AI models.

            That’s what I’m talking about. If you look at the process required to crack Denuvo, then you’ll notice that there’s a lot of guesswork done, something the AI is good at if learned properly. The amount of people who know how to and are willing to spend time cracking Denuvo is shrinking by the day. The amount of software DRM encrypted is rising every day. We need automation soon.

            AI will soon be mandatory for software security as malicious actors will use AI to find zero day exploits and you want an AI to protect you from those real time threats. Anti Virus software already work somewhat into that direction by now but there’s still much room.

      • This problem seems like the sort of thing machine learning could be good at though. You have some input binary code that doesn’t run, you want an output that does, you have available training data of inputs and correct matching outputs.

      • No, any sufficiently advanced A.I can and will outclass humans. For example: there are chess A.I’s that have beaten GM’s as good as Magnus Carlsen on multiple occasions. The better an A.I gets at something the tougher it becomes to counter it. This is one of the biggest risks of A.I development that one day we might make something that makes us seem obsolete. On the positive side that day is really really far.

        •  Kissaki   ( @Kissaki@feddit.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          Where between being beaten in chess and making us obsolete do you think we are? Where do you think cracking games is between chess and human mind?

          I think your estimation is off by a lot.

        • ok.

          i have my own opinions on ai, but all of that doesnt matter in relation to cracking denuvo because humans can and do crack it.

          i bet everyone with the skills to reverse engineer it has a nice job in cybersecurity (like working at denuvo), instead of cracking video games for some donations.

        •  Auli   ( @Auli@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I don’t know if AI is technically better it’s just different and doesn’t play like a human. Humans hate lossing pieces but AI doesn’t care as long as the outcome is a win.

          • Newsflash: Humans also sacrifice pieces in chess. Chess engines are mathematical beasts that are designed for these things only. But what is more important: Chess engines also needs to be made by humans.

          • AI absolutely plays like a human as it’s trained by humans. The only difference is, AI will do the most optimal move, while humans might hesitate. That’s also the reason why it’s bad to put AI into fighter or bomber jets. The AI has a clear goal but a human might struggle to fire at an unknown target. Because the human has to life with the consequences.

            • all im saying is that, if I own the CPU that runs the game, there are incredible advanced techniques for reverse engineering, and given enough time and effort i think it would always be possible.

              encryption isnt exactly the same thing here, because encrypted data just sits there until its unencrypted, but it NEEDS to be unencrypted for your CPU to run it.

              the CPU has to read code that it can execute, and if you can get that code, its probably impossible to have an uncrackable game. that doesnt apply to video game cracking, but I’m sure the NSA could crack denuvo if they wanted to, and could crack any game DRM.

              at the very extreme, if i know the state of all of the transistors and etc inside my computer, nothing is uncrackable. thats all I’m trying to say. yes denuvo will likely get too complicated for anyone to try to crack it, but given enough time and resources, it would be cracked.