Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Chloyster [she/her]   ( @chloyster@beehaw.org ) M to Gaming · 2 years ago

BattleBit Remastered is dominating Steam because there's no catch: it's just a lot of game for $15

www.pcgamer.com

external-link
message-square
147
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • battlebit@discuss.online
  • pcgaming@lemmy.fmhy.ml
  • PCGaming@kbin.social
433
external-link

BattleBit Remastered is dominating Steam because there's no catch: it's just a lot of game for $15

www.pcgamer.com

 Chloyster [she/her]   ( @chloyster@beehaw.org ) M to Gaming · 2 years ago
message-square
147
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • battlebit@discuss.online
  • pcgaming@lemmy.fmhy.ml
  • PCGaming@kbin.social
One of the best new multiplayer games of 2023 has no microtransactions.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  •  SyperStronkHero   ( @SyperStronkHero@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a great game but there IS a catch that wasn’t mentioned.

    The devs plan on implementing one of the more intrusive Anti-Cheats (Face It Anti Cheat) which doesn’t work on Linux which also stops all Steam Deck users from playing. It also forces you to disable virtualization on windows. I can’t recall the last time I had to go into bios to disable an option to turn off important windows features.

    According to their stream, it’s non-negotiable and will be added regardless of what the community wants. But they did mention that community servers would be able to pick which Anti Cheat they wanted to use?

    •  HER0   ( @HER0@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 years ago

      But they did mention that community servers would be able to pick which Anti Cheat they wanted to use?

      As I understand, there are three tiers to this:

      • Official servers will use FaceIt exclusively.
      • Servers rented from official partners will have the choice of FaceIt or EAC.
      • Community-run servers will only be able to use EAC, and won’t be hooked into the global progression system.

      One of the many problems with FaceIt is that the server-side component is not allowed to be freely distributed, which is why community-run servers won’t have the option to use it.

      Personally, there is no way I am buying this unless if they reverse their plans to use FaceIt.

      •  drifty   ( @drifty@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will also not be buying this unless they don’t use FACEIT

        •  Jerkface (any/all)   ( @jerkface@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Your avatar is totally alphanumeric. I have a pink guitar named Machibuse.

          •  drifty   ( @drifty@sopuli.xyz ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m sorry what does this mean 😅

            •  Jerkface (any/all)   ( @jerkface@lemmy.ca ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              It means “ambusher” but it is the Japanese name of Pinky the ghost.

    •  Terrasque   ( @theterrasque@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 years ago

      Disable virtualization? Hah right. Yeah, that’s a no go.

      •  Stahlreck   ( @Stahlreck@feddit.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well tbf, on most devices it’s usually disabled by default so this is one of the typical “well 99% of our users are unaffected so eat it or go away”. Always kinda dick-ish to do something like this.

    •  Jamie   ( @Jamie@jamie.moe ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      From what I read, it also requires Secure Boot to be enabled. I played the game for 90 minutes before reading about the anti-cheat change, fortunately I didn’t hit 2 hours and took a refund.

    •  Tokeli   ( @Tokeli@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      As someone that uses virtual machines frequently, I look at my like 16 hours in the game. Fuck. I hope they don’t do that, this is the Battlefield I’ve been wanting for years. ;-;

    •  Jerkface (any/all)   ( @jerkface@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, fuck. My hopes were raised and then dashed in the span of minutes.

    •  Mummelpuffin   ( @Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, shit. I hope I have under two hours so I can refund it.

      •  MangoPenguin   ( @MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        You can likely get a refund even over 2 hours for this.

    •  NotAPenguin   ( @NotAPenguin@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’ve backed down from faceit for now because of community concern.

      •  SyperStronkHero   ( @SyperStronkHero@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        They haven’t backed down at all. They’re still committed to implementing FaceIt according to the devs in their discord. The only reason it’s not implemented now is because of privacy concerns so they’re trying to rework it a bit.

  •  ultrasquid   ( @ultrasquid@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    2 years ago

    I considered it, but am now avoiding it because they’re going to add a Linux-incompatible anticheat.

  •  Dead   ( @dead@keylog.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was about to buy this but apparently they are planning to change their current anti cheat software to FaceIt which does not support Linux. EAC is still used for upcoming selfhosted servers but ranking up is disabled. I’d rather not feel like being considered as a second class citizen so I’ll have to skip for now.

    Other than that the game looks fun. I prefer to look in to the current state of the game rather than the promises of future content (which kind of contradicts my anti cheat point but eh), and I feel like the current price would be worth it even though it’s an early access game.

    •  thann   ( @thann@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      yeah, Im enjoying it right now, but if they choose to make my experience not playable, I would expect a refund =/

    •  Nyoelle   ( @Nyoelle@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yep, same here.

      Thankfully there is enough games for me to be happy

  •  quortez   ( @quortez@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 years ago

    I love to see indie games pop off. I hate to see Linux-hostile anti-cheats. C’est a la vie.

    •  wallmenis   ( @wallmenis@lemmy.one ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dafaq you are talking about? I see people have no problem running the game with and older version of proton.

      •  NeonWoofGenesis   ( @NeonWoofGenesis@kek.henlo.fi ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        See other comments. They are gonna implement Face It anticheat which won’t work with linux.

        •  wallmenis   ( @wallmenis@lemmy.one ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh, crap! That’s bad! Hopefully they change their mind!

          •  Jimbo   ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            From what I understand they are going full steam ahead and fuck community feedback

      •  Demacish   ( @Demacish@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        The devs plan on implementing a anti-cheat system that makes it incompatible with Linux and virtualization on Windows

  •  RecluseGamer   ( @RecluseGamer@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been having a lot of fun with it. Even if I only get a few weeks or months until they add FACEIT, it’s worth the $15.

    •  drifty   ( @drifty@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      FACEIT really is a bummer

      •  tj111   ( @tj111@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was interested about this game by the article, but what is FACEIT?

        •  Riskable   ( @riskable@programming.dev ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 years ago

          FACEIT is yet another completely useless, doesn’t-actually-work, trust-the-client anti-cheating tool. Basically, it makes it so that cheaters (and the game publisher) can claim cheating isn’t happening because, “there’s an anti-cheat tool” but in reality it doesn’t stop actual cheaters.

          The entire purpose of anti-cheat tools appears to be to stop casual Linux gamers from being able to play the game. Microsoft has a big part in it as well because the very same intentional vulnerabilities in Windows that hackers use to install undetectable rootkits are what get used by anti-cheat software.

          If Microsoft wanted they could close those vulnerabilities by making all privilege levels above administrator (of which Windows has two which is insane) inaccessible to anyone but Microsoft. Instead they just collect money from 3rd party vendors to sign their driver encryption keys, inherently trusting those vendors not to make software with vulnerabilities. It’s a recipe for insecurity and Microsoft likes it that way. It acts as a form of vendor lock-in.

          Anti-cheat tools pretty much all work with the same basic assumption: Trust the client. What’s the first rule of network programming? Never trust the client!

        •  bdonvr   ( @bdonvr@thelemmy.club ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          Anti-cheat, I assume it breaks Linux compatibility and/or runs with basically unlimited permissions on your PC

          Edit: details here

        •  Snowmonkey   ( @Snowmonkey@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          From what I understand, FACEIT is a “better” anti cheat that the developers want to use to replace the current Easy Anti Cheat. Their current implementation of Easy Anti Cheat supports Linux and Steam Deck while FACEIT does not, and will not support Linux

      •  Eelviny   ( @Eelviny@feddit.nl ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Honestly though, I hate it but I do kind of get it. If this game gets overrun by hackers in its prime, the game dies and I’d really like to see this survive long term as this is the kind of pricing model I’d like to support. Can’t have everything perfect.

        But it will only make sense if FACEIT achieves that goal. Time will tell, and I’ll keep my windows dual boot for gaming for now.

    •  Uriel-238   ( @Uriel238@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      So there’s a catch after all.

    •  myofficialaccount   ( @myofficialaccount@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      What does that mean and how does it change the game?

      Edit: nevermind, someone further down explained already.

  •  smart_boy   ( @smart_boy@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    The game itself is a workmanlike Battlefield with a few oddball choices. I hope they never “fix” the vaulting behaviour that lets you break a 20-storey fall and make massive jumps across rooftops.

    But I’ve specifically been having a lot of fun with the proximity chat. Remarkably robust, has an opt-in “broadcast your mic for a few seconds when you die” feature, and somehow isn’t a sluice of slurs / edgy crap / etc (at least in my experience).

    The anticheat news is really depressing though. Cheaters are out there and will come to this game, and EAC at least has a reputation of being quite weak. We’re not allowed to have nice things.

    •  Browning   ( @Browning@lemmy.fmhy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The parkour is fun

  •  Snart   ( @ivereadalltheory@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    How does it run on Linux?

    •  Zenaida macroura   ( @Zenaida_macroura@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Fine for now. They’re eventually going to use FACEIT anticheat which doesn’t work on linux

      https://www.gamepressure.com/newsroom/battlebit-remastered-faceit-x-easy-anti-cheat-linux-and-steam-dec/z45924

      •  conciselyverbose   ( @conciselyverbose@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 years ago

        Dude could really use a pass by a native speaker. A lot of that sentence structure is pretty rough.

        But yeah, that’s enough to keep me from buying it. I won’t use Windows again.

      •  Awwab   ( @Awwab@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s unfortunate

      •  Relvoth   ( @Relvoth@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        •  NoxiousPluK   ( @NoxiousPluK@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes but they won’t count for ranked

    •  RandomStickman   ( @RandomStickman@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you are in to singleplayer bot matches Ravenfield is pretty cool. The game’s workshop is vast, so you can go from a WWI shooter to 40K and everything in between.

      It’s natively Linux so that’s neat as well

      •  lumpeh   ( @lumpeh@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d also like to mention Easy Red 2 for this too. WW2 only (for now) but its all about playing with the bots and does run decent on a Deck.

        •  Zenaida macroura   ( @Zenaida_macroura@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          They’re adding modding soon, so maybe it could become a semi-realistic ravenfield?

  •  unsunny   ( @unsunny@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Looks interesting; one of the things keeping me away from some FPS games is the sheer amount of micro transactions. I’d spend 15 and get something good and fair for everyone who plays instead of being asked to put in another purchase every few minutes!

    •  🗑️😸   ( @trash@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been playing this game a lot the past few days. it’s just plain fun. A nice refreshing FPS in the era of BRs and battle passes.

  •  Zook3y   ( @Zook3y@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a great game! Runs super smoothly and it’s got a lot of great QoL features. $15 is a steal

    •  jaye   ( @jaye@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Exactly the same sentiment here! It has no business being as good as it is!

  •  Kissaki   ( @Kissaki@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    BattleBit Remastered on Steam

    BattleBit Remastered is a low-poly, massive multiplayer FPS, supporting 254 players per server. Battle on a near-fully destructible map with various vehicles!

  •  andrew   ( @andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Stop it. I have too many steam games already. But at this point, what’s one more? You convinced me.

  •  jgrim   ( @jgrim@discuss.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m past the refund period. I wish I knew this sooner.

    •  Illumilux   ( @Illumilux@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      The refund period isn’t a hard set in stone thing. Send support a request and it’s likely to be granted. When tlou came out plenty of people with way more than 2 hours got refunds.

      •  jgrim   ( @jgrim@discuss.online ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m mostly concerned about not being able to play it on Steamdeck anymore. I can still play it on PC. But doesn’t seem like a good choice to have that anti cheat. Thanks, gotta think about it.

  •  ampersandrew   ( @ampersandrew@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    The catch is that you can’t yet run your own servers or LAN, from what I’ve seen.

    •  SyperStronkHero   ( @SyperStronkHero@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      In the servers browser I’ve noticed some community ones but there are only a few and mostly in different regions. Hopefully they will open it up for more players to host soon.

  •  Communist   ( @communist@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been playing a ton of combat master.

    F2p with no bs, I love it, and it has a proper Linux client, it even runs natively on Wayland for me.

    •  ampersandrew   ( @ampersandrew@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It says it has LAN, but I couldn’t find the option anywhere. Do you know how to do that by any chance?

      •  Communist   ( @communist@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m under the impression that it automatically runs as a lan if everyone in the custom game is on the same network.

        I could be wrong.

        •  ampersandrew   ( @ampersandrew@kbin.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hmm…not sure I like them defining that as LAN if you need an internet connection to find the other players in the first place.

          •  Communist   ( @communist@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            you need an internet connection to add them as friends in-game, but once they’re added as friends in game it should work.

  •  iNeedScissors67   ( @iNeedScissors67@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    LevelCap has a great video about how 3 guys made a better battlefield game then EA/DICE. I had fun the one night I’ve gotten to play so far but I was kind of drunk so I didn’t do very well. I’m a Battlefield player of many years and it’s the most fun I’ve had playing since 4.

    •  Jimbo   ( @Jimbo@yiffit.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What a shame their throwing it all away with terrible anticheat

Gaming

gaming

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !gaming@beehaw.org

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 178 users / day
  • 486 users / week
  • 1.61K users / month
  • 4.69K users / 6 months
  • 4.31K local subscribers
  • 33K subscribers
  • 4.09K Posts
  • 66.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Whom   ( @Whom@beehaw.org ) 
  •  The_Hunted_One   ( @The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Chloyster [she/her]   ( @chloyster@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code