Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) M to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 3 years ago

Ted Nugent; another victim of “reader added context” on Twitter.

feddit.uk

message-square
55
link
fedilink
528

Ted Nugent; another victim of “reader added context” on Twitter.

feddit.uk

SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) M to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 3 years ago
message-square
55
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Amongst other allegations, Courtney Love said they had oral sex when she was just 12 years old.

    More about the allegations against him here.

    • gullible ( gullible@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      3 years ago

      What an awful day to be literate.

    • sharpiemarker ( Sharpiemarker@feddit.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 years ago

      🤮

    • Asymptote ( Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 years ago

      Huh, se he’s one of the reason Courtney Love is that way that she is.

  • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 years ago

    I respect but also feel sorry for people who are sexually attracted to children, but manage to control themselves. They have to work extra hard constantly just to not be monsters, while the rest of us never even have to worry about that.

    • RaincoatsGeorge ( RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 years ago

      Well this is certainly a thing that someone typed once. I’d counter that it’s not simply that people are innocently attracted to children and therefore deserve sympathy. I’d say there’s more involved in that attraction. You can’t reasonably engage in any romantic or sexual abuse encounter with a child without there being a totally lopsided power dynamic and a high degree of exploitation. I’d argue that for all such people this is what draws them to it. Within that context it’s not some innocent ‘miswiring’ of the brain but instead an individual that is completely unhealthy and mentally unwell that is entertaining the idea of grooming some child. That’s the part they are after.

      I know there’s a movement to try and see pedophiles as anything but what they are and you can sit and have thought experiments about ‘the ones that act vs those that don’t’ but at the end of the day you are left with a deeply unwell individual that desperately needs inpatient psychiatric treatment, psychiatric medication, extensive counseling, and total separation from any children.

      • hh93 ( hh93@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 years ago

        Exactly - they need treatment and help so they don’t act on it - but with the demonizing that’s happening I’d guess that most of them are too scared to open up and try to fight their urge on their own.

        I’d guess that pretty much no-one wants to normalise pedophilia in a way that makes acting that attraction out normal but making it more normal to talk about if and seek help similar to how depressions aren’t nearly as stigmatized as 50 years ago

      • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        That is absolutely a worthwhile argument. I definitely agree with you about treatment, medication, and counseling. Total separation from children is probably for the best, as well. If these people can be helped, they should be - not just for their own benefit, but for the improvement of society as a whole.

      • Serdan ( Serdan@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        Well, you’d be wrong. Pedophilia is well studied. It’s attraction to children, and there’s a huge amount of variation in how that is expressed and how the psychology around it develops through a person’s life. Baselessly claiming that all people with pedophilia are just rapists who want easy prey is unhelpful nonsense.

        • Resonosity ( Resonosity@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          After all, the word stems from the suffix “philia” which means tendency or affinity towards, as opposed to “phobia” which means aversion or separation from. Philia is used for a lot of words as a suffix for literally meaning affinity towards, like in the word “hydrophilic” or affinity towards (bearing) water, but it can also denote interest or attraction as in “audiophile” (interested in audio), “cynophile” (interested in or lover of canines/dogs), or “gynophile” (interested or loving of women).

          Here’s the definition and further background about “pedophile”.

      • xigoi ( xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yes, they need treatment – and threatening them with torture and death will discourage them from seeking treatment.

    • stebo ( stebo02@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 years ago

      I respect people who […] manage to control themselves

      That’s such a weird thing to say though.

      Imagine you are in love with someone but they are not interested. Do you take pride in the fact you didn’t rape/groom them because you “managed to control yourself”?

      We’re not animals. Controlling your sexual desires should be trivial for any decent human being.

      • chicken ( chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 years ago

        Controlling your sexual desires should be trivial

        Maybe it should be, but is it actually trivial? Addiction in general is a real thing, isn’t it? For someone with say an eating disorder, maintaining a healthy diet isn’t trivial at all. Paraphilias are different morally where they involve harming others and not just yourself and so it’s more important to not act on them, but I’m not sure that means it’s easier for a person with a paraphilia than it is for other sorts of people struggling with controlling their behavior.

        IMO what it comes down to isn’t whether these people deserve sympathy though, the more important consideration is preventing abuse. To me what the OP image shows is that the “just kill 'em all” attitude is unhelpful bullshit leading to pedophiles and abusers hiding in plain sight. What would be better is a conditionally supportive community that knows what they are and keeps tabs on them well enough to make sure they stay away from kids.

        • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          Thank you. Your response is better than mine would have been. I especially like what you have to say about the “‘just kill ‘em all’ attitude “.

        • ParsnipWitch ( ParsnipWitch@feddit.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Feeling sexually attracted is not the same as addiction. If it starts to feel like withdrawal from addiction you have something else going on as well (for example an actual sex addiction). Additionally, pedophiles aren’t necessarily exclusively attracted to children.

          I do think they should have access to mental health care and they obviously shouldn’t be incarcerated or threatened with death. But having respect for them for not abusing children is taking it way too far.

          I also don’t respect serial killers for every day they don’t murder someone, I don’t respect racists for every person they pass without punching them, etc.

      • ContentConsumer9999 ( ContentConsumer9999@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 years ago

        Welp, it’s clear these aren’t mentally well people so something that’s just expected from normal people can be an achievement for them.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 years ago

          Removed by mod

          • hglman ( hglman@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 years ago

            That doesn’t mean that they don’t deserve help. Suppression isn’t a solution. It’s a way for people to pretend its all ok.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              3 years ago

              Removed by mod

              • ContentConsumer9999 ( ContentConsumer9999@kbin.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                3 years ago

                Replace “pedophile” with “rapist” in your arguments and ask yourself whether what you’re saying is convincing.

                Welp, I’d much rather live in a world where people that have thoughts of rape are encouraged to go to therapy and work through it than one where they all just keep themselves in check.

                I’m not saying pedophiles don’t have agency in the matter or something. I’m saying we should try to cure them before they hurt people.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Removed by mod

              • scaramantulatte ( scaramantulatte@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                3 years ago

                You are jumping to a lot of wild conclusions and making some bold assumptions in your argument. I don’t really wanna take a stance on this one way or the other as I have no idea what is the mindset of these people, but just reading thru this, your comment sticks out as you have all the answers and everything is either black or white. I dislike your conjecturing attitude.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Removed by mod

              • callouscomic ( callouscomic@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 years ago

                I wish you the best in overcoming the hurt and anger in your life that is showing here.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Removed by mod

              • twelve20two  ( Twelve20two@slrpnk.net ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Could you explain how they’re not ill?

                • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Removed by mod

          • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I didn’t read that comment as excusing a crime. I read it as stating that self control, which is normal for us, is an achievement for pedophiles.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 years ago

              Removed by mod

              • Zitronensaft ( Zitronensaft@feddit.de ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Thoughts aren’t crimes, actions are. Everyone has intrusive thoughts at some point or another. If you are going to criminalize thoughts alone, you might as well condemn all of humanity.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants ( pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz ) Banned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Removed by mod

          • ContentConsumer9999 ( ContentConsumer9999@kbin.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I’m not saying what they do should be excused. I’m just saying they very well should be respected for keeping themselves in check.

            • stebo ( stebo02@sopuli.xyz ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              3 years ago

              You should respect me then for keeping myself from commiting a coup and establishing a communist regime.

              • ContentConsumer9999 ( ContentConsumer9999@kbin.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                Sure, as long as you agree you should be put in an asylum.

      • arefx ( arefx@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I get what you are saying but I think it’s probably easier in general for people in normal relationships because even if they get rejected, they have an opportunity to form a relationship with someone else. Someone attracted to minors never gets that chance. They aren’t allowed (for good reason) to even try.

        Obviously pedophilia isnt a great thing and pedophiles who abuse children should be punished severely, but I don’t think it’s a choice to be born attracted to minors. So it’s unfortunate for them. Definitely not an easy topic.

      • hglman ( hglman@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        I am sure you said this to gay people, too.

        • stebo ( stebo02@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          what mental gymnastics did you perform to jump to that conclusion?

    • bermuda ( bermuda@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 years ago

      I have a sneaking feeling that I’ll need some popcorn when looking at replies to this comment. I’ll be back later

      • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah, I almost didn’t post it. We’ll see!

        • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 years ago

          No, I’m glad you posted it. It’s a valid point and I agree with you. Living in constant fear, disgust and denial must be exhausting and terrifying.

          I’ll be keeping a close eye on the comments so this remains a civil discussion.

    • moog ( moog@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 years ago

      okay but ted nugent doesnt control himself

      • HonkyTonkWoman ( HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 years ago

        Your point is valid, but my assumption when reading this comment is that Nugent is not someone that falls into op’s sphere of empathy.

        Completely agree that Ted definitely does not appear to have exercised any restraint on his urges.

        Not defending or attacking op’s comment, just trying to read it correctly.

        • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 years ago

          You have read it correctly. I appreciate it.

      • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        I’m not talking about him, then, am I?

    • Daisy (she/her) ( TechieDamien@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      And even when they do control themselves consistently without fail, most people would still look down on them if they knew…

  • uphillbothways ( uphillbothways@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 years ago

    Republicans love him because of course they would.

    • Godort ( Godort@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 years ago

      The only other musician that’s firmly in their camp is Kid Rock and I wouldn’t wish that fate on anyone

      • moog ( moog@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 years ago

        and kid rock also wrote a song about diddling kids that appeared in the movie Osmosis Jones!

        “Young ladies, young ladies, I like 'em underage see Some say that’s statutory (But I say it’s mandatory)”

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 years ago

          I try and ignore Kid Rock as much as possible and didn’t think my opinion of him could get any lower. I was wrong, very, very wrong.

        • magnetosphere  ( HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 years ago

          Gross

    • chunkystyles ( chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 years ago

      They are the party of “every allegation is an admission”.

    • kindenough ( kindenough@kbin.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      My shit pants guy

  • sverit ( sverit@feddit.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 years ago

    Link for the lazy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nugent#Relationships_with_teenage_girls

  • ArugulaZ ( ArugulaZ@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    Oh boy, this guy. The Motor City Moron strikes again!

  • Margot Robbie ( MargotRobbie@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    These celebrities really needs to find better hobbies than posting on Twitter/X.

    Like shitposting on Lemmy.

    Also, ew, Ted Nugent.

  • traveler ( traveler@lemdro.id ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    We have way too many pedophilia in the “elites”. I’m starting to think it’s a mandatory trait for you to be in the “elites”.

  • sleepy ( Boi@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Fun fact: that’s how we get rose bushes.

  • ArcaneSlime ( ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ok but how are sexualities and plants related? I understand the joke is “kill pedos” but I’m missing something, can anyone help connect the dots?

    • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      Have you ever had an IQ test or similar? You sometimes get questions like “A car is to transport, what a fork is to ___” with the answer being “cutlery”. It’s not that transport/cutlery or cars/forks have anything in common, it’s about their relationship to the group.

      So in the post it’s saying that “if you think paedophilla is just a type of sexuality, then murdering someone and burying their body is just a type of gardening”. It’s not exactly a flawless comparison, but that’s what they were going for.

      • ArcaneSlime ( ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        …so I understand where you’re going with this, but I think it is such a poor attempt on his part that I’m still trying to understand it lmao. I guess you’re right, what else could it be really? Still makes no sense to me though.

        • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Like I said, it’s not the best example but it’s also not the worst one of these I’ve heard, they can get really really obscure. Maybe this is a better explanation/translation:

          “If paedophilla is as innocent as a “sexual orientation”, then burying your dead body in my garden is as innocent as “gardening.”

          • ArcaneSlime ( ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            OH ok yeah your rephrasing here connected the dots, thanks. Hell it’s definitely one of the dumbest I’ve seen, I do not envy you lmao. Thanks for the help on that!

            • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              No problem, sorry I didn’t make it clearer the first time. Like you said, it’s not the easiest example to (tenuously) explain!

  • squiblet ( squiblet@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

Murdered by Words@feddit.uk

murderedbywords@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !murderedbywords@feddit.uk

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

  • Personal appearance (“You’re fat”, “You’re ugly”)
  • Posts with little-to-no context
  • Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
  • Dick jokes, “Yo mama”, “No, you” type responses and other low effort insults
  • “Your values are bad” without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong (“I believe in capitalism” - “Well, then you must be evil” or “Fuck you you ignorant asshole”)

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 22 users / week
  • 831 users / month
  • 1.44K users / 6 months
  • 32 local subscribers
  • 2.58K subscribers
  • 46 Posts
  • 546 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SomeoneElseMod ( SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk ) 
  • SomeoneElse ( SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code