•  Elise   ( @xilliah@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m from the nl and so many people fly for their holidays. It’s simply not necessary. And a lot of these trips sound like visiting an attraction park to me rather than genuine travel and learning about other cultures, which would actually have some benefit.

    Edit: I’d like to add that I think cultural exchange is better done through programs such as the Erasmus program. We could extend it to more people, but they should live with someone from the other culture and for a longer period. Further, it should be an exchange and not just some rich kid visiting a ‘developing’ country.

  • 🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    Airlines that use Schiphol including Air France-KLM (AIRF.PA) have sued to try to prevent the cap at one of Europe’s busiest airports.

    The decision is “arbitrary, ill-thought out and undercuts procedures normally used,” said Ourania Georgoutsakou, managing director of industry group Airlines For Europe (A4E).

    The government’s main reason for the cap is to address noise pollution, but it has also cited the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as recurring logistical problems at the airport.

    The International Air Transport Association (IATA), which supports the airlines’ case, on Thursday told the Dutch caretaker government not to proceed ahead of a national election in November.

    “In a few months’ time, this government will not be accountable for the severe consequences that may follow from the Schiphol decision, particularly with respect to relations with the Netherlands’ trading partners, and lost jobs and prosperity at home,” IATA said in a statement.

    At a press conference, outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte confirmed that the U.S. Department of Transport had sent the Dutch government a letter airing concerns about the cap, which he said would be addressed.


    Saved 48% of original text.