SUMMARY
- The EU has identified WhatsApp as a gatekeeper in the messaging industry and has given it a few months to enable interoperability with other apps.
- The EU’s Digital Markets Act aims to promote fair competition and give consumers more options for alternative services.
- WhatsApp has already begun working on interoperability with other apps, potentially allowing smaller players like Signal to compete more fairly.
- Avid Amoeba ( @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ) English71•1 year ago
Signal will soon be your one stop solution for all your chat apps
Fixed that for you.
- d3Xt3r ( @d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz ) English14•1 year ago
* Except SMS
- elouboub ( @elouboub@kbin.social ) 54•1 year ago
Why is this being presented as “whatsapp will be the one and only” instead of “whatsapp won’t be the only option”? The DMA will users to install nearly any chat app and chat with users from another chat app.
- Kayn ( @HKayn@dormi.zone ) English3•1 year ago
Where are you getting “the one and only” from? Are you misinterpreting “one-stop solution”?
- elouboub ( @elouboub@kbin.social ) 9•1 year ago
What are you interpreting “one-stop solution” as?
- kindenough ( @kindenough@kbin.social ) 40•1 year ago
No it won’t.
My sister was angered when I quit whatsapp (and facebook), asking me reasons why and if it was because I didn’t like her. Told her I like my privacy. Haven’t heard of her and a lot of other family since who only like to communicate through social media. Good.
I like SMS and Signal, only people that care for me are using that because I asked them to.
- Zink ( @Zink@programming.dev ) English21•1 year ago
I’m there with you on the ideals, after all here I am on Lemmy (and mastodon fwiw) with Reddit and TwitterX deleted.
But, everybody I am close to in everyday life is a normie for lack of a better term. I don’t have to use Facebook regularly, for example, but there is a practical value to just having it available and checking notifications from time to time.
Kind of like how I’m looking through some code in Linux at work today, but it’s running in a VM on my Microsoft/O365 equipped PC. Much like with Facebook, factors outside my control necessitate using it, so I accept it without stressing myself.
I’m not trying to argue or convince you to change your ways though! FLOSS and privacy need awareness and advocacy, and therefore need strong outspoken supporters!
- Throwdownyourgrandma ( @Throwdownyourgrandma@feddit.nl ) English15•1 year ago
only people that care for me are using that because I asked them to.
That logic works both ways. You don’t care about them enough to use WhatsApp/Facebook it seems to me.
- TheMadnessKing ( @TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id ) English39•1 year ago
The fact that iMessage got the exemptions underpins the entire act. I would any day switch to Signal, if there is 1:1 interoperability b/w the platforms.
- Alonely0 🦀 ( @Alonely0@mastodon.social ) 24•1 year ago
@TheMadnessKing @floppy in Europe for most people iMessage is just the SMS app. Even though it pisses me off that Apple got away with it, having WhatsApp to comply with this is just huge. Everyone here uses WhatsApp, and now I won’t be forced to leave Signal anymore.
- ABluManOnLemmy ( @ABluManOnLemmy@feddit.nl ) English15•1 year ago
Apple just claimed an exception. It’s still up to the EU to determine whether it is actually exempt or not.
- TheMadnessKing ( @TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id ) English1•1 year ago
I’m sure I read that they got the exemption approved.
- Scrollone ( @Scrollone@feddit.it ) English15•1 year ago
iMessage is not considered a gatekeeper in Europe because pretty much nobody uses it. That’s why it’s extempted.
- lud ( @lud@lemm.ee ) English1•1 year ago
Here people use it as a better SMS. Group chats are all on Discord for my generation and the older generations primarily use FB messenger I believe.
- RaivoKulli ( @RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz ) English10•1 year ago
Nobody here uses it though
- TheMadnessKing ( @TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id ) English3•1 year ago
Yes. Thankfully.
- 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠 ( @ChairmanMeow@programming.dev ) English9•1 year ago
It’s because there’s not enough people in the EU actually using it.
- Gamey ( @gamey@feddit.rocks ) English3•1 year ago
They got a exception because npbody uses that insecure garbage here, everyone uses Whatsapp tho so this makes a lot of sense!
- PotatoesFall ( @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English20•1 year ago
Cool so I can decide to use Signal for privacy reasons and if the other party uses WhatsApp all my chats with them are read by Meta? What is the point?
- ExLisper ( @ExLisper@linux.community ) English12•1 year ago
No, it’s still E2EE. Meta can’t read it as far as anyone knows. Meta will know that the other person has you in their contacts (they already know this) and that they are messaging you, that’s it.
- PotatoesFall ( @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English9•1 year ago
Meta writes the software that runs on the other end, and it’s closed source. Therefore for all we know, the message is end-to-end encrypted, and the moment it is decrypted on the other end Meta can send it back to their servers or use it for advertising. Unless the client at the end is open source and audited, E2E doesn’t mean much imo
- ExLisper ( @ExLisper@linux.community ) English4•1 year ago
Well, I think you’re the only one who thinks that E2EE doesn’t mean much.
- bug ( @bug@lemmy.one ) English6•1 year ago
No I think you’ve missed their point. E2EE is end-to-end encryption, as in the message can’t be intercepted in the middle but it’s unencrypted at the end so you can read it. Because the WhatsApp app is closed-source you don’t know that it doesn’t immediately read the message and send the content to Facebook. It probably doesn’t, but it could! E2EE itself means that some third party can’t read your message in transit, though to be fair closed-source again means we just have to trust Facebook when they say WhatsApp uses E2EE.
- SnowdenHeroOfOurTime ( @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org ) English4•1 year ago
So, this isn’t quite as valid a fear as you seem to think. There will be a lot of very smart people analyzing the shit out of what the app appears to be sending to Facebook servers. True it’s closed source but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible to catch them doing fucked up shit. How do you think we currently know about things they do like this? Do you think Facebook told security experts just to be nice? Or do you think the experts figured this shit out on their own?
- PotatoesFall ( @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English5•1 year ago
Sure, good point. But you do agree that it’s harder to trust something that explicitly hides from you what it is doing?
- SnowdenHeroOfOurTime ( @SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org ) English2•1 year ago
Oh I agree they’ll do every bad thing they can get away with. I just think they wouldn’t get away with decrypting the message and sending it straight to FB
- ExLisper ( @ExLisper@linux.community ) English3•1 year ago
I did get their point and what I’m saying is that back doors like this are discussed all the time and as of now, there’s no proof that they exist. To the contrary, we have information confirming that content of E2E encrypted messages is not available to government agencies. Claiming otherwise without proof is simply spreading disinformation.
- PotatoesFall ( @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English2•1 year ago
If somebody hands me a black box, tells me what’s inside, how is the burden of proof on me? I have to trust them blindly until somebody proves that there is something bad in the black box? No, I ask for a transparent box in the first place.
- ExLisper ( @ExLisper@linux.community ) English2•1 year ago
WhatsApp being a black box means we don’t know how it’s doing things but we can still know a lot about what it’s doing and what it’s not doing. For example we know it has permissions to access all the contacts and we know when it’s accessing device location data. We also know from FBI documents that they can’t access content of E2EE messages or how much data it’s transmitting and when. It would be hard for Meta to transmit all received messages to their servers without anyone noticing. It’s good you prefer OSS but it doesn’t mean you can make wild claims about some security flaws like that.
- archchan ( @archchan@lemmy.ml ) English2•1 year ago
That’s not it. It’s E2EE but Meta gathers all the metadata from Whatsapp including who you contact, when, where, how large the messages are, what times you’re online and for how long, phone numbers, names etc. That’s plenty of info to create a profile on users and their connections with each other, as is Facebook’s MO.
- ExLisper ( @ExLisper@linux.community ) English1•1 year ago
That’s exactly what I said. They will have meta data but will not be able to read chats. What are you disagreeing with?
- smileyhead ( @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•1 year ago
The point is that people can switch their apps one by one, not losing any contacts in the way, instead of trying to convience all your friends to install new app at once.
- PotatoesFall ( @PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•1 year ago
You can install both apps and transition one friend at a time
- Fushuan [he/him] ( @fushuan@lemm.ee ) English1•1 year ago
What is the point?
The point is that you are not using Whatsapp to talk to them. Which is inherently an improvement since they only get one sided metadata.
- Gamey ( @gamey@feddit.rocks ) English1•1 year ago
Whatsapp encrypts top and it’s your choice to write with someone on Whatsapp… 🤦
- jet ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) English17•1 year ago
I can’t wait for signal/session/simplex to be whatsapp compatible, but I’m not sure they can provided the e2ee gurantees since whatsapp is closed source.
- Tywèle [she|her] ( @Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English12•1 year ago
I fear that Signal won’t implement cross compatibility for WhatsApp since they already said that they are not a fan of potentially giving up E2EE to get it to work. And I can understand that but I still really would like to have the cross compatibility.
- jet ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) English4•1 year ago
Beeper will do it, if you self host, it shouldn’t be terrible
- sndmn ( @sndmn@lemmy.ca ) English15•1 year ago
Not a fucking chance!
- ArcaneSlime ( @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English14•1 year ago
Odd way to spell Matrix.
- sadreality ( @sadreality@kbin.social ) 14•1 year ago
Signal interoperability
I support it but this doesn’t sound legit
- dangblingus ( @dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English13•1 year ago
It’s weird. With every single app having a DM feature years before Whatsapp was even invented, with every single cell phone having email and SMS capabilities, and with a bunch of E2E encrypted apps already in service, why would I want to go back to Facebook’s ecosystem in 2023?
- heird ( @heird@lemmy.ml ) English9•1 year ago
Whatsapp worked on iPhone, Android, Blackberry and even some old ass java phones
They dominated the market in most countries or were close second to Messenger.
Now they keep growing and it doesn’t give any chance to smaller better apps, this law makes it possible for you to use only signal but also chat to people that only use Whatsapp
- NorthWestWind ( @NorthWestWind@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English12•1 year ago
I setup my own matrix instance and ran a few bridges on it, so I don’t need WhatsApp thanks
- OnU ( @OnU@lemm.ee ) English4•1 year ago
This is the way
- Kaldo ( @Kaldo@kbin.social ) 3•1 year ago
How does that solve communication with people that are exclusively on whatsapp?
- smileyhead ( @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de ) English1•1 year ago
But you still need an account and the bridge does not use official API.
- Flax ( @Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) English1•1 year ago
Bridges?
- NorthWestWind ( @NorthWestWind@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English2•1 year ago
You can set up bridges to link to your other messengers. Then you will only need Matrix to be able to reply to everyone.
- Flax ( @Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) English1•1 year ago
How
- Carlos Solís ( @csolisr@communities.azkware.net ) English9•1 year ago
And this is where I wonder, how long until Matrix servers preemptively defederate from WhatsApp?
- jackoid ( @jackoid@lemm.ee ) English5•1 year ago
Probably won’t. WhatsApp is already huge. Threads was a new platform with artificially inflated user numbers.
- Fushuan [he/him] ( @fushuan@lemm.ee ) English2•1 year ago
Why though? To avoid users leaving Signal for Whatsapp? if you need to chat with someone through matrix into whatsapp, right now you laready have whatsapp installed. I prefer to talk to whatsapp users from a more secure app, thanks.
- ColdWater ( @ColdWater@lemmy.ca ) English9•1 year ago
Eww no get that trash outta here
- 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️ ( @Kolanaki@yiffit.net ) English9•1 year ago
I can assure you, it won’t for me. The only people I ever see using it IRL are meth heads and prostitutes lol
- Pistcow ( @Pistcow@lemm.ee ) English8•1 year ago
Nice try, WhatsApp.