Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago

Biden to Target Industrial Pollution in a 2nd Term, if He Gets One

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
16
link
fedilink
60
external-link

Biden to Target Industrial Pollution in a 2nd Term, if He Gets One

www.nytimes.com

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
16
link
fedilink
If the president wins re-election, his climate team is likely to try to cut greenhouse gases from steel, cement and other hard-to-clean-up manufacturing.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • kriz ( kriz@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 years ago

    i always hate this because its like…ok…but you are president now so just target it now.

    • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 years ago

      A few reasons:

      • Spending significant amounts of money needs congressional support and the Republicans control one house of Congress
      • Changing laws requires not just a majority, but a 60% supermajority in the Senate
      • The US regulatory process is designed to be slow, and the EPA lost most of its staff under Trump, so they prioritized the low-hanging fruit
      • echutaa ( echutaa@programming.dev ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        Sounds like it’s probably not going to happen then if all the stars have to alight to get it.

        • DrugsMcChrist ( DrugsMcChrist@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          funny how real change is just on the horizon but always out of reach. almost as if it were by design

          • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 years ago

            The US political system is designed to protect the prerogatives of the wealthy. It takes a sustained majority over time to overcome that. We’ve gotten to the point where there has been significant but not yet sufficient action:

            • Biden cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law
            • Signed the Inflation Reduction Act
            • enacted a regulation to force vehicle electrification into law
            • passed a regulation to force fossil fuels out of most power plants

            The Washington Post has a much more complete list

        • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s not so much about the stars all aligning, but needing to hold a majority of the centers of power for long enough. We’ve gone from being blown off to not having the votes to do anything at all to getting significant but not yet sufficient action. Getting to where we need to be is going to happen at some point, and it’s on us to make it happen sooner rather than later.

          • echutaa ( echutaa@programming.dev ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            I envy your optimism, but this just sounds like an empty promise with a built in scapegoat. What makes you so sure this will happen?

            • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 years ago

              I’m not. It takes electing more and better Democrats instead of lurching into fascism. We could well fail, but it’s crazy to not try

            • GBU_28 ( GBU_28@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 years ago

              It is hypothetically more likely to occur when folks who want it to occur are employed/elected than when those people are specifically absent

      • PeepinGoodArgs ( PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          We got a lot of that:

          • Cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law
          • pass the Inflation Reduction Act
          • enact a regulation to force vehicle electrification
          • pass a regulation to force fossil fuels out of most power plants

          The Washington Post has a much more complete list

          Some things got overturned in court, like the drilling permit moratorium.

          Also, the mid-terms were in 2022. Getting more and better Democrats in congress plus reelecting Biden would make it possible to do a lot more.

  • blazera ( blazera@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    He accelerated it in his first term, so fuck em.

    • philm ( philm@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, but what’s the alternative?

      It’s a fucked up system we (in the industrial society) have. I would obviously want to have a different candidate that’s less influenced by lobby and rich people. But it’s not what the “system wants to have”…

      • blazera ( blazera@kbin.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        Younger, progressive candidates.

  • Andy ( andrewrgross@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    “If you are seen as imposing debilitating regulations on heavy industry that employs large numbers of people, you’re not only going to get a backlash from manufacturing, but labor as well,” said David Axelrod, the Democratic strategist who ran former President Barack Obama’s campaigns. “How to do that without looking like you are stabbing these industries in the back, or in the front for that matter, is a real political challenge.”

    Godbless him he’s trying, but no… it’s not actually hard to get labor on board with this.

    Step 1: Consult labor leaders and make labor standards and union requirements for government contracts a part of the regulatory requirements.

    Step 2: Place barriers on outsourcing.

    That’s kind of it. You say, “We’re going to place new burdens on this industry!” and the executives say, “We’ll hold jobs hostage!” and you say “No… if you want to deal in US dollars, you’ll make it here, you’ll employ unionized workers, and you’ll smile and thank us for all the fucking money you’re making.”

  • Metal Zealot ( Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      He’s actually done a lot:

      • Biden cut the issuance of drilling leases to the minimum required by law
      • Signed the Inflation Reduction Act
      • enacted a regulation to force vehicle electrification into law
      • passed a regulation to force fossil fuels out of most power plants

      The Washington Post has a much more complete list

      The reason this is on the to-do list instead of done is that Trump left the EPA short-staffed, so they’re only now thinking about the smaller harder pieces of decarbonization.

  • Pssdoff ( Pssdoff@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    When is he going to get to fulfilling all the bullshit he promised from the last time he campaigned?

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 195 users / day
  • 830 users / week
  • 1.42K users / month
  • 3.76K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.08K subscribers
  • 13.2K Posts
  • 22.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code