Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago

AOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'

www.commondreams.org

external-link
message-square
31
link
fedilink
534
external-link

AOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'

www.commondreams.org

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
31
link
fedilink
  • Nonameuser678 ( Nonameuser678@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 years ago

    In Australia we’ve just essentially criminalised climate protesting. Climate protestors now risk a huge fine and even jail time. A lot of people suspect it’s because governments are preparing in advance for what might become a huge movement that they can’t control. So they’re trying to disincentivise people before shit hits the fan.

    • Sir_Kevin ( Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 years ago

      That sounds about right. Sadly for them, no manner of law is going to stop the mobs when people start going hungry.

    • IHaveTwoCows ( IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • kattfisk ( kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        I’d say it’s more that peaceful protest and violent protest are symbiotic. Peaceful movements attract broad support, and ensure you can not easily be dismissed as extremists and violently suppressed. Violent protest show that you can not be ignored without consequence.

        The idea that they are at odds is harmful.

        • HandwovenConsensus ( HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Huh, never thought of it that way, but that makes a lot of sense. Kind of a carrot and stick approach.

      • Nonameuser678 ( Nonameuser678@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/environment/2023/09/16/trial-protesting-against-woodside this is one of the examples of what’s happening in Australia right now. Counter terrorism police raiding people’s homes for vandalism (if you can even call it that). Let this be a warning and prepare accordingly. I guarantee your governments are looking at how they can do this shit in your countries.

        • IHaveTwoCows ( IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator

    • mayo ( mayo@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      I went to a climate protest in Canada last week and it was way to tame to actually get anything accomplished.

      The main part of the protest was walking down a main artery. For protesters, there is incentive to walk slowly and spread out to make the walk longer and disrupt status-quo longer, but the organizers clearly only had permission to march for a specific duration so they were in the back hurrying people forward so we’d stay within our allotted time window. Maybe 30 minutes. Once a year. It was pointless.

      Add to that that 90% of the people there were exactly the people you’d expect to be there and it just felt like a waste of time.

      • Comment105 ( Comment105@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        It absolutely was a waste of time, nobody noticed or gave a shit.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 159 users / day
  • 627 users / week
  • 1.55K users / month
  • 3.65K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.02K subscribers
  • 13K Posts
  • 21.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code