- TheRealCharlesEames ( @TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee ) English19•1 year ago
Tough to go from free to $10/month without any obvious to me improvements, as much as I’d like to support the cause
- Linssiili ( @Linssiili@sopuli.xyz ) 14•1 year ago
Have you tried it? At least for me, I often get better results compared to google. Also Kagi has a free trial of 100 searches.
Granted I’m a developer, so my job is basically just searching for information, so getting better results is really valuable for me.
- ram ( @ram@lemmy.ca ) English12•1 year ago
Totally valid. For me the killer feature is being able to change the weights for various sites, making it so websites with content that’s not useful to me or I don’t like don’t appear[1], pinning websites that I consider best-of-class for their relevant searches[2], and prioritizing websites I do like, but aren’t always the best answer[3].
They also have a “Lenses” feature that lets you make your own search lens (like I have one for Lemmy-only results), but I’ve not really had much use for those.
e.g. wikipedia, the ffxiv wiki ↩︎
e.g. opencritic, speedrun.com, cbc, w3schools, github ↩︎
- goji ( @goji@lemmy.ca ) English4•1 year ago
The regex redirect feature is another massive pro. I hope they bring it into Orion as well.
I already use Stop the Madness for this, and probably will continue to as it’s a more global solution, but having it built right into the search engine at least shows they’re taking real steps to hand control back to the user.
- ram ( @ram@lemmy.ca ) English3•1 year ago
Oh ya I use that as well, to turn Youtube results into Invidious, reddit into web.archive.org/save/, twitter into nitter, tiktok into proxitok, and AMP results into normal articles. It’s nice because, since I use kagi on my phone, it reaches where extensions don’t normally.
- shastaxc ( @shasta@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
I’m pretty sure there are browser extensions that already do this for you on Google. You can do it manually on each search but that’s obviously cumbersome. But browser extensions are basically what you’re describing and still free
- ram ( @ram@lemmy.ca ) English2•1 year ago
There’s literally not. For blocking, sure, but not changing the behaviours of your search algorithm.
- shastaxc ( @shasta@lemm.ee ) 1•1 year ago
Oh so I’m just imagining this? https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublacklist/pncfbmialoiaghdehhbnbhkkgmjanfhe
It literally lets you construct a blacklist so those sites don’t show up in future search results.
This one has been around for over 5 years.
- ram ( @ram@lemmy.ca ) English2•1 year ago
Blocks sites you specify from appearing in Google search results
I wonder if you even read my comment? Also chill, there’s no need to condescend over a search engine lmao.
- shastaxc ( @shasta@lemm.ee ) 5•1 year ago
Yeah you’re right. I only read up to the part about blocking sites and got excited to share my knowledge. Sorry.
- ram ( @ram@lemmy.ca ) English2•1 year ago
I appreciate the apology ♥
There’s the 5$/month option available if you don’t search more than 300 times a month.
- ink ( @ink@r.nf ) English5•1 year ago
It’s cheaper to just run SearXNG instance. People claiming any new search engine is better than established ones are hallucinating with their anecdotes.
- Kayn ( @HKayn@dormi.zone ) English6•1 year ago
How easy is it for an average Joe to set up their own SearXNG instance?
- The Doctor ( @drwho@beehaw.org ) English1•1 year ago
It appears a bit more difficult than setting up the original Searx. I’ve been poking around in the code for SearXNG lately because I’m planning on migrating to it but haven’t done any serious work with it yet.
- seeg ( @seeg@toot.whatever.cz ) 12•1 year ago
@narwhal Anyone recommending self-hosting searchx instead
- https://dalf.github.io/searxng/donate.html They also ask for donations to help improve code
- Cheapest server is at around $5/month.
- Maintenance, upgrades, DDOS protection and whatnot also costs money.
- You’re still only as good as Google results allow you to be.
- goo ( @goo@lemm.ee ) 2•1 year ago
Correct. Same dum dums complaining about the proce are there ones buying $12 lattes/day.
- nyakojiru ( @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 7•1 year ago
Pay for search? There should be another approach… at this rate will be paying for every single thing we do on internet and navigating properly would require a bunch of money .
- Kayn ( @HKayn@dormi.zone ) English9•1 year ago
You are already paying everywhere with your attention and your time by watching ads, it’s just been normalized to the point of you not realizing it.
And if you’re using an ad blocker, that’s effectively piracy.
- hh93 ( @hh93@lemm.ee ) 7•1 year ago
It’s either this or ads or selling your data
Oh, there’s a third way. Like DuckDuckGo & Qwant for example. Just have sponsored ads unrelated to you, or ads related to the specific search only (Without detailing your actual search terms to the one buying the ads) and selected companies in such “store” articles results.
- hh93 ( @hh93@lemm.ee ) English5•1 year ago
I said it’s ads or selling data - it can be any combination of those 3 factors
- smellythief ( @smellythief@beehaw.org ) 2•1 year ago
User choice in the form of multiple tiers would be ideal. I might or might not pay to remove non-creepy ads depending on how they’re presented.
- mayooooo ( @MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org ) 3•1 year ago
Yeah, I want to pay some sort of tax so that I can afford all of this stuff. Patreon this, patreon that, pay email, pay for search, I’m not made out of money
- aksdb ( @aksdb@feddit.de ) 4•1 year ago
Sweet. I guess I will use that for a month or two and then reevaluate.
ITT: People who haven’t tried Kagi.
Edit: Not shilling, Google just doesn’t do what I need/want anymore.
- SokathHisEyesOpen ( @Anticorp@lemmy.ml ) English2•1 year ago
What is ITT?
In This Thread.
- SokathHisEyesOpen ( @Anticorp@lemmy.ml ) English1•1 year ago
Thanks!
- SokathHisEyesOpen ( @Anticorp@lemmy.ml ) English1•1 year ago
Oh nice! That’s cool.